oldmanfan

nope.

The other thing I’d look at is ammunition. Simple math tells me that if you have a magazine that can shoot 10 bullets vs. magazines that can shoot 100, I can do ten times more damage with the latter. I am not a gun guy so I would need input on this being possible.

I like the idea of a federal study. I think that formal studies of effects of gun types, amount of gun violence, etc. have been discouraged

That would have helped. But one of the unique features of Covid was the asymptomatic carrier status,

In Thr Heller decision Scalia indicated that you have the right to bear arms but the type of arms you can carry could be regulated. Maybe we should listen to him.

No. Once we knew about the fact that you could have asymptomatic carrying for a couple weeks, we could have all gotten behind masking and distancing. A lot less people would have died.

I helped take it off the rails so I apologize. MLB will normalize and stay about the same I suspect. Some hardcore people might leave and pick up some hardcore on the other side of the aisle. With time feelings will subside.

Probably true. Many viruses are. But it took research to confirm.

Again it is moot. No one claimed a mask mandate at a federal level. You are erecting false straw men you can knock down to try and make yourself look smart. It didn’t work.

A mask mandate is not unconstitutional and they never mandated one federally. States did, and governors have executive power to do so. And the we we are endowed by our creator line is from the Declaration and not the Constitution. Your level of stupidity regarding the constitution is stunning. As far as Trump abdicating responsibility the list of things he should have done but didn’t is too long to detail here. We could start with him knowing it would be severe but then told Americans otherwise.

I hope so. But there’s a reason that provision was put in. Same for taking overall responsibility from the Secretary of State. Bottom line is they made a law to address a non-existent issue.

I don’t like the legislature being able to potentially disenfranchise voters by overruling county officials.

I truly hope that when a Republican legislature sees long lines in a Democratic county that they will open more polling places. But of course they could have done that last election but you still had very long lines in counties that are primarily Democratic. Color me skeptical. I want everybody to be able to vote. I would make the same comments if a Democratic legislature did this to highly Republican counties. Can you say the same?

Where do most of the black voters in Georgia live is the question to ask. In the counties in and around Atlanta and other cities.

Over 50%. Now, quit being such an insufferable a-hole.

I think I have mentioned my favorite President was Truman. Not necessarily for his policies but because he had to make more critical decisions than perhaps any other President than Lincoln. And he always shot straight with the American public. The Buck Stops Here. When I think of how he would have dealt with the pandemic and compare to Trump (I take no responsibility) it both saddens.and enrages me.

For the 2020 election, there were 94 drop boxes across the four counties that make up the core of metropolitan Atlanta: Fulton, Cobb, DeKalb and Gwinnett. The new law limits the same four counties to a total of, at most, 23 drop boxes, based on the latest voter registration data. The number could be lower depending on how many early-voting sites the counties provide.

The masking data is incontrovertible. Laboratory and observational studies all indicate mitigation depending on the type of mask. And the leader of the country knew about the severity of the pandemic and abdicated his responsibility.

See above genius. And now I am truly done.

This starts it. You keep claiming no one read the bill, and it turns out you didn’t. How does it feel to look ridiculous? SECTION 26. 1097 Said chapter is further amended by revising Code Section 21-2-382, relating to additional 1098 sites as additional registrar's office or place of registration for absentee ballots, as follows: 1099 "21-2-382. 1100 (a) Any other provisions of this chapter to the contrary notwithstanding, the board of 1101 registrars may establish additional sites as additional registrar's offices or places of 1102 registration for the purpose of receiving absentee ballots under Code Section 21-2-381 and 1103 for the purpose of voting absentee ballots advance voting under Code Section 21-2-385, 1104 provided that any such site is a building that is a branch of the county courthouse, a 1105 courthouse annex, a government service center providing general government services, 1106 another government building generally accessible to the public, or a location building that 1107 is used as an election day polling place, notwithstanding that such location building is not 1108 a government building. 1109 (b) Any other provisions of this chapter to the contrary notwithstanding, in all counties of 1110 this state having a population of 550,000 or more according to the United States decennial 1111 census of 1990 or any future such census, any building that is a branch of the county 1112 courthouse or courthouse annex established within any such county shall be an additional 1113 registrar's or absentee ballot clerk's office or place of registration for the purpose of 1114 receiving absentee ballots under Code Section 21-2-381 and for the purpose of voting 1115 absentee ballots advance voting under Code Section 21-2-385. 1116 (c)(1) A board of registrars or absentee ballot clerk shall establish at least one drop box 1117 as a means for absentee by mail electors to deliver their ballots to the board of registrars 1118 or absentee ballot clerk. A board of registrars or absentee ballot clerk may establish 1119 additional drop boxes, subject to the limitations of this Code section, but may only S. B. 202 (SUB) - 44 - 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 21 LC 28 0338S establish additional drop boxes totaling the lesser of either one

I gave you the section of the bill. Read it. You wanted it. Read it. You’d rather depend on Fox News. Par for the course.

Those statements were made very early before we realized the extent of the pandemic. Trump didD his big events when the pandemic was in full force, when the value of masking and distancing were established, and after he admitted to Woodward how bad the pandemic was but the lied to the people. You know this, so be better than this.

I just did, and as I was the other day I am done with you on this topic. You make theses big claims about reading the bill and it turns out you’re full of crap.

I went to the actual bill listed by the state of Georgia. You went to a Fox News site. How surprising. You have gone I. And in about actually reading the bill and it turns out you rely on Fox News. Hysterical. legis.ga.gov. Start there.

ATLANTA)-Today, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger announced the results of the Risk Limiting Audit of Georgia’s presidential contest, which upheld and reaffirmed the original outcome produced by the machine tally of votes cast. Due to the tight margin of the race and the principles of risk-limiting audits, this audit was a full manual tally of all votes cast. The audit confirmed that the original machine count accurately portrayed the winner of the election. The results of the audit can be viewed HERE , HERE , and HERE . “Georgia’s historic first statewide audit reaffirmed that the state’s new secure paper ballot voting system accurately counted and reported results,” said Secretary Raffensperger. “This is a credit to the hard work of our county and local elections officials who moved quickly to undertake and complete such a momentous task in a short period of time.” “Georgia’s first statewide audit successfully confirmed the winner of the chosen contest and should give voters increased confidence in the results,” said Ben Adida, Executive Director of VotingWorks. “We were proud to work with Georgia on this historic audit. The difference between the reported results and the full manual tally is well within the expected error rate of hand-counting ballots, and the audit was a success.” By law, Georgia was required to conduct a Risk Limiting Audit of a statewide race following the November elections. Understanding the importance of clear and reliable results for such an important contest, Secretary Raffensperger selected the presidential race in Georgia for the audit. Meeting the confidence threshold required by law for the audit meant conducting a full manual tally of every ballot cast in Georgia. The Risk Limiting Audit reaffirmed the outcome of the presidential race in Georgia as originally reported, with Joe Biden leading President Donald Trump in the state. The audit process also led to counties catching making mistakes they made in their original count by not uploading all memory cards. Those counties uploaded the memory cards and re-certified their results, leading to increased accuracy in the results the state will certify. The differential of the audit results from the original machine counted results is well within the expected margin of human error that occurs when hand-counting ballots. A 2012 study by Rice University and Clemson University found that “hand counting of votes in postelection audit or recount procedures can result in error rates of up to 2 percent.” In Georgia’s recount, the highest error rate in any county recount was .73%. Most counties found no change in their finally tally. The majority of the remaining counties had changes of fewer than ten ballots. Because the margin is still less than 0.5%, the President can request a recount after certification of the results. That recount will be conducted by rescanning all paper ballots. Dies this match your definition of data? If not, speaking as a scientist you don’t understand what data means.