Jump to content

JohnBonhamRocks

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,532
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JohnBonhamRocks

  1. I picked NE vs. MIN. I do think the fact that JAX has Coughlin in the house, and a front that could get to Brady might mean something. I also do think that PHI could pull this off given it is at their house. But, NE is NE, and MIN seems to have some magic going for it this year. Playing for the chance to play the Super Bowl at home has to be a unique motivator.
  2. I know, I was talking more about on the message board, but it is unfortunate because I wish it could be yelled out at tailgates and the games, too.
  3. I know someone else in this thread already made the joke, so credit to that person not me, but who else is excited for the countless "Give him Da-boll!" jokes to be had the next season? I know I am.
  4. It makes me think of Mario video games, and what's wrong with that?
  5. Voted Rudolph. Not enamored with him, but he's got above 60% completion over the past 3 years, with it rising each year. His TD:INT ratio got better as he progressed. He's got the size. Fits the pocket passer mold OBD has stated they want. Plus, if we only got a bridge QB, I at least want some prospect back there learning who isn't Peterman, so I cannot pass although I do not love either Rudolph or Jackson.
  6. What is generally thought to be Lotulelei's price?
  7. Oh okay, I see. I think those two are close. Ducasse definitely quieted some doubters down the stretch.
  8. I have to disagree that RT has been our biggest problem. QB and DT definitely rank ahead.
  9. I guess I fall right around where you do. If we traded our 4th for him, then I would cry neither tears of sadness nor of joy.
  10. Agreed Mills is subpar and there are questions with Glenn. Just took the BPA at positions of need. I do think Miller is primed to be one of the comeback players on our roster next year. Maybe then you take issue with selecting Price where I did in that mock, but I think he also gives flexibility to our interior OL. Would you say OT is a higher draft need than OG?
  11. Although I am leaning towards favoring trading Glenn, we currently have Glenn, Dawkins, and Mills under contract.
  12. Matt Miller - User-Voted - Difficult - First Five Rounds 21: R1P21 QB MASON RUDOLPH OKLAHOMA STATE 22: R1P22 LB RASHAAN EVANS ALABAMA 53: R2P21 C BILLY PRICE OHIO STATE 56: R2P24 DL RASHEEM GREEN USC 95: R3P31 WR JAMES WASHINGTON OKLAHOMA STATE 123: R4P21 TE HAYDEN HURST SOUTH CAROLINA 160: R5P21 RB BO SCARBROUGH ALABAMA 168: R5P29 QB LUKE FALK WASHINGTON STATE A dream? Sure. Is it fun to dream? You bet.
  13. His name is Nick Papagiorgio.
  14. I would think, given Daboll's scheme, that a more intelligent QB would have a leg up. Who would you all consider the most cerebral QB in this class?
  15. http://www.buffalobills.com/news/article-1/Bills-sign-S-Kelcie-McCray-/3610f983-2352-4011-b582-efa069c17dee Buffalo continued to fill out their offseason roster with reserve/future free agents. On Wednesday, the Bills signed S Kelcie McCray. McCray, 29, was last with the Seattle Seahawks appearing mainly on special teams in the 2015 and 2016 seasons, though he did fill in for an injured Kam Chancellor at safety in his two seasons with Seattle. He was originally signed as an undrafted rookie in 2012 by Miami, but spent his rookie season on injured reserve with a broken foot. Claimed off waivers from the Dolphins in 2013 by Tampa Bay, McCray was primarily a special teamer for the Bucs appearing in 11 games. In 2014, he was traded to Kansas City where he appeared in all 16 games as a special teamer. He re-signed with the Chiefs that offseason, but was traded to Seattle for a fifth-round pick in Sept. of 2015. An Arkansas State product, McCray (6-2, 202) has appeared in 63 NFL games in his career. Discuss (or don't, totally your call).
  16. Shhh. Stop making sense.
  17. (1) I feel like I've heard a 3rd a lot. (2) The most I'd give up is a 4th I think. Edit: To clarify, that would be in a scenario where I want to do that. I don't
  18. Who decided to put them all on line 3? That's exactly why you have multiple lines!
  19. I'm not against Bradford, even with the injury history. You're effectively just hoping he can make it 5-6 games before turning it over to your rookie QB. I disagree with the idea that we should sign Bradford for a rookie to sit and learn the whole year.
  20. I liked your comment, but then it occurred to me that working with the Killer Bs might be more appealing than with a team that has zero QBs on contract for 2018.
  21. May the Force be strong with Darth Zayder next season.
  22. If this thread is our comprehensive target discussion area, then I move for the word, in all caps, MEGA-THREAD to be added to the title.
  23. On the contrary, I think, even more than his talent, that one of the most appealing things about signing Cousins is being able to use all of those five top-100 picks to fill out the rest of the roster. If we signed our QB, then we can afford to draft 5 of the BPA at HB/WR/OG/OT/DT/DE/LB/CB.
  24. No worries. I actually remembering wanting Munchak during one of our HC searches.
  25. We could just sit where we are, take another talented LB, and then have another 1st round pick to use on another talented player.
×
×
  • Create New...