GoBills808

To be considered yearly Super Bowl contenders wouldn't you have to be contending yearly for a Super Bowl?

No I was referring to the guy who feels the need to voice his opinion in favor of curtailing civil rights for minorities because they hurt his feelings

^^especially tough in a thread about contract extensions for a head coach and general manager ffs

and we must never let the pursuit of a Super Bowl get in the way of the ultimate goal of not being a poor organization

Imo he's just slightly elevated that phony bro intellectualism but in the landscape of sportswriting this is probably fair tbh

the degree to which he allows his voice to color the narrative is extremely lazy and to me indicative of inherent superficiality i would call him solipsistic but that's probably giving him too much credit

I don't automatically assume regression I mean, I would suffer a couple more regular season losses if it meant come playoff time we had a staff and HC that enjoyed the big moments

It's not that difficult to establish a winning tradition when you have a quarterback who will literally do anything in his physical power to win football games

Dunne can't write

Boise state also thinks grass is blue tho

The majority of the drops are mostly Davis's fault. Jet's game stands out in particular Miscommunications play big into the reason passer rating when targeting Davis is so low. Throws at Davis turned into INTs at a much higher rate than other receivers

50% catch rate passer rating of 80 when targeted

that should read inefficient

Best in the league on third down

Yes. That's how you improve, by getting better players Not changing what's working to accommodate limited ones as you propose

I think that's the point Davis's targets incredibly efficient, so having him at close to 1000yards is an anchor on your offense He needs to be a third option, w fewer targets and yards

So you want to change one of the best offenses in the league to suit Davis

sheer indifference likely hereditary

As far as I know I haven't mocked the folks in the submarine...certainly not in this thread but if you really want something to be upset about I'll admit the irony of a luxury submarine tour sinking in full view of the Titanic is not lost on me

The point of the comparison was the manner (and timing) in which the two events occurred and why one might choose to care about one vs the other That the circumstances which led to both tragedies were completely different should have gone without mentioning but alas

lol yeah that's me, the bitter docile ghoul on youtube you, however, are surely wanting to conserve that energy as you participate in the rescue effort. ill send you my thoughts and prayers

Play stupid games win stupid prizes

Only in the playoffs though Which is why people who refuse to even acknowledge that (defensive) coaching might be the issue have to marry excellent regular season results w objectively bad postseason results I am absolutely making that argument, the context being that a decent defense in the playoffs can support an offense that doesn't blow people away like Burrow and the Bengals EDIT- I realize this is unclear; the intent is to say Burrow and the Bengals offense DO NOT blow teams out

Kind of disagree and I'll use the Bengals as an example Over the last 3 years both the Bills and the Bengals have played 7 postseason games, largely against common opponents In SIX OUT OF SEVEN of those games the Bengals defense HELD their opponents to under 24 points, and the 7th game was at exactly 24. The Bills defense by contrast has ALLOWED 24 or more points in FIVE OUT OF SEVEN playoff games.

If he's not a good WR then what are we supposed to call Davis?