WEATHER DOT COM

Hit him before the ball got there Flag every time

Obvious flag on #20 he knew it

Context It's fine if you're stuck at 3rd and 15 at the opponents 40 It's not fine stuck at 3rd and 6 from the opponents 20 IMO

McDermott is such a loser FG city

Big miss

McDermott would prefer to save his challenge for a one-yard spot differential.

Yes. They usually do. This stat can easily be researched.

Better chance on 4 QB sneaks from 2 yards than 3 from 1 yard IMO

yay vaccine takes are back on TBD. I thought they were only allowed in KKK errrrr PPP

It doesn't change the fact that Tre's specific charity has not run a single event since March 12, 2022. Hopefully his charity is passing this money on to an organization that is actively helping the community at this time.

All for giving to charities but does Tre's charity actually do anything? https://www.reachingforexcellence27.com/take-action Two events listed on the website - One is a mobile food distribution that was held March 12, 2022 The other is a football camp with a date TBD.

https://giantswire.usatoday.com/2021/09/27/new-york-giants-adoree-jackson-ticked-off-over-dropped-interception/ The New York Giants’ future would look a lot different today had one play turned out differently in their 17-14 loss to the Atlanta Falcons on Sunday. With a little more than five minutes remaining in the fourth quarter and the Giants nursing a 14-7 lead, Atlanta had a second-and-goal on the Giants’ six. Falcons quarterback Matt Ryan overthrew rookie tight end Kyle Pitts in the end zone. The ball sailed over Pitts’ head and into the hands of Giants cornerback Adoree’ Jackson for a possible game-sealing interception. Except Jackson could not reel the ball in. It fell to the turf and was called incomplete. On the next play, Logan Ryan was called for pass interference giving Atlanta a fresh set of downs from the one-yard line. They scored the game-tying touchdown two plays later. After the game, Jackson had no real answers for the miscue. “I just dropped it.

She has enough money to make a play to get an ownership stake in a team by offering to buy part of a team with the billions she currently possesses. Dating Kelce and breaking up with him in a few months won't affect that.

Excuse me In reality, timing for this storm won't be known until it hits tomorrow, which will beyond suck if you traveled to DC early for the game.

jujitsu

You don't say. It ain't specific to Araiza.

I guess we will see when the lawsuit is settled/dismissed/won/lost/etc. This has come and gone with a majority of the public and the lawsuit still exists.

Not saying she was directly prompted, however her comments were part of a conversation with an unnamed to this point male reporter who is also "joking about Diggs."

Offense makes sense. She is not the best in coverage.

That's about as bold an assumption as those who assume Terry said what he said. As I mentioned to Motorin, that could certainly be the case, but it would sink the lawsuit and be a brutal move by Trotter's lawyer. The NFL has had countless instances of saying one thing and doing another. Then why is this quip included in the lawsuit? It's strong enough without it.

David Gottlieb, Trotter's lawyer, not Trotter, is the one "protecting" the so-called source. You seem to be leaving out the possibility that the reporter in question lied or exaggerated the statements during the 2020 zoom call where Trotter heard the allegations, but told the truth during the investigation. This is certainly possible. The lawsuit would be dead in the water if this was specifically the case. The follow-up example of Trotter not being interviewed regarding the direct first-hand remarks he heard from Jerry Jones, however, gives credence to the inclusion of the anecdote on Pegula. Trotter's case against the NFL is strong even without the Pegula quip.

Based on the logic of the Buffalo News article regarding the investigation --- https://buffalonews.com/news/local/lawsuit-accuses-bills-co-owner-terry-pegula-of-making-racist-remarks-he-denies-claim/article_dcada732-5187-11ee-a9d7-b7bd6245731d.html A league source told The Buffalo News that the alleged comment was thoroughly investigated, including interviews with Terry and his wife and co-owner, Kim Pegula – who both denied the statement – and every other person at the dinner where this conversation purportedly took place. The investigation took place shortly after the comment was brought to the league’s attention, and no one else from the dinner recalled the statement being made, according to this source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The dinner took place in 2018 and no one complained about the purported racist remark until the 2020 NFL Media video call, the source said. The reporter – not Trotter – who brought it up on the call claims to have directly heard the “Africa” remark, David Gottlieb, one of Trotter’s attorneys, told The News. --- #3 cannot be true if #1 and/or #2 are true. 1. Every person at the dinner denied the statement was made 2. No one else from the dinner recalled the statement being made 3. The reporter claims to have directly heard the "Africa" remark

The reporter was at the dinner.

haha right she even couched her comment in the most PC way possible - outside of not saying anything

Per the Buffalo News report everyone at the dinner was interviewed. However, this is illogical as the reporter who overheard the comments was at the dinner. Therefore, the reporter who made the claims was not interviewed. It's not in the lawsuit because it's Trotter's case, not said reporters. It has bearing on the case (the case against the NFL - not against Terry, which does not exist) because it is a second set of evidence beyond Trotter's first-hand conversation with Jerry Jones which was Trotter claims was also not investigated properly. In that scenario, the first-hand witness to the comments (Trotter) was not interviewed. It does not state his statements as fact.