foreboding

Makes sense they need the extra spot to keep a wr.

Daniel Jones is a rookie and this is preseason...please put him out that Shurmer...lol. they act like this kid is the anointed one after a few games against patchwork defenses with no game planning.

Wasn't Barkley sitting at home when we got him? Seems crazy cause he can play. IMO Matt Barkley is Josh Rosen's ceiling.

You always pay the working man and you don't slow pay them. Doing so shows a serious lack of class.

My way too early analysis of Singletary is that he looks like he has a little Thurman/Le'veon to his game. Patient, waits for blocks, great vision and squeezes through small holes and looks to be a heck of a pass catcher.

People who are innocent of murdering their children's mother do not write books called, "If I did it."

Exactly. If anyone has spent even a little time looking at the facts, especially in light of the loads of new info, then you know the defense manipulated that jury, with mastery and unethical behaviour, does not mean he was innocent, he just 'got away with it'. Those who defend the verdict have either not studied it, or have some kind of skin in the game. I wish our owners would just expunge his nasty self from our team. Shameful and disgusting what he did to those two people and his old young children. He robbed his kids of their mother, there is no possible way to excuse that.

You believe that he was innocent?

As long as he is on the wall, I feel like our team is turning a blind eye to something that transcends sports. Crazy that his name is up in lights and is celebrated in our stadium. According to this twitter though, he has a lot of getting even to do. So we have that to look forward to.

This exactly. We all know he was guilty, it is so stinking obvious. So our owners can do whatever the heck they want to eliminate the pariah from our team. Screw that guy, he sucks as a human being.

Good points. I imagine the Puegula's and the management team have debated this ad nauseum. Still the owners can do what they think it right, irrespective of the law. If they said this, would many condemn them? "We do not feel that OJ Simpson represents the values that this team holds dear. We strive to be a positive force in our community and with our fans. The Buffalo Bills are strong supporters of family and fair treatment of women and children. Being enshrined on the wall is about on the field accomplishment as well as recognition of players we think exemplify these values. We respect the judicial system but are exercising our rights as team owners. We have decided to remove his name from the Wall of Fame in our stadium."

No, not really. Just because the court clearly got it wrong because of...well you have seen the numerous documentaries. Does that mean that an independent owner, not bound by a court decision, should also get it wrong?

Of course. But do you think that egregious personal conduct should or could affect that standing? Especially something as horrific as murdering your kids mom? I mean we are talking about a monument to players on the wall of the stadium. Not some plaque in a museum.

I agree, see my later response.

Bet the marketing dept loves seeing that bad boy on the sideline.

hahaha - never saw that.

How is a troll, is the name still there? Did we have an internet back then? Does each year make it any less shameful or more? Look at this lovely piece: https://innerloopblog.com/2019/05/04/oj-simpson-to-be-removed-from-bills-wall-of-fame-replaced-with-arthur-shawcross/

I shall not F myself. You are right though, I re-read the thread and I escalated on you because it (he) pisses me off, I apologize for that. I have friends down here who see this POS out on the course, in the bar etc-- You did offer an explanation, not a defense. Sorry about that.

Your argument in favor of leaving him there, is that a HOF career is more important than the weight of a double murder. What is misrepresented here? The trial? C'mon it was a farce and the world knows this. PS: You are right, we will never agree so let's not snipe. You want it left alone- I got it.

You argument in favor is about stats. Field performance, I am saying that the Wall should be more. Please, what about that is asinine? Sorry you got your feelings hurt, not my intention. But come on man, defending this POS is silly--wake up.

I think it is worth mentioning until it is gone. Get that POS off the WOF.

No one in the whole world thinks he was innocent. Because he "got away with it" doesn't mean he has to get away with it on the WOF.

I stated the reasons, and if you think stats are more important than a double homicide, we are not in the same realm of understanding. Is the wall about stats? I think it is whatever the owners make it to be. Good people who rep the city and team. OJ was no hero to our city, he hated it here and we won nothing with him. Big deal, he held the rushing record. HOF, no, but I get it if he was. HOF is a criteria based qualification. Our wall is whatever we want it to be. What our owners want it to be about. Even if in the past is was about stats, how about we also make it about people who love and represent the team well?

On the occasion a camera gets a glimpse of his name on the wall, I cringe.

Why should this be locked? The forum is called STADIUM WALL ...and this is a legit issue. I also think this forum is a place where it is possible the management of the team could see how the fans really feel about him being on the wall. Please, pipe in and don't lock this.