DaBillsFanSince1973

did I say I wanted to bet you? 10 to 1 odds were in reference to him out playing taylor. my bad, I thought you were talking about taylor. I stand on the 10-1 odds McCarron does better then taylor. fair enough I have no problem with saying McCarron will be better then taylor, no problem at all.

really, for someone that is uncertain or claims they couldn't decide one way or the other, this tells me you're leaning toward failure rather then success. ftr, it was a matter of speaking, I'm not going to take your money.

so then it's wait and see for you. no one knows based off the little nfl experience but I would bet 10 to 1 he does better then the last stop gap QB. those that brought him in never would of signed him had they not felt he was going to be the better option? we shall see.

yeah, 3rd team, second starting. I can see him all of a sudden becoming an accurate passer capable of reading defenses while leading the team to touchdowns consistently. browns finish 11-5, win the division and make the playoffs and he and the offense score much more then 3 points in the divisional round. then he ends up facing brady and co in the afc championship game, beating the patsies single handedly leading the browns to the sb where he and the browns win against rogers and the pack and named sb mvp.

was that you after waiting 18 years for the playoffs?

I like the yankees

hindsight may make one believe they can predict the future but wouldn't it be best to allow it to play out rather then considering it inevitable? so far this regime has picked up some decent players, ended the drought and have one hell of an opportunity in just a few weeks to add even more and until I see them go 4-12, 6-10, 7-9 and fall flat, I'm believing they're on the rise to contention. if not, a drag yes but why think about the drag, that has yet to happen? jmo of course.

he is gone, that's good news. I thought this was a McCarron thread?

it will send many off the deep end, which frankly could be very entertaining.

absolutely OP!!! I'm already planning a 4 month hiatus from the game if it comes to pass.

2018 NFL Draft report: Josh Allen is the QB that Buffalo Bills are most interested in, but why? Are you on board with the the Bills drafting the big, former Wyoming passer? According to Denver-based NFL journalist Benjamin Allbright, the Buffalo Bills have shared with several people that Allen is the quarterback that they’re targeting. Additionally, Allbright says that one of his sources that informed him about the Bills interest in Allen also told him last year that the team was going after Nathan Peterman in last year’s draft, who of course is now on the Bills’ roster. Why the Bills should be enticed by Allen Besides Wentz, Allen could be the next Andrew Luck or Ben Roethlisberger - a big strapping passer to whom teams can feel comfortable handing over the keys to the franchise. For as much talk as there is about Allen potentially being taken No. 1 overall, there’s nearly as much chatter about him sliding a bit because of his stats, which gives the Bills a pretty good chance at landing the QB should they find a way to move into the top 5 of the draft order like it’s expected that they desire to. Why Allen should scare the them After finally returning to the playoffs after 17 years, it doesn’t seem like now is the ideal time for the Bills to take on a developmental project at quarterback, especially with AJ McCarron and Nathan Peterman as the only other quarterbacks on their roster. Furthermore, It doesn’t make sense for the Bills to have just traded away a steady performer in Tyrod Taylor just to then turn around and draft one of, if not this year’s biggest, boom-or-bust QB prospects.

see anything here? https://www.google.com/search?q=josh+allen&tbm=nws&source=univ&tbo=u&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjZndmdnJzaAhVJL6wKHYp8BMcQt8YBCDcoAQ&biw=681&bih=617 https://twitter.com/SI_PeterKing?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^news|twgr^author

it's all good dawg

not happening.

quick to have his back? no, just seeing some who, as your reply indicates, may feel based off his posts, they're a better person then he is. thanks for the reply. I can see how one could describe ones character based off a post but a message board really can be deceiving. you can sometimes overlook sarcasm and other possible misleading character signs. I'm not trying to defend Joe by any means, just an observation of those who tend to place themselves higher then him with the descriptions they give of how they see him as a person. at the end of the day, don't take everything your read at face value as you really don't know if he lives in his moms basement anymore then you know he lives in a mansion?

again, I have seen two describe him. yet when asked to describe ones self, the other has yet to respond so I ask you as I am very curious to know when one can describe how he/she sees said (Joe) poster, I would like to know how you would describe yourself? you don't need to include the good book or pews as I tend to overlook that.

you must of missed my post. I'm waiting for a good logical reply, if possible?

now that you have described him, can you describe yourself? I'd be curious how a better than thou describes ones self? edit: also, is your above post considered "of value"?

with much anticipation...

honestly I didn't see anyone furious but my eyes tend to deceive me sometimes. all good

it's you and your buddy taking those who called for him to be banned and/or looked as though it offended them when frankly, I read through those posts and saw it as joking with the joker. that said, the joke is on you two.