Jump to content

Jay_Fixit

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,976
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jay_Fixit

  1. This is true. But most of the time the receiver is avoiding contact because the throw is so low he has to catch it from laying down, or the receiver has to stop his route as the ball isn’t in stride.
  2. If this was top 3 spots, sure, I’d consider it something. But this guy is talking about 1/3 of the league. Top 10 spots.. Hell even SaviorPeterman could do that.
  3. It’s full of opinion as to what “better season” means. And the use of “turnovers” as a metric is obtuse. Especially without context. When you don’t move the football, like Tyrod doesn’t, that can be just as costly as these “turnovers” mentioned in that post. It’s a very bad post.
  4. I’m glad that the draught is over so if the Bills suck next year, I’ll be more accepting of it.
  5. Actually no. I also haven’t factored in a potential lack of “eye talent.”
  6. It’s not “hate mongering” so much as it is people using their eyes.
  7. Darnold - Franchise QB Mayfield - Franchise QB Rosen - Good NFL starter Jackson - Average starter/Backup Rudolph - Average starter/Backup Allen - Bust who will keep getting opportunities due to his talent and draft position. As for you being a Chiefs fan, I don’t think you have your QB at all. I think Mahomes is going to be a disaster.
  8. Tyrod is not accurate. When you only pull the trigger when a guy is wide open, it’s easy to complete passes. Tyrod needs to go.
  9. I’d argue that some of the food my wife makes tastes worse, so sure.
  10. Yup, Locker was my neighbour and I correctly predicted he’d be a top 10 pick. Have had Huskies seasons for years. As usual I was correct. Never once wanted him as a Bill though. If you remember. Me being correct. It happens a lot. If I were anyone on this board, I’d just follow whatever I said because it’s probably right.
  11. It’s subjective. I take it as a QB who’s passes weren’t as catchable as the others. Again, an easy bubble screen where a throw is high/low but the receiver “drops” it can be factored in here. It’s really just a poor throw. It’s a “stat” that can be manipulated to help an argument.
  12. I don’t care. How much Rosen have you watched? Because it sounds like it isn’t much.
  13. So did I. Question...how much Rosen have you watched? Not just from searching through Twitter/Youtube/Etc?
  14. Because I’m smart. That’s why. And I never said I don’t understand it. I understand what people think it means. It’s not quantifiable. And I’m going by what you think it means and Rosen doesn’t have as much as you think he does.
  15. He looks every bit the part of a franchise QB. From afar. However, his “football IQ” isn’t that good. Whatever that even means.
×
×
  • Create New...