4merper4mer

All of this makes sense but does not counter the premise. Maybe Chicago's offer increased after they were exposed by McCarron.

On point 2 I agree but on point 1 McCarron may have raised the price of poker. Maybe he could have been had for a 1 and a 2 until the Bears got nervous.

The situations are different with NHL and NFL trades. The Bills trades may not be perfect but I don't remember Kelvin Benjamin getting drunk and running over a Tim Horton's. I can't blame Beane for this and I'm not even saying the Bills should have offered as much as the Bears, especially considering the contract. But if the Bears thought about having a defense where they could be beaten by McCarron and where Foster could actually make a catch? That is not good. In the long run it might have helped us or hurt us. We'll see.

AJ's spectacular comeback vs the Da Bears may have convinced them that Mack was a necessity and caused them to up their offer, leapfrogging the Bills. McDermot should have put in Logan Thomas for Q4.

Auburn is in the SEC so they can blast QBs in the head no problem.

Part one is what I thought but I'm not sure I said it. Part 2 you made up. I said nothing about Coleman making the team. Quitter

Do drops count as touches because technically......?

I see no point in bashing McCarron. Personally I prefer they keep 3 and am fine with whichever one starts. The thought of keeping Foster is absurd.

What do you want to bet that he came back from that trip bragging to Billy C about how he got laid, when he really only got leid?

Pacific? It's bigger.

His wrong what?

I don't see people piling on AJ McCarron. I've seen McDermott catch balls out of bounds and he doesn't cost a roster spot.

If they can't pick up Penn in a trade from Oakland I say they cut Teller.

He looks more like a muppet than 72% of muppets look like a muppet. But your avatar has him beat.

Jesus freaks want you to spill your Coke on your lap!

New England should do it, then get caught cheating again on purpose and lose those picks, thus screwing Oakland into trading Mack for nothing.

Before the smart phone, what was the threat to Microsoft's dominance and how did free computers to schools squelch it?

All of that stuff I listed......don't you think the FBI agent might have some cursory knowledge of it? If so, why wouldn't he add " .....and that sure was lucky because that server was just begging to be hacked.". When that is left out people are supposed to infer that there is nothing to see or that it all worked out ok, despite living in the real world letting them know how ridiculous that premise sounds. People think others can't figure things out on their own, and sometimes that is correct. Omissions were a much better tool just a few years ago, but their value as a tactic diminishes every day because more and more information is available than ever used to be. It is almost as if Adam Smith understood human nature.

Define generation and define industry. And what do you think I meant when I said "these things have a way of taking care of themselves"?

What makes you say that?

I know right. Every kid I see now just can't take their eyes off their Windows CE powered phone.

OMG dude one of your Patriots killed a guy. Just stop.

You're just now wondering? Beane got snookered on this one. Murphy clearly has no intent to ever play again and he got his last contract by pretending he did. Get over thinking he is going to help in any way. Even if the Bills coerce him out there he will just fake something.

Nixon has an x in her name, as did Marx. That was the tiebreaker.

Shirley you can't be serious. Just being alive in 2018 every single person is subjected on a daily basis to attempts at getting their information. You only need to make one mistake, sometimes not even one, and you are compromised. The people after you can be buffoonish or sophisticated but they are not the top dogs. What level of sophistication do you think goes into trying to get at State secrets? Again, some of this is buffoonish but some is ultra sophisticated. We know that Podesta fell for one of the buffoons which exposed the domain name "clintonemail". I'd bet $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ that the domain name was well known long before the DNC hack. Couple that with the also known facts that this server was first in her house, then in a bathroom, and never encrypted, and ask yourself honestly, using your own personal experience, if the statement that there was no evidence it had been hacked passes the smell test. One possibility is that it had been hacked and the trail was covered up by the hackers or someone else. I suppose this is plausible if you hit your head on the pavement while descending from the turnip truck. The other is similar to believing that there was once a gigantic pot of gold sitting in the middle of Times Square, and rainbows from all across the land terminated at the top of it, but we all just walked by and didn't touch it despite all of us desiring gold more than anything else. England, France, Germany, Russia, China, Israel, Iran, Mexican cartels, India, Pakistan, and many independent organizations all likely had a taste. If she hadn't had a private server, there would have been fewer, but not none. I get that asking the queen to follow the rules is simply unacceptable, but at least don't throw Occum's Shaver out the window.