4merper4mer

The 4th line above refers to sitcom math. The 5th was on display at the Kavanagh hearings. Something new: Not Yeti

WTF Dude. Dat's raysis. Oh wait, did you mean Roberts is the only non bald dude?

Hauschka you come to that conclusion?

That's because of your weird tastes. Kelly Osbourne, Thurman Sewell, and the nerd computer guy for the matrix, aren't just obscure, they don't even do the same things. And only Sewell even wears a helmet. And I hate to break it to you but the stretchy guy for the fantastic four isn't real, he is an actor.

Losing Preston Brown for Edmunds has moved us down past roughly one third of the league aggregate? I find it interesting that they project the worst records to be 6-10. Are the best 10-6?

2 questions: 1. Does anyone think that ESPN has ever once ranked an NHL, NBA, MLB, or NFL team that made the playoffs the previous year as last overall when making predictions the following year? The only one I can think of as a possibility is the Florida Marlins a while back when they had an all out purge. We lost Preston Brown, Eric Wood and Tyrod Taylor. This is just ridiculous and based on nothing. 2. If last year's roster played for another franchise, let's call it the Titans for argument's sake, had identical 2017 results and made identical offseason moves to us, would they get moved to 32 by ESPN? That is highly doubtful to me. Their rankings are uniform dependent. It's the Bills so 32. Titans, move them to 22. Steelers, they'd be ranked 8. Jets? 14. Cards? 26. Pats? Next 9 Super Bowls are in the bag.

So at least 6 more teams?

If you concede White then we have the average number of top 100 players. Still, that may not be the best way to judge. How many Pats in the top 100? Please take into account that Pedelman is missing 4 games. He wasn't interesting to the Cowboys and they have a strong line. They saw enough to not even give him a PS spot. Common man. Teams have cornerbacks.

All of this makes sense but does not counter the premise. Maybe Chicago's offer increased after they were exposed by McCarron.

On point 2 I agree but on point 1 McCarron may have raised the price of poker. Maybe he could have been had for a 1 and a 2 until the Bears got nervous.

The situations are different with NHL and NFL trades. The Bills trades may not be perfect but I don't remember Kelvin Benjamin getting drunk and running over a Tim Horton's. I can't blame Beane for this and I'm not even saying the Bills should have offered as much as the Bears, especially considering the contract. But if the Bears thought about having a defense where they could be beaten by McCarron and where Foster could actually make a catch? That is not good. In the long run it might have helped us or hurt us. We'll see.

AJ's spectacular comeback vs the Da Bears may have convinced them that Mack was a necessity and caused them to up their offer, leapfrogging the Bills. McDermot should have put in Logan Thomas for Q4.

Auburn is in the SEC so they can blast QBs in the head no problem.

Part one is what I thought but I'm not sure I said it. Part 2 you made up. I said nothing about Coleman making the team. Quitter

Do drops count as touches because technically......?

I see no point in bashing McCarron. Personally I prefer they keep 3 and am fine with whichever one starts. The thought of keeping Foster is absurd.

What do you want to bet that he came back from that trip bragging to Billy C about how he got laid, when he really only got leid?

Pacific? It's bigger.

His wrong what?

I don't see people piling on AJ McCarron. I've seen McDermott catch balls out of bounds and he doesn't cost a roster spot.

If they can't pick up Penn in a trade from Oakland I say they cut Teller.

He looks more like a muppet than 72% of muppets look like a muppet. But your avatar has him beat.

Jesus freaks want you to spill your Coke on your lap!

New England should do it, then get caught cheating again on purpose and lose those picks, thus screwing Oakland into trading Mack for nothing.

Before the smart phone, what was the threat to Microsoft's dominance and how did free computers to schools squelch it?