4merper4mer

These clues scream Prince but that dude does not look like Prince to me,.

That was a legit penalty on Carolina but the guy that Burns beat tackled him and injured him with no call.

Spoiler alert:. There aren't.

Bootsy Collins?

It might be Darius Rucker.

I understand that in terms of the 15 yards but to me a DQ for something unintentional is weird. If they DQEd the guy that kicked TB I'd be all for that.

Me too. I thought the DQ was harsh because I wasn't sure of the intent there. The trip that set the whole thing up was dirty as heck.

Leon Seals?

Court packing literally renders a branch of government moot and that is far more consequential than just about any of the other worry.

This isn't an official guess but do you know if Anne Hathaway is Jewish?

Also Springsteen

I'm not sure why that seemed so easy to me when most of them don't. I almost didn't answer because it seemed to easy to be true.

It's bad enough at PPP already without you stirring up the whole Flutie vs. Johnson thing again.

The left's definition of fair share has always been easily defined with one word: More

Springsteen?

That's not Lynda Carter is it?

If there was any conflict it would be undue influence of the exec on the legis. She had no ability to impact her own confirmation nor did Trump. It was in the hands of the Senate.

In what loony world? Trump stated his opinion. The Senate confirmed her.....not Trump. She most certainly did not confirm herself. Any appearance of impropriety would be based on SC judges "owing" something to those who nominated and confirmed them. What would be the expiration date on that? Would Sotomayor have to recuse because she knows what Obama thinks about a case?

Huh?

The brief also points out that the judicial rules governing lower federal court judges require recusal based on how his or her “participation in a given case looks to the average person on the street.” The standard is whether participation in a case might cause a reasonable person with knowledge of the circumstances to “harbor doubts about the judge’s impartiality.” That is certainly the case here. How did Trump rush the confirmation process? Also I have Josh Allen on my fantasy football team. Can you explain why he didn't get credit for the 6 field goals last week? I should have won my game but I lost.

On what basis should she recuse herself?

I was going to request more specifics in a PM but since you've made this general, I thought this might be a better place. Can you link to or quote the portion of the TOS that addresses "FIFY" type posts? My two cents on this currently is that it seems very hypersensitive, almost pathetic. Scratch the almost. This board just went through a long thread about how some things were handled. A large part of the thread was a discussion of the crap the board owner has to deal with. Fast forward to this thread and you're warning everyone not to subject you to lame jokes that literally hundreds of posters have encountered for years. Unlike you, they knew how to deal with. Further, your claims of potential harm caused by this childish yet common type of post are incredibly easy to refute as well as simply remedied. I think it is an intersting choice on your part to create a thread based in hypersensitivity and propose a remedy which is sensitive in no way whatsoever to the site owner who has clearly explained what a pain in the neck complaints like those threatened cause. On a secondary note I'm curious as to why you're so upset about people altering your words but not the words of others. I wouldn't expect you to go searching for incidents, but if you happen across a misquote of someone else, why not issue warnings and complaints about those too? I'm looking forward to the specific wording in the TOS that we need to avoid. Thanks in advance.

Update: I received my warning PM from SoTear. It was precisely as pathetic and sad as his OP made it sound. Further updates to follow.

Is there a more smug prick on the planet than Cody Bellinger?

TOS lol. If that particular part of the TOS were enforced most people would be gone from all of these boards. But by all means SoTear and the boys can whine for selective enforcement.