EmotionallyUnstable

Just based solely off tonight’s game: Penix can spin it from the pocket. Although I wonder what he would look like without guys running wide open and good pass pro. Doesn’t seem to have that natural ability to create. I don’t see anything elite from him.

Interesting hearing his comments on Gabe’s sloppy route running. Another reason he very likely won’t be back next year.

He’d be the Gabe in our offense. Could you imagine how many “player of the games” he’d get with 0 catches but ELITE BLOCKING

Siran Neal is annoying.

I feel like I’m watching 90s football lol

The bottom line: Based on his draft status that was wildly an overreach given the position and state of this team, fan expectations were always extremely high. He’s a good/quality runner with the ball, but by no means a top tier RB. Coaches and fans alike want him to be for a variety of reasons, but there are more reasons that he is not. This is okay, but please (to those people doing so) stop acting like he’s being fitted for a gold jacket and his limited usage is holding him back.

Love the hawks throwbacks. Cowboys are annoying.

Romo said they looked like they were playing man to man. To the field that appeared to be the case, but were the Eagles in C2 match to the boundary? Slay was on Diggs in the slot but passed off the out to the boundary corner to run with Davis.

So essentially it’s the same play with the difference between terminology based off of the defensive alignment? 7T DE would give you a duo but because they brought the safety into the C gap and showed a 9T you’re calling it ISO? Either way you’re getting a 2v2 game with the TE/WR on DE/S. In terms of calling this play, would they even distinguish a difference between the two, and simply use a single call with the defensive front and blocking rules indicating what the TE/WR are doing based on alignment? Interesting…I never thought of it as ISO since my ideas of the play generally consists of a FB or TE being the lead back but in this case it’s a WR

Diggs has been one of the best things to happen to the franchise in decades. They’ve rewarded him handsomely for it. Hope he lives it up and can churn out a few more good/great years for us and finally make it to the Big House….retire a Bill!

Any tips on give aways as to how this is distinguishable between duo and ISO? From what I saw, it appears we were getting two pairs of double teams working to the stacked backers. What is the iso component here? Is the ISO referring to the WR on the CB? Appreciate the info!

After rewatching the last Buffalo TD drive in the 4th quarter, it’s pretty interesting to see the progression of plays and how they stacked up: We saw a mix of Big 12 personnel with Edwards as well as 12 with Morris. Buffalo runs 4 straight duo runs into the Eagles 4 man front. Looks like the Davis motion causes change of strength for the LBs, as they flop with the motion across the center. Guys just do a good just of getting on bodies. The double teams on the stout DTs do just enough to allow for tight running lanes and the OL was getting to the second level cleanly handling the LBs. Make no mistake, they are not moving guys: just stale mates and that was enough. After 4 straight successful runs, the eagles counter by putting 5 DL on the field (unable to double all of these guys). Our play selection shifted (not sure if called or checked) and ended up running what looks to me like a mid zone concept. We weren’t nearly as successful here and guys just aren’t winning 1v1s. What was cool to see was how we took advantage of the 5 man front with a quick hitter screen to Diggs. After multiple plays of condensed looks, we stretched the field horizontally, jetting Davis and Dawkins out in a semi-jailbreak look. Additionally, it’s my belief that the TD was likely a result of such success in the ground game. The Lbs started cheating up and gain to much ground towards the LoS as they make their reads. #53 bites just enough on the mesh to open up the window on the bang to Davis. #24 is caught flat footed and roasted inside, having to cover the entire field from the far hash in man. A cool series of plays and an interesting back and forth from our offense. A few things that I’d like to know more about is why they like to condense these WR splits into the slot, and even behind the guard/tackle. What advantage do they feel they gain by bringing more bodies into the box? Additionally, I am curious as to why we saw so much success this drive with the duo runs out of the 12 big personnel and why we struggled to find similar gains with Kincaid in spread. Hoping to watch more tmrw. @HoofHearted

Hold your rant: I was correcting his assertion that it resulted in 3 points

Can they instead award him to the Bills?

Fields looks like he’s ready to cry. Loser

So was he a healthy scratch this week?

So THAT was intentional grounding. Yesterdays was not.

I posed a question to my Bills buddy, who has a pure hatred for McD and oddly enough, Dion Dawkins: ”Hey Joe, if you were in a room with McDermott, Dawkins and a gun with one bullet, which one of the three of you would you shoot?” “….Id just hand the gun to McDermott. He’d shoot himself in the foot.” 😂

Challenge.

You continue to miss my point. I am not blaming Allen in any way, or suggesting he was at fault for throwing a pick. I was simply highlighting that it is a team game, with countless situations, and no one should get a pass or have those issues looked over. For whatever reason, you want to defend Allen when I am not trying to attack him.

The Allen INT led to 7 pts

Curious to see how/why the heavy runs with 6 OL/Morris found so much success vs our spread run game. I plan to rewatch tmrw, so will try and get some thoughts down.

I agree on his performance today. But the fact of the matter is the L and the INT looms larger in the scheme of things. Voters will not weigh the almost-win into the equation. The fact Allen was 98% of our offense and played like an all-pro will be overshadowed by the box score warriors where statistics will support the narrative that Allen is eratic and turns the ball over (they will ignore the TDS, surrounding cast, circumstances of schedule; etc)

@ToGoGo why the disagree? Turnovers and our record are 100% the reason Allen won’t win.

77-895-2 Hes still a great player, but on the down swing. Hes got a few good years left, but the front office needs to address the hole at WR last year