What a Tuel

I have really hated the play calls for the last decade. We always seem to be throwing and running 4 yards behind the line of scrimmage.

They were on the field for 40 minutes. We couldn't sustain a drive. I don't excuse zero adjustments to our CB's getting burned every single play, but our offense couldn't sustain a single drive. 1 trip to the red zone all night and it was in the last minute of the game.

Not excusing the CB play, but the defense held pretty well for being on the field for pretty much 15 straight minutes in the first quarter.

So I see no names yet. So that means we are likely going to get another "Who?" aren't we?

Both of them. Darby and Gilmore. Getting burned on the outside every. single. play. Darby made a few nice plays on the ball, but he got lucky on one drop by Marshall and got burned many many more times. O Marshall X Darby OOOOOOOOOOOOO OO X?!?! XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

It's a video of Jerry Hughes. I'd butcher it explaining. Best off watching it.

Just 2 scandals that have lost the Patriots 2 1st round draft picks in 9 years, and financial penalties. But Rex Ryan's lap band. Now that's the real problem here! Now here's the key, the Rex Ryan sound bytes are not why we lose. The lack of sound bytes by Belichick are not why they win.

Nope. The board is unbearable after every loss. Yeah the Bills haven't been up to par, but the dumb jokes, the ridiculous POV's, and assignment of blame (If only we could get rid of Russ Brandon!) is a poor performance on our fans part on par with the bills. There's criticism and then there's legitimate football criticism. I know that is just how some fans deal with disappointment, but that doesn't mean I can't find it obnoxious and annoying when I am trying to watch a football game or look at a board and see fans bashing Rex for making a comment that has exactly zero to do with football. Get a grip guys.

Changing out Fitzpatrick for EJ Manuel didn't work? Well yeah, Fitzpatrick sucking does not increase the statistical probability that Manuel would be good. So no, changing out the pieces does not guarantee success, and it is ridiculous to assume not changing out one piece is the cause for our turmoil. Especially when no one can point to anything specific that he has done.

No I mean he changed the play and threw a TD to Antonio Brown instead because he saw 1on1 man coverage.

I saw Roethlisberger do this several times on 4th and 1 Monday Night. Not comparing just making an observation.

He is certainly guaranteed for a game ending pick in every close game. I called it Sunday against the Bengals haha. Bills sneak by the Jets 17-13

Could be a new record.

Yeah, I was really disappointed with Bennett's performance. I thought they would use him a lot more, but he was just out there blocking a lot. Maybe if Gronk plays, it will free him up or something, or maybe Belichick doesn't see that role for Bennett.

In the hysteria, no one is talking about this.

Jesus Christ. This is the one and only post I am making today because everyone is straight up unbearable.. You are acting smug. You know who else is "fragile"? Demaryius Thomas - hip injury Julio Jones - Tweaked his ankle Keenan Allen - Torn ACL There is no such thing as injury prone. It's the NFL and injuries happen. Sammy has missed less games than most WR's but our Buffalo bias makes us act like douchebags to our own players.

Let it go man. 1 pass thrown to Sammy in two series. I guess you could call that a lack of a connection. I call it 6 plays though.

Really? Is this suspension worthy or something? Why would he bother lying? Man up and admit you were protesting. Geez.

Yes there was. Time Warner was awful. They opted to make improvements, and increase speeds to compete with the new competition. Once Verizon ran out of the money it had allocated to building the network it stopped. Now they maintain a decent market share. We are conflating issues here though. Net neutrality isn't a take over of the internet. It is doing exactly the below. The only one I can imagine you having a problem with is paid prioritization which in my opinion we will just have to agree to disagree on. You think these network builders should be able to charge a premium for a "fast lane", I think it is a dangerous precedent that would only get worse in conjunction with data caps, and time. We already see it with the "watch our affiliate content with unlimited data" on mobile and Comcast experimenting with data caps in other areas. What is stopping them from saying "Watch our affiliate content, it is faster!" (obviously simplified). It is obvious you think that is fair for them to do that since they built the infrastructure, I don't believe it is fair because their consumers are paying for a distinct service, and not the type of service the ISP's desire to provide based on what is more profitable for them. No Blocking: broadband providers may not block access to legal content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices. No Throttling: broadband providers may not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices. No Paid Prioritization: broadband providers may not favor some lawful Internet traffic over other lawful traffic in exchange for consideration of any kind—in other words, no "fast lanes." This rule also bans ISPs from prioritizing content and services of their affiliates.

That is not true. Verizon sued the moment the FCC put forward the open internet order (net neutrality) for not having the regulatory authority or jurisdiction to regulate the internet. The court ruled that the FCC did not have that authority. The FCC gained that authority and survived subsequent lawsuits by reclassifying the internet as a utility. As for Verizon I don't mind at all that Verizon stopped building it's network. It sucks that it fell short of my area, but I have no sense of entitlement to it. The thing about that is that Time Warner Cable is entrenched in the area. Verizon took a bunch of money and built up its network. They dove in and it is great in areas that offer both choices. However they won't continue building their network because of how entrenched Time Warner Cable is, and how it can stand to simply increase speeds, and lower prices at the hint of any sort of competition. So it just isn't worth it to Verizon at this point. So, yes it is quite annoying that I am stuck with Time Warner Cable as my only choice and no competition or innovation is taking place in my area. It would be awesome if Google laid down fiber in our area, but it won't be happening. In the areas they are, you see the current ISP's scrambling to up their speeds, and lower prices though. Especially with their 1000 mbps connection.

Then we agree to disagree.

They had to do this as a result of court challenges by ISP's saying that the FCC did not have the regulatory authority to impose net neutrality. If all you are referring to is the precedent the FCC is setting then fine, but do you really have a problem with the below? No Blocking: broadband providers may not block access to legal content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices. No Throttling: broadband providers may not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices. No Paid Prioritization: broadband providers may not favor some lawful Internet traffic over other lawful traffic in exchange for consideration of any kind—in other words, no "fast lanes." This rule also bans ISPs from prioritizing content and services of their affiliates.

My god the logical leaps Ted Cruz makes. It is painful. Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, whoever make their own policies and censor what they want already. They don't need government permission because you agree to their terms from the start. Take this for example. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-norway-primeminister-idUSKCN11F194 Ever hear Ted Cruz commission on NASA? The guy has a continued agenda and frames his arguments around it without letting facts get in his way. (This is how we got Trump as a nominee btw) To each their own. I can say that the truth is somewhere in the middle between content creators and ISP's, but net neutrality is not some government takeover of the internet. But we can agree to disagree.

Whatever you guys say. I am comfortable in my knowledge of the subject.

I wish we wouldn't take any game for granted. This will be a hard fought win just like any other.