yall

It would appear that indeed I am...

I'm guessing at least one less than there are people who can't detect sarcasm...

Take your devil worshiping avatar and go back to Russia, commie.

Actually I'm quite familiar with the whole regression toward the mean, 3.5 meme around here. Just as I'm familiar with the brain cramps one is prone to suffer while trying to parse one of your posts. All true Catholics enjoy mass.

I guess I haven't seen th big lebowski in a while...

Time served.

Thanks for the tip. You wanna help with me ethnic self-identity crisis too? I've actually had a number of conversations with people regarding "what it means to be catholic". The argument could be easily made that since most people who claim to be catholic no longer beleive in the infallibility of the pope or transubstantiation, that they aren't really catholic. But I'm sure a large swath of them would take offense if you told them they weren't "real" Catholics. At that point maybe you've become "generic Christian with catholic tendencies". I like to think that the mentality of the adherents is simply outpacing the bureaucracy, and one can still be catholic and ignore some of the silly bits. Considering that's practically required when you consider all of the inconsistencies in the bible (not to mention the haphazard way in which the bible itself was put together; include this, exclude that, all by human hand and a healthy dose of politics) it's a pretty easy leap for someone to make.

Just to be sure, you're referring to me as insecure? If so, I think you've misunderstood me. I'm catholic and a registered republican. But I don't go telling people that my god is right, and they are wrong. I believe, but I don't know. My beliefs are (with exceptions and caveats) no more or less rational than any others. Certain religions and systems of belief are superior to others, be they in principle or practice. But none can logically lay claim to the truth.

Why is he my god? Because the book your parents gave you says so? You should be glad you weren't born to a Shinto or Hindi family, otherwise you may have grown up worshiping the wrong deity. You'd better remember to kneel down and pray to our god for bestowing such grace and good fortune upon you. He must like you. This thread is chock full of stupid.

Maybe they wanted to find out if he could tackle or cover a receiver.

Also Derek, not talking jets game here...

But the D was worse. That's the point that seems to be lost in the din.

Have you considered the fact that if the D hadn't sucked so bad, the offense wouldn't have been in that position? It just seems strange that as badly as the defense played, that the QB is the focal point. Sure, he could have done better (understatement) on the last two possessions, but he wouldn't have even had to if the defense wasn't a total sieve for 50:00 minutes.

Because some people clearly need education, and DC Tom must be on vacation.

Simply put; this would have been a relevant thread after 2 (possibly 3 or even 4) games this year. Today? It's flat out dumb.

You are putting words into my mouth. I've not tried to absolve anyone, but rather point out that the play of the D was far worse than the QB. Ignore reality all you want, it's the absolute truth.

Christ on a crutch. My point is that the D is the bigger problem. Not saying fitz s great, or even good. But for !@#$s sake, if you can't stop ****ty teams from scoring, what do you people expect?

You say I keep dodging your point, but you completely ignore the fact that while the D held up one !@#$ing time, they didn't hold up during 3/4's of the game and basically allowed the opposition to score at will. So yeah, live in your retarded fantasy world where 11 dudes who couldnt stop one of the worst teams in the league are somehow less responsible than he guy who threw 3 touchdowns.

What is the worst part about our QB was how he allowed the Titans QB, RB, and #1 WR to have their best day of the season. Cut that jerk. How many tackles must he have whiffed on for them to put up those kind of stats and only win by one point?

This thread is straight up retarded. How many punts did we force today? Not defending fitz at all, but if it's the QB play you're upset with, then you need an education in football.

Hey let's keep blaming the QB for the defense not being able to stop the blood from a paper cut.

All they had to do was run. So incredibly bad.

Wow. Fire Gailey.

That third time out would be great now.

Embarrassing. Fire someone now. Don't care who. Waterboy, coach, busty chick in PR department. Scratch that. Don't fire her.