Actually instead of releasing his tax docs as promised, the Don just called the WH Press Secretary a "loser".
Honestly, I think Trump is drumming up ratings and sabotaging the GOP hopes (as if any existed) for 2012.
This won't settle people down either. Now they will focus on proving the document is some type of forgery.
If the accusation were that Obama was a green blooded alien, and he cut himself on live TV with a knife to show red blood, these people would simply state that the aliens have figured out a way to change the color of their blood.
"They is more cleverer than we'd thunk!"
I'm gonna go ahead and guess it some function lower of poverty levels, lower unemployment rates, higher education levels, and culture.
But then again, that shouldn't really be considered groundbreaking or earth shattering information.
I have to say I was always surprised that when confronted about their rational very little attention was given to the fact that Saddam was a direct material supporter of terrorism (i.e. money to Palestinian suicide bombers families).
Ah, but the nicer parts of Ontario with the best fishing are in Jefferson. Essex has Placid, Essex and Clinton have Champlain. The river (St. Lawrence) is entirely within St. Lawrence and Jefferson counties.
I'd rather we sawed off long Island or just let Jersey have it.
Only if we can also throw in a deal to trade SU for the Huskers.
You obviously need a geography lesson, as aside from the finger lakes, everything I mentioned is in one of the six northernmost counties.
Nice try though.
While I'm not opposed like I used to be (to UHC) it's the hard handed approach and the implementation itself I disagree with. And I've read a few of the supporting arguments in cases where it's been upheld, and the logic is pretty specious. Along the lines of "well it's important and it affects all 50 states, therefore, the Feds get to regulate it".
I realize the Feds abuse the interstate commerce clause for a good many things, some that appear to be valid, others not so much. But I'm having a hard time understanding what part of the 14th supports the health care mandate (the recent decision notwithstanding). Could someone explain, even in vague terms how the commerce clause is being cited to support this?