Jump to content

hondo in seattle

Community Member
  • Posts

    10,514
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hondo in seattle

  1. Yep. Worrying about our #5 passing target on a run-first team seems a little silly.
  2. I don't agree with the ad hominen attack (there's no reason to call fellow Bills fans fools). But you are right with Mario's choices. And this is why his fellow players complained about Mario - he made the worst possible choice. Rex talks in his MMQB article about other players who have played for him that did their non-glamorous assignments without complaint and it's a fair point. I do believe that the coaching staff should find ways to bring out the best in each player. Rex and Dennis failed with Mario last year and deserve some of the blame. But that doesn't excuse Mario. His behavior was immature and not good for the team. He needed to be cut.
  3. Besides teaching them football, Buddy apparently taught his boys self-confidence. Man, those two talk big! I'm not predicting greatness and I'm not predicting failure. I will predict that it'll be interesting.
  4. Look up the "Pygmalion Effect." When leaders believe in their people, they tend to perform better. And when people believe in themselves, they tend to perform better (sometimes called the "Galatea Effect."). These two generalities have been proven in numerous studies in a number of different environments. Let's add a third observation: when people believe in the plan, they perform better. I think these are the things Rex is looking for. I don't think Rex meant that he wants a culture where there's no constructive criticism. Having read Collision Low Crossers, I don't think he's that kind of guy. More than once in his career, General Patton said something to the effect, "If 10 men are thinking alike, 9 of them aren't thinking." If Rex is in fact looking for group-think and yes-men, you're right, he's not going to build a winning environment.
  5. Is it just me, or did he seem at a loss for words more often than he used to be? I wish we went to, and won, as many Super Bowls as he predicted.
  6. I saw him minutes after his retirement was announced by the Seahawks. He stormed out of the event we we were at. No one in his entourage was smiling. I couldn't help but wonder if there was a causal relationship between the announcement and his apparent mood. It might have been coincidence.
  7. It's interesting to see Mike Mularkey dead last at #32. Things could be worse!
  8. Middle of the pack... seems about right, though I hope he proves the doubters wrong this year.
  9. Only 1 of the 11 receivers behind Watkins and Woods needs to emerge as a competent third option. I actually think, with this group, that the odds are pretty good. But only time will tell.
  10. Sanjay is not a dynamic, compelling speaker. But the interview was interesting when Murph asked Sanjay about the WRs one by one. Speaking of the wideouts behind Watkins and Woods: "They're good, legitimate NFL receivers."
  11. I'm not sure if I'm an OOO or a NNN. For 4 or 5 years in a row, I predicted 7-9 finishes until succumbing to the Kool-Aid last year and predicting 10-6. This year I'm waffling between 9-7 and 8-8. Though I don't typically predict a winning record, I confess that I have in different posts defended Russ, Marv, DW and Rex - as well as almost any QB to line up under center in a Bills uni. Truth be told, I may have even defended Dick Juaron once or twice. And, as painful as it is to admit, it's possible I embraced the hiring of St. Doug. Fandom, it seems, can wreak havoc on objective, analytical thinking.
  12. John, this is a fair point. My guess is that Rex has spoken to Kromer and/or the medical staff about Henderson. But that's not what he was asked. He was asked if he had personally spoken to Henderson and he answered to the negative. It might be that Rex doesn't really want to address the issue and didn't volunteer what Kromer and/or the medical staff told him. Since we don't really know what's going on behind the scenes, I suspend judgment. I expect a coach to be honest. I don't expect him to be fully forthcoming and transparent. For the good of the team, there are things that ought not be shared with the media.
  13. The Bleacher Report article on Doug's statement is linked on CNN's headline page. In the B/R article there's a poll and so far 76% of respondents agree with DW. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2642137-bills-gm-doug-whaley-comments-on-violence-in-football-injuries-and-more?utm_source=cnn.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=editorial
  14. How many players are under contract right now? Something like 90? There's a reason teams have coordinators, position coaches, and - sometimes - assistant position coaches. Because a Head Coach can't by himself keep track of - and give personal attention to - that many players. I don't think Rex is the best HC but I don't blame him for not keeping in touch with all his players during the off-season. Other people are paid to do that.
  15. It's an odd thing for an NFL GM to say. But obviously the human body didn't evolve to withstand an activity as violent as football. We're not built for that kind of punishment, thus the injuries. It's hard to blame DW for pointing out the obvious. Are the critics suggesting Whaley should be less forthcoming with his honest opinions and less transparent?
  16. Yep, his mediocrity with YPPT is a "death blow." Yet the Jets made it to the AFC Championship games in 2009 and 2010. If not on the strength of Rex's defense, did the Jets pass their way to the AFC Championship games on the strength of Sanchez's arm? In those years, the Jets D was ranked #1 and #3 respectively in yards allowed - but only #8 and #14 in YPPT. So which stat more accurately predicts the success the Jets enjoyed those years. There are so many stats out there, if you want us to (1) believe YPPT better correlates to winning than the others, and (2) YPPT shows Rex will be a failure in Buffalo, I think you need to make a stronger argument. Personally, I'm a simple guy. As I see it, other teams try to gain yards on their way to scoring points. For a long while (Baltimore included), Rex was good at fielding defenses that made it difficult for other teams to gain those yards. So I'm cautiously optimistic about Rex's ability to run a good D in Buffalo.
  17. Maybe so. But since the phone was destroyed, it's not incriminating at all. Thus, no lifetime ban. I think Brady is fighting as much to protect his legacy as to avoid the suspension.
  18. “I never even talked to the kid, so we’ll see what happens. He won’t return a call. Is it him not wanting to be a Bill, or is it something else? I don’t know, but I guess there’s a reason Pittsburgh let him go [last November]. But when you find something out, let us know, because I’ve never even talked to him.”​ http://www.si.com/nfl/2016/05/20/bills-injuries-rex-ryan-doug-whaley-sammy-watkins?xid=si_social
  19. “We look at it like we have two first-round picks this year, Shaq Lawson and Reggie Ragland. Because we were going to pick Reggie Ragland at No. 19 if Shaq wasn’t there, and then we got them both. So for us, we’re playing with house money.”
  20. Considering we're a run first team, I'm okay with our WR/TE roster as long as Watkins returns 100% before the season begins and we stay reasonably healthy thereafter. I'd like to see the Bills sign Roberts to compete for the #3 position and potentially help as a return man... But I don't think Andre Roberts will make anyone forget the other Andre R.
  21. If the "media completely ignores this," did you find out for yourself by driving around the country checking for mascot names? Or did you learn it in the media? I respect your point of view. While we can argue numbers, certainly a substantial percentage of Native Americans do not consider the word offensive. So do we just say FU to the ones that do? Or can we respect their point of view, too?
  22. Did Roberts really post his own highlight vid? He mostly looks like Just Another Guy to me. A good #3? Maybe.
  23. If you called me an a**hole, or any other insulting word, I wouldn't feel offended because my self-esteem is internal and not based on what you say. But calling another human being 'a**hole' is wrong nonetheless. What if only 10% of blacks said the 'N" word was offensive? Would it then be okay to use it as a team nickname? What if only 10% of Hispanics felt offended by the pejorative "sp*c." Could we then name a NFL club with that term? This poll, and questions of methodology aside, the "Redsk*n" name remains wrong.
  24. ? Ffffff fffff Prevent PDF.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...