Green Lightning

It's an affront when the writers and radio losers do no thinking or analysis but simply p*ss and moan and slam anything and everything. So what if the Jets sign a fading LT? Why is that evidence that our FO inherently sucks? Sully, Schopp and the like don't think, they react - and p*ss on anyone who dares think all is not so awful. Effete and negative to enrage the bulls I suppose. I like to engage in honest criticism but they confuse criticism for character assasination. It's like listening to Rush interview Glenn Beck for days at a time. Enough - it cant be all so terrible!

That sums it up perfectly. Jerry's in the entertainment business, not journalism. And he knows you draw more flies with sh*t than sugar. He is very smart and very good writer but a far better self promoter and entertainer for his employers.

I read the article, of course it's a Bill's employee writing it. But I did get the sense that the easy. country-club, no-hit training camp days are over. Seems like Chan likes to get physical and teach that at camp. I like that.

When it becomes devoid of analysis and research into why something is done and becomes a constant blare of negativity because the FO does something the media deems wrong. If we don't sign a QB in the first round....we suck.....blah, blah. They don't report, the B word.

Whatever. Yet another reason why this board hates Peter King. His research is superficial and he writes whatever everyone else is saying. I don't take him seriously, but frankly I like where he has us. He's wrong and it will be a fun ride to see where we finish.

He was a beast at DT back in the day. At Six-Five, 277 a prototypical DE in a modern 3-4. http://www.buffalorumblings.com/

What columns are you reading? "Positive" and Sully don't mix! I've read Felser for many decades. He dished out criticism when it was called for and kudos when things went well. He never had the corrosive, ridiculing and Ad Hominem ways of Sullivan. Sully is the little cloud that cried and enjoys p*ssing in everyone's cheerios daily. And it's a shame he's such in a negative funk because he's very smart and often right. There's no need to be the downward spiral he's become.

I remember Felser in his heydey and he called as he saw them...but was never as dripping, sour and incessently negative as Sullivan. Sully never has a good day where things go right. Felser had plenty of them.

Jeez Gabe do you ever have a day that's not full of 3-4 linebacker woe or ill will against the FO? Relax, I think the kids are alright!

Yeah, Chan should pull all the TV's out of McFaddens tonight! Great thread. Put me in the "surprised as Hell" column if Wood can come back this soon after that brutal injury!

Here's another vote for paragraphs. It's a return key - lower right side of the keyboard. Also try grammar with sarcasm. It's "you're" not "your" for crying out loud!

I sit corrected!

Debacled? I'm guess I have no choice but to be debacling your post......

I wouldn't be surprised to see us keep all three. Chan wants to pound the ball and throw a short passing game ala Brady and the Pats. Slants, sidelines and slot stuff to Spiller will be featured. It's not a bad way to establish a new offense and to make the Bills a tough team to play. Pounding Jackson, Lynch and changing up with Spiller is going to be fun to watch.

Long thread for naught. This is not that hard to figure out. They wanted Spiller, he was there, everyone had him well ahead of the other running backs and they took him. Story over. As for the quick decision and short time to make the Spiller pick, why not? If there was going to be a deal done, they would have had it done already. Buddy knows what he wanted and he wanted Spiller and not Best. If Best were the better back, Buddy would have no issue reaching to get him (ala Troup) so really, what's so hard to figure about this? Let's play and settle it.

Preview and stockpile of names for next year's lockout.

How a about avoiding this board because because you are obviously incapable of rational thought and you lower the IQ of TSW with each post.

Wow, this reads like the condensed version of the complete works of Jerry Sullivan! You'd think there would be one thing that is right with the team but I guess not.

Look, JW didn't vote and didn't condone cheating! He merely said the AP was within its right to re-poll the NON-AP writers for a recount. Those writers were wrong, but the AP wasn't and JW shouldn't be beat up by people like you that won't read the damn facts! People like you ran off Tim Graham from our board, so back the Hell off and think before you write.

We'll it's hard (damn, there it is again) I mean, difficult to ignore when My-Yahoo's headline on my sports section is "Buffalo's Wang Big in China." I defy anyone reading that without an eye-roll.

Sports journalists (sorry JW) to America: It's okay to cheat. I guess Barry Bonds' record is safe.

The naysayers have yet to hit this post. They will be handwringing over the fact that we have but two players who have ever a played in a 3-4 and some who are moving from DL to LB, etc. They have a point. But defense is defense. Beat your man (or men in a 2 gap) and make a play. We will make mistakes at first, that's fine. But for the first time in a long, long time, we will not bet blown off the line of scrimmage and dominated physically. I like what is happening and really look forward to seeing this team become a tough bunch to play instead of pushovers.

So if I follow: Poke in eye > Kick in the nads. Therefore, Ellis > Maybin. Mathmatically I think this truly reflects the material world of OLB's on the 2010 Buffalo Bills defense. Wouldn't it be a kick in the nads if Batten > Maybin?

Do you cut and paste that response in every thread? I've read it about six times today. Relax, it's still football and two gap or one gap, it's beat your guy and make a play.

You're a better man than me. I was just going to say something like...you seriously started a thread with a "why don't we trade Marshawn even up for Gaither? Really? Only if they through in Flacco....