OldTimer1960

No, I was HOPING for WR. While Goodwin might be very very fast, he has not produced much at the collegiate level in terms of pass receptions.

I don't disagree that he might be helpful on a few plays a game, particularly on handoffs on the end around. My problem is that he hasn't been productive at WR and didn't even put up particularly good kick return numbers in spite of his obvious speed. I'd have preferred Hugh Thornton (OG) or Quinton Patton (WR) who was productive in college.

I am somewhat disappointed with this pick. He is clearly very very fast, but didn't do much at Texas either as a WR or a kick returner. Not sure I see what good his speed is if he doesn't catch passes or return kicks well....

Damn, wanted Keenan Allen and Chargers just took him.

Not much left at TE other than Mark Furstenburg, but might be too high for him. Maybe Chris Gragg from Arkansas. Wouldn't mind another WR here. Keenan Allen must not be fully healthy to still be available, but if it is just a matter of waiting for him to recover, I think he could be a great pick. Quinton Patton is also interesting here as is Terrance Williams. OL prospects include - oops Brian WInters just went. Hugh Thornton (OG), Terron Armstead is a true ATHLETE and could eventually play OT. David Bakhtiari, David Quessenberry (OG) LB: Quanterus Smith Could really want a CB, but I don't see much left Safety has been really picked over

I think I'd have preferred TE Gavin Escobar who went with the next pick, but this guy is supposed to be a very good athlete with the ability to cover TEs down the field. With his off-field problems, I am sure they did their homework. He is supposed to have a big passion for the game....

I am very happy with this pick! Woods is smooooooth and started as a Freshman at USC.

Bummer, I was hoping to nab him. Still Gavin Escobar and a couple of good WRs available.... Hopefully, they make it to our pick

I'd be pretty psyched with 2 of the following: WR: Keenan Allen, Robert Woods, Justin Hunter, Quinton Patton TE: Gain Escobar, Zach Ertz, Vance McDonald (better in round 3) OL: Terron Armstead (OT), Larry Warford (OG), Manelik Watson (OT) DE: Tank Carradine, Margus Hunt LB: Manti Te'o, Kevin Minter, Arthur Brown, Corey Lemonier DB: Jamar Taylor, Jonathan Banks (CB)

While I would like to help the defense, I think the play is to take the best WR and best TE they think is available in round two. Their pick of: WR: Keenan Allen, Quinton Patton, Robert Woods, Aaron Dobson, Justin Hunter TE: Gavin Escobar, Zach Ertz, Vance McDonald Based on what my favorite sources say about these guys, I'd love Keenan Allen (if healthy) and Gavin Escobar, but there appear to be several good prospects at those two positions that most analysts think highly of.

As has been pointed out, none of us knows - even the pros are wrong a lot when evaluating QBs. I picked Ryan Nassib. My rationale is that he elevated his team to a level above their talent level, had them improving as the season wore on, is reported to be very driven, succeeded under a lot of defensive pressure. In short, his intangibles seem very positive.

I like Dobson as a possible Bills' pick, too, but I don't like your description: "covered when hes not type of receiver". I think you meant "open when he's not type of receiver".

I think of him as way too small to last very long. Have to get him the ball relatively close to the line as he'll get lost down field at his size. He MIGHT be great, but I'd rather have a "normal sized" prospect than swinging for the fences with a VERY undersized guy. Austin would not be a favorite pick for me. I think it is too risky given his lack of size.

A glimmer of hope: Fitzgerald had 9, 8 and 8 catches in the three games before Kolb was injured against the Bills. Kolb did not return after that and Fitzgerald struggled.

I would not be upset if they don't take one. My view is IF they think any of these guys are good starting QB material, then they should just take that guy at 8. If not, then I don't see too much value in taking one in the 2nd or 3rd just to say they took one. In a league that is very QB-starved, if any of the teams think these guys can play they will get picked early. With all due respect to the "but, Kaepernick, Dalton and Wilson went in round 2 (3 for Wilson)" argument, those are extremely rare examples that happened to have been clustered in a 2 year period. Further, while all looked good so far, the book isn't closed on any of those guys. I wonder what Dalton would look like without a truly elite WR in Green and who knows if defenses will find a way to make life a lot harder for Russell Wilson... I do think Kaepernick is likely to continue his success. I think the actions of KC, Oak, Ariz and Buffalo acquiring veteran options speaks volumes about what the NFL scouts think of these QBs. That being said, Smith, Nassib, Manuel, Barkley and Wilson all have some positives that might allow them to be successful in the right situation. I do think that Buddy Nix is blowing smoke when he says that there are 2 or 3 guys in this draft that will be very good starting QBs.

Or guys that stop others from scoring TDs...

Justin Pugh will likely go by early round 2 based on what I am reading and hearing. I would be leery of Mathieu in early round 3 mostly because of his very signicant off field problems and because he is quite undersized. He could top out as a good nickel corner - would need to be great to do more at his size.

I wouldn't be too happy to move down that far unless we got significant compensation and then traded up from 23 again. Example 23 and Vikings' 2nd for 8, then 23 and our 3rd for a pick in the top 15. Even then, I wouldn't mess around. If they like a QB enough to think he is the answer as a good starter, take him at 8. If not, then take the best player at another position - you could consider moving down at that point.

DTs often take a couple of years to show their stuff in the NFL and Troup has been healthy only his rookie year. Look, I don't want to completely let the Bills off the hook for the pick, but he has A LOT of what you look for in a DT: strength, effort, reasonable athleticism... Nobody could have predicted that he'd get hurt. Aaron WIlliams falls into the same category as the OL about whom they say "try him at LT until he proves he can't play it and then move him to RT/G". Of course, not all of those guys pan out and it is no certainty that Aaron Williams will be a good safety. But, I think his skills will translate well there - he was a below average cover corner, but should be a good coverage safety and he does play the run with passion. I just choose to "put myself in the Bills' shoes" and give them the benefit of the doubt. I also try to be realistic with regard to the true success rate of picks by round. Even at the top or round 2, you statistically only have about a 65% probability of finding a good 5+ year starter. See the link below for supporting data... http://www.draftmetrics.com/files/draftposition19922011.pdf

Interesting... I think that by far the most important factors of QB success are: * leadership * determination/dedication (the "first in the bldg, last out") * quick decision making - ability to process what he sees and make decisions on where to go with the ball in a split second. * toughness .... * arm strength - MUST have a minimum level for success, but above that it isn't that important. * athletic ability - great to have Cam/RG 3, Kaepernick speed and elusiveness, but nothing without the above. Of course there are other factors, but I believe the above are the main things. Note that most of them are VERY difficult to assess in on-field tape review and even in interviews. It is HARD to find a good QB - that is why so many QB draft picks fail. I know I am counter-arguing my previous post, but Fitz attacked things as a "grown-ass man", but lacked the physical skills to be great. If Fitz had a bit more arm-strength and accuracy, he'd have been a very good starting QB. On the flip-side if Rob Johnson or JP Losman had that quick-decision making ability, they'd have been great - I don't think either lacked drive or effort.

Because there is no need to reflect reality when you are trying to blindly blast the Bills' decision makers! (Note: sarcasm ON. I don't subscribe to the view that the Bills' front-office is inept, stupid, moronic, etc. I happen to think that the current front-office personnel have significantly upgraded the Bills roster talent. Yes, they have "missed" on Torrell Troup - they should have "known" that he would have back problems and Aaron Williams - while this depends on how he does at S, if they'd have called him a Safety when they drafted him folks might not have been blasting this pick as much...)

I agree with the general premise that a first round pick on any position carries risk of not getting a good player, but I do think that some positions are safer bets than others and QB in particular is more risky because more than other positions success depends on intangible qualities including quick decision making, leadership and poise under pressure. It is easier to correlate physical talent to success at most other positions.

Man, where did I say in my post that the Bills must take Nassib or that I am a big Nassib fan? I am trying to be open minded about all of the QB prospects. I am looking for a glimpse of a reason that any of them might succeed at the NFL level. I specifically said that I didn't think that Nassib was a great prospect (I don't think that any of the QBs this year are). FWIW, I agree that he doesn't have great athleticism (neither do many of the top QBs in the NFL including Brady and both Mannings) and I agree that he is not currently a great deep passer - but I think that he does have the arm to improve there - it isn't like he had the weapons at Syracuse to throw deep a lot. I'll also admit that he needs to put better touch on his short passes, but I think he has a strong enough arm to have a chance to succeed in the NFL. All in all, I think Nassib is among the best of a weak QB crop. I don't know if he is the top guy or not, but he is somewhere in the top 5 IMHO.

Ryan Nassib was 2-1 last year against Geno Smith, Teddy Bridgewater (Louisville) and Matt Barkley. Geno Smith was 0-3 against Syracuse in his career. I know win/loss record doesn't fall solely on the QB, but I think it has to be considered... Note, I am not saying Nassib is the greatest thing since sliced bread, but I think many here under-rate him. I will not be surprised if he is picked in the 1st round or early 2nd.

We are about on the same page, I think. IF they think one of them is a good prospect to be a good NFL starter, I wouldn't mess around with any trade down - I'd just take him at 8. If they don't think so, then a 2nd or 3rd round pick on someone who they think has some possibility of becoming a good NFL starter is fine by me. I just don't want to seen them "force" a pick early on someone who has a lot of negatives. FWIW, I don't have a rational reason beyond him failing to lead his team to more wins and his inability to beat Syracuse, but I don't like Geno Smith. I could be on board with Manuel or Nassib in the first. I just don't see Nassib as the 3rd round prospect that so many here say he is. I see enough arm and a lot of competitiveness. He was also 2-1 this year against Geno Smith, Matt Barkley and Teddy Bridgewater - leading a huge underdog Syracuse team to an upset of highly ranked Louisville.