Rob's House

Kimmel won't be happy until they pass the Unicorn Bill that provides unlimited medical services to all.

This is my favorite fight picture of Alvarez last night. https://goo.gl/images/hjQeXU

Anyone who doesn't vote for TO should be stripped of his voting rights.

This hysteria over the oppressive nature of confederate monuments really undercuts the whole oppressed minority narrative. If this is one of the biggest issues, how bad can the problem really be? This is an excellent read on the topic. http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/iconoclasm-violence-statues/

It's a pretty shwag word that's only used by pretentious ass holes who want to sound esoteric or, ironically, morons who don't know the difference. In any case, it shouldn't detract from the magnificent display of retardation that Apussaholeski and Freddie Jizzstain put on right before Chester derailed the thread.

I once bought a box of Magnums.

This woman is awful. Her voice is grating and she has nothing insightful to say about anything.

I've definitely seen that one a time or two.

If a cop ever has a gun on me with the intent of shooting depending on my actions I'd like him to be as clear and descriptive as possible. And if I ever go through that and my biggest gripe is about his language, please remind me to wipe me kitty.

I wish the wet pu$$ies that support Kaepernick would show even the slightest shred of consistency on the subject. I want to see some prominent white figure go on an openly racist tirade, double down on it, and then watch these ass holes defend him. Not only refrain from demanding he be fired and boycotted, but actively demand that he not be discriminated against. When I see that I may at least be able to respect them for following their principles. Until then then I just see a bunch of race baiters and useful idiots.

I think it's a fair question and coach had a good answer. It's not something to be overly concerned about after one game, but if a trend were to persist it would be a concern. You can't win consistently in the NFL without having your WRs more involved.

It was a head-scratcher at the time. It's the exact opposite of what you give a guy with motivational and maturity issues like Dareus. You give that guy a big heavily incentive laden deal with big guarantees only for injury. If we lost him a lot of the fans would have been pissed but it would still have been the right move. GMs who listen to the fans find themselves sitting with them. Case in point.

He is talented, but Baker is a stupid first name. Pass.

Thank you for pointing this out. I hang my head in shame.

I would just like to personally thank all the brave posters who courageously spoke out against the "Uncle Tom" comment. Sure, it's an innocuous joke that was not intended to denigrate or disparage anyone, but it made reference to racism, and anything that references racism is itself racist. So thank you for showing us how wrong that is and how virtuous you are. Give yourselves a big pat on the back.

This thread is more sad and pathetic than the Bills in the 21st century.

That's not clear. It's more likely he was referring to British mercenaries and impressed soldiers as opposed to the volunteer US army.

That literally made me laugh out loud.

First Jonathan Williams and now this? The tank is in.

Kyle doesn't do it for the money. He does it all for the nookie.

When I saw the thread title I thought it was absurd, but you make an interesting point. If Indy finishes with a top 3 pick I could see them going for the next great QB and unloading Luck for picks to surround him with talent. Not likely, but stranger things have happened.

I don't know if McBeane is in too deep or has the master plan, but I like a lot of what I see. I like that the D-line and O-line are the strengths of the team. I like that we've got a boat load of picks for the next draft. I like that they aren't afraid to trade talent that doesn't fit their image - put differently, that they aren't afraid to gut the team and rebuild in their image. I also like that they have a core group of veteran talent and a group of unproven young guys they see promise in. Looking at this from a management standpoint, it reminds me of running a store when the new manager 86s everyone who isn't on board and brings in a new staff. You go through growing pains, but if the manager knows what he's doing you usually end up with a good team. I didn't like seeing Watkins go, but I'm willing to accept the possibility that they see a bigger picture. And virtually no team rises or falls on the presence of a WR. When CAR went to the SB they had a great TE and that was about it as far as receivers are concerned. If we still suck in 3-4 years then we'll have reason to gripe, but in the meantime I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. It's not like we have a choice. What difference, at this point, does it make?

That's the point. I don't hate Whaley, I just don't love him either. I've just found the love affair a sizeable portion of the fanbase have with him fascinating. And Whaley didn't have many gems on that D. That unit was in place the day he took office.

If an elite talent like Jonathan Williams can't make the team, what chance does an average starting OG have?

https://youtu.be/uEE3ycDH9_8