Rob's House

I think you're right, but it's still a pretty gay way to go about it IMO. They're essentially dissing the country as a whole to get back at Trump. It might make them feel good, but it really trivializes their supposed movement.

They're entirely equivalent from a free speech perspective. One group marched with a permit to protest what they saw as an attack on their racial/ethnic group. The other took a knee during the national anthem to protest what they see as an attack on their racial ethnic group. The primary difference is that one group was met by a group of "counter-protesters" who came to pick a fight. The other group was only countered with angry tweets and boos. Had "counter-protesters" stormed the field in masks with bats and pepper spray it wouldn't be so peaceful. And if the players fought back and one player killed someone I don't think you'd portray it the same way. Edit: And I'm not all that upset about anything other than perverting football with this abject faggotry.

I like that he put it back in the limelight. We now have the absurdity of this "protest" of some vague and undefined injustice on full display and lefties are coming out of the woodwork to remind us that they hate everything about America and the west. Now everytime some unhinged leftist starts demanding someone's head over a non-pc comment we can remind them of their supposed principled support of free speech. Although some in this thread have already admitted that the free speech principle only applies to speech they like.

That's not politics injecting itself into anything. That's a company contracting to do a promotion as a form of paid advertising.

Along those lines, DOJ stats show that black men are 3x more likely than white men to be injured by police. Interestingly enough, black men are 3x more likely to commit violent crime. #hatefacts

And a lot of people have a problem with this so-called "protest", not because of an abstract sense of patriotism, but because it is an attack on the people of this country and western culture generally. They live in the most egalitarian society in the history of the world, one that has bent over backwards to give them equality, often to the detriment of the majority, and they have the audacity to spit in our faces and whine about how racist we are and how oppressed they are. There's a lot to be said for someone who has the courage to stand up for himself in the face of adversity to defend his rights. But there's a clear distinction between that and a pampered brat throwing a temper tantrum over perceived micro-aggressions.

The guaranteed money is what makes it ridiculous. A guy with maturity issues should be given a lot of incentives. Whaley gave him the carrot and the stick.

You're giving him too much credit.

That's not what he said. His point was pretty clear - that lacking ideal arm strength doesn't mean a QB can't be elite. He merely cited Montana as an example of someone who illustrates that point.

It's one thing to make a thoughtful inquiry to determine if there is a problem and if so how severe it is, and try to devise and promote solutions. It's quite another to stage divisive public "protests" for a cause you cannot define or quantify.

Pathetic. It's a strange experience watching the Bills and not caring if they win, but I don't really have it in me to give a **** after that display. Edit: I just saw the full clip and it looked like at least half the team was standing. Kyle Williams was standing proud with his hand on his heart.

The most racist part of all of this are the racist ass holes taking a knee and their racist supporters.

You're using anecdotal evidence to make the case for a nationwide epidemic. Do you see the problem with this?

Check out #23, kneeling but still with his hand over his heart. And look at how the guy next to him is looking at him.

The next intelligent politically oriented post I see from you will be the first. You're a bomb thrower who adds nothing of substance to the discussion. We get it, you're a leftist and everything outside of your opinion is idiotic and/or evil.

As an antifa apologist you lack the moral high ground from which to cast aspersions on others.

Maybe you're not dishonest. Perhaps you simply lack the intellectual capacity to grasp the distinction.

If I were your client I would cease to be.

If your argument requires you to be dishonest it's not a good argument.

If these dipshits did their political advocacy on their own time no one would care. The fact that they bring it into the stadium is the issue. I don't know why that's so hard for people to understand.

The bigger point is that you have categorically declared him to be a racist and done so with great certainty. Your examples are dubious at best. By your own admission these statements SEEM racist based on your interpretation. Yet there's nothing inherently racist about any of them. And that's the entire body of evidence supporting your assertion. There's not much there. And few civil suits brought against the owner of a multi-billion dollar empire is not indicative of anything other than doing business in America. He failed to heed the warning of Lincoln Osiris.

Assuming that's an accurate quote, it's still not really racist. That's a fact. Is this what they mean by "hate fact" ? And your quote is incorrect and your stats don't inform the situation as they don't differentiate between white and hispanic, nor do they isolate stats for the inner city. another misquote, and suggesting that the judge's involvement in hispanic advocacy groups could indicate bias isn't racist. He never said that. So you offered me up your best, had to misquote him to try to make him sound racist, and still couldn't come up with anything. Are there any others or is that it?

You are so last century. A white supremacist is anyone who won't apologize for being white. Or according to Chelsea Handler, anyone who, regardless of race, has a favorable opinion of Trump.

When you hear "Kenya" do you think Islamic terrorists? I think long distance Olympic runners.

That was never the point, but now that you mention it, why is black supremacy less offensive than white supremacy?