BADOLBILZ

Lot's of people? Google is not that hard to use, budda.😉 https://nesn.com/2024/02/could-andy-reid-pass-bill-belichick-in-goat-debate-its-real-possibility/ https://www.arrowheadpride.com/2023/7/6/23785720/chiefs-andy-reid-patriots-bill-belichick-goat I literally said he's been a very good coach, too bad the Bills couldn't have gotten him etc.. I said he shouldn't be the GOAT and you are running with that like I said he wasn't good? You are trying to create a straw man argument for arguments sake. Not very buddist of you.😂

The "you think you're smarter than management" card is the weakest of rebuttals. Any completely uniformed idiot can claim that defense because there is no way of proving or disproving it. It's like a slur.......the intent is simply to shout down the argument without really addressing the problem. Smart people can make bad individual decisions. A lot goes into the decision to acquire/retain or dispose of players and that can make smart management look very stupid.

When a coach is being mentioned as the GOAT after it took him 20 years to win a Super Bowl.........yeah, that's comical. It's a recency bias.

Salud in spanish means health. In the context of death it's used to cheer the health of the living.......not the deceased. Thanks, Fernando. Long live his memory.

Shanahan and McVay. Reid never takes Jimmy G, Purdy or young Goff to a SB. They've combined to reach 4 SB's with those guys. Andy Reid got to one SB in his first 20 seasons as a HC. Fine HC but the hyperbole about his greatness is kinda' comical.

He soiled his reputation significantly when he came back and his heart wasn't in it. But for a 15 year period he was outworking AND outsmarting everyone in the NFL. His teams were snake-bit with injuries year after year otherwise they probably win 5 or so. Parcells was a great HC in his own right but he probably never wins one at all if Gibbs teams have their health.

As far as being an offensive mind.........Reid is a watered down version of Mike Holmgren who was, himself, a lesser version of Bill Walsh. I have always appreciated what Reid does running an organization, he's a very good HC and it was a shame the Bills couldn't have gotten him after Philly fired him. But IMO, as an offensive mind there are those on the high end who could do more with what he's had. And then on the lower end there are guys who I think could take poor personnel and get more out of them. I mean, if I am stuck with a Tyler Thigpen at QB I think I'd take Chan Gailey as my OC over Andy.

#1 for me is Joe Gibbs. He was the Air Coryell Chargers offensive coordinator in the late 1970's and turned Dan Fouts from a dud into an All Pro and then won 3 SB's with 3 different QB's with the Redskins. None of them HOF'ers. He probably could have won a SB with Jay Schroeder too if he could have stayed healthy.

Just do not lose to the RCBP

It's always been a misconception that Reid is some all-time great offensive genius. He won with defense in Philly. He came to KC and initially turned them back around and won with defense and even had a season where his team didn't throw a TD pass to a WR all year. His offense were almost always only as good as the QB and weapons it had. I mean Chip Kelly took over for him and the Eagles got an immediate big system bump offensively. Reid was always a very solid regular season HC with serious game/clock management issues and he just hung around long enough that he had both a Donovan McNabb to help him get to and lose big playoff games(usually at home) and then he finally lucked into a GOAT type in Mahomes.

Pythagorean record is basically a run differential stat. And the 2000 Yankees had a terrible run differential down the stretch. Like -50 in the last week alone.😂 But the 2000 team was running away with the division before they mailed in the last 18 games. When they won their 80th game they had a 7 game lead in the AL East. They had a better record and a better run differential(135 v 118) thru 80 wins despite having played less games. When the 2024 Yankees won their 80th game......they were in second place. They had to play to win until the very last weekend of the season. 2000 had a better lineup and bench, defense, base running, coaching(obviously) and their pitching was a lot better than some of the ERA's indicated. Their season splits weren't nearly as crazy as this 2024 team that couldn't beat LHP and struggled in-division. Like I said........the playoffs have literally fallen in a manner where their weaknesses haven't been able to be exposed. They obliterated the AL Central. At one point they were 15-1 against them and then that's all they saw in the AL playoffs. And the Dodgers basically have one LHP on their staff. 😂 The thing those 2 teams have most in common was that it was a down year for baseball. No 100 win teams. The 2024 Yankees were exceptionally flawed but Judge and Soto carried them to October and(as sometimes happens in October) they've taken advantage of the luck of the draw.

Yeah, you don't really follow MLB if you think the Yankees have outspent everyone else anytime recently. I'm not happy about their thriftiness because the Yankees SHOULD be the highest spending team every year. Because they have the highest revenues and because when you win for 30+ years straight you don't get to tank and rebuild with very high draft choices for many years like the Cubs/Astros/Orioles have taken turns doing in the last 15 year stretch. If you don't want to tank you should be prepared to keep raising payroll. But it's been 5 years since the Yankees had the highest payroll. The Mets and Dodgers have been the highest payroll teams nowadays.

Yes, definitely. On many levels. But just the fact that you countered my all-time team record for blown saves(thanks Clay Holmes) with Mariano Rivera had a "down year" says it all. And there was no question whatsoever about whether that personnel could win a WS because they had just won 3 of the last 4. It's not like these 2024 Yankees coasted to the finish like the 2000 team.......they were tryin' and dyin' for most of the last 4 months of the season.

I think they will likely be focused on a 1 tech DT in round 1 whether they retain Cooper or not. Daquan has become a liability in run defense and Bernard is the key to their defense at this point so they are going to justify it with the need to protect their one playmaker on D. Big Deone Walker seems like a likely target. If they didn't have a first they'd have to get more creative at DT1T which makes more sense than using a high pick on one and maybe ending up with Mazi Smith 2.0. If you know they aren't going to go offense would that change your mind? Garrett's cap numbers would be modest at least because you'd be paying the Browns in draft capital to eat those guarantees. I'm not opposed to paying veteran edge and island difference makers. Ultimately, I'd like to end up with a player like Garrett at DE and DK Metcalf opposite Coleman and Shakir.

Sliced white bread's vast levels of refined-wheat carbs break down so rapidly in the body that they cause intense sugar-spike highs. These make our brain's pleasure centres respond as though they are getting a hit of cocaine. - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition So are you gonna' apologize or not?

Hey don't you have some crack to smoke or a peanut butter and jelly sandwich to make at high speeds or something? I'm just trying to explain why I am always right.

My fair share? It takes a lot of contriving to come up with anything resembling that.😉 It's not that I am wrong nearly as often as the average takester.........I'm not......... it's that the key to being right a lot is not weighing in on every single thing you have a passing notion about. Some just don't know what they are talking about and others just gotta' weigh in on sh!t they haven't really done their homework on. Those people get the bulk of the takes wrong on TSW. Then you have quality takesters who eat up the balance. But the scale is largely weighted to how much one says. I knew exactly who Daboll was so that was a layup. Clever-not-smart people get whole regimes fired in football and can build up toxins in the locker room that take a lot of rosterbation to clean out. Since Walsh and Coryell started transforming the NFL brand of football into more of a passing game there have been enough jokers like Daboll hired as HC's that a seasoned owner like John Mara shouldn't fall for that but he seemed to have lost confidence in his decision making. I suspect he will get back to the Parcells/Coughlin types with his next venture. Maybe BB himself.

By a considerable margin the worst Yankees team to ever reach a WS. For long stretches looked like nobody beside Judge/Soto could hit a lick, have been just awful against any kind of LHP all season, were barely above .500 at home, had a shaky defense, worst base running team in MLB, most blow saves in team history, manager who seemed to instinctively push the wrong buttons on a regular basis, ace who missed a bunch of the season and hasn't been extraordinary etc.. But they got wise last offseason and loaded up on left handed hitting........a proven formula for postseason success........and then the feeble AL Central ended up being their AL playoff competition and now they face a wildly inconsistent Dodgers team that doesn't have much LHP. The myriad of players who played way below expectations in the long regular season(Holmes, Junkarlo, Volpe, Verdugo, Rizzo etc..) are thriving with the subsequently reduced expectations and now they get to be the underdog playing in the WS against the much higher spending Dodgers who have been upset over and over in the playoffs over the last decade(different than the Yankees who were generally just out-talented by better built Houston teams recently). The stars have aligned as well as Hal/Cash/Buffoone could have ever hoped.

I think Beane at least deserves credit for not just taking it when it's for "worse". He loves the trade deadline. It's one thing to not make a move in March but when it's needed in October he's shown a sense of urgency.

We came into this season knowing that they have an overabundance of guys who should be playing slot type roles. I figured they would probably HAVE to use Coleman there some to get him going and that would cost Shakir snaps so they would cannibalize each others snaps a bit and that would hurt Shakir's numbers. I don't have the positional snap data yet but fwiw, Shakir has only played about 58% of the offensive snaps. I think most would have assumed that he was going to be getting Gabe or Diggs type snap counts but nope. Hollins and Coleman have both played more.

How did you compute your $7M figure? Hopkin's remaining base salary would be around $4M at the deadline. It's a complicated contract but I think that's all the acquiring team would take with them and I suspect that remaining base is very negotiable. Cooper is cheap but I think he's a higher trade compensation level and I've never been a big fan of his compete. He's been a bit of a loser's loser. DHop doesn't lack for compete.

Oh man, Mahomes just won a SB taking what the defense gave him and you are calling him a force feeder? Really? When the short armed Shakir adds this downfield contested aspect to his game then maybe he can get those target numbers: https://www.chiefs.com/video/touchdown-patrick-mahomes-strike-hits-rashee-rice-in-stride-for-44-yard-score

C'mon man, you know Beane would do a pick swap. And those are great for the court of public opinion. All Bills fans remember about the Diggs trade is that the Bills got a 2nd rounder.

Yeah I don't buy that they just need a guy to run fast outside and little else like Mims. History(including last season) tells us that Hopkins could fill all of those gaps in the Bills passing game. By week 9 I suspect we will have heat maps that show the Bills can't hit the high and outside stuff and defense's will be serving that up to take away more of what they are currently built for.