Malazan

because they have Adam Gase who's presided over offense in the bottom half of the league for several years or because they have Gregg Williams whose defense have been in the bottom 3rd of the league for the last several years on multiple different teams? Is is their level of talent on the defense that actually seems to be worse than last season? Is it Sam Darnold who had a higher interception rate than Allen? Maybe it's the Jets offensive line that ranked as badly as the Bills line did last season and the only significant addition was a guy who ranked out lower than their existing terrible lineman? ..but this is you so it probably comes down to "They aren't the Bills"

If a civil case is the bar then there's a lot of guys in the hall who now need to be up for discussion whether they belong. The burden of proof for a civil case is not the same thing as a criminal trial. Also, sometimes it's ok to let people be uncomfortable with something so you don't have to apply standards that are unique to one individual to everyone.

You can't ignore the criminal trial because it doesn't get the desired result. Why would give a civil court more weight than a criminal one when generally, it's the other way around? ..but this proves my point...removing him would create an endless debate about a lot of guys in the hall. Where exactly is the line because your view sounds a lot like, "I'll know it when I see it"

If your idea of "better" is very literal in they may have 1-2 more wins. Writing an article like this though, the implication would be a significant improvement.

Sam Young isn't very good, but they need a camp body now.

The problem is then you open a can of worms on debating the virtue of everyone in HOF. A lot of them weren't very good people. Removing him would shine a big light on him and his removal. it would be an endless debate whether so and so should be removed from the Hall. ..and miscarriage of justice that it was, he wasn't convicted. So you'd have that debate of is it a legal conviction or public opinion? Sometimes, it's better to let sleeping dogs lie.

The giants? The Jets? The Bucs? Uhh...

People are really worked up about an automated system detecting a guy hadn't been tested..

Let's also take a moment to appreciate what a terrible idea it is to hire a head coach immediately after he was fired by another team in your own division.

I thought new people couldn't make threads for this very reason...

No, you didn't need to say it. They were obviously being tongue-in-cheek.

How about "Do nothing Carl Paladino wants...ever" instead?

...and they could have had Sammy Watkins for only 16 mill per. The FOOLS!

We know you understand very little....about concussions.

He probably wouldn't have been on the roster by then

and then he got caught in a hurricane like a couple months after that or something. he had an epic run of bad luck.

How many orgasms did you have on seeing this news?

not until the actual games begin

Phil Hansen?

This is the year, I can feel it! I mean, Reid paid him $16 per for a reason(..and Reid has never done dumb things)! Now that he's got a real QB in his 2nd year as the starter (1st season didn't count even though mahomes was setting records), he'll finally have someone who can get him the ball! Now that he has another threat of offense, the defense won't be putting 16 guys all on him!

not to mention, the NFL sent a study out to teams informing them that first ten days of camp are the worst for injuries and to exercise caution.

How did that adjust your level of worry?

It shouldn't. He's a camp body.

No way would I trade dawkins for him...holy bananas batman. He may be better than Dawkins, but add on the new contract, injury history and now 30...I'd hope Dawkins can bounce back or play Ty who filled for williams...