ExWNYer

So there's been a 'T-bone' sighting?

Agreed. My point was that I don't see him falling out of the first round, although stranger things have happened.

Call him? You mean like the last time you said you were going to call me?? Still waiting... Besides, I don't think he'd appreciate you tying up his phone lines while he's fervently trying to get his season tickets for the 2007-2008 Rutgers women's basketball season.

I don't see Green Bay letting him get past the sixteenth spot unless they trade down further into the first round.

Because: A) It's far from a "huge no-brainer" - I'd demand more for Briggs, too, if I were the Bears. B) Your assumption would be dead wrong. C) Your limb just snapped and sent you tumbling down to break your crown: http://mvn.com/nfl-bears/2007/03/29/bears-...er-to-redskins/ http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/10098529 http://www.topix.net/content/trb/002759754...338800023824361 http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/10092141 Dean, I normally appreciate your posts but I don't appreciate you calling me out when you don't have your facts straight. Thanks for playing and I accept your apology in advance.

How exactly would the Bills be able to pull this off when the Deadskins are offering the #6 overall for Briggs and the #31??? I'm definitely down with this...I'd love to see that scenario play out.

I would take a flyer on Domanick Williams for a very small signing bonus and an incentive laden contract. The rest of that list is garbage, IMO.

He's arguably the best receiver available after Calvin Johnson but no way in hell is he worth taking at #12, especially with the Bills having far greater needs to fill than WR.

R.Rich Rich, if you're reading this, I not only deny it but I was taken out of context.

For those old enough to remember: Tom Ruud, Bob Nelson, & Tom Cousineau.

Agree 100%. No way in hell do you take Lynch at #12. If you consider him, slide down and grab an extra first day pick or two. I'd take Peterson in the 12 slot but I'd rather shore up the defense.

I don't want to play the "race card", but I will. Is it possible that your mental midget of a buddy is a racist? There's no way anyone with two good eyes (or one for that matter) and half a brain could say that Curtis is a better receiver. As far as his assinine comment that "Curtis now makes more money than Evans so what does that say?", this just further illustrates what a clueless bag of defecation this assclown is. Evans is still playing under a ROOKIE contract. Curtis just signed a FA contract. If Evans was on the open market he would have a contract that makes KC's look like chump change. My advice: Ignore your "friend". You can't have a debate with someone who refuses to look objectively at the facts.

I believe you're right, this would seem to constitute tampering. But do you actually think they'll do anything about it? No way in hell will anything come of the alleged Wes Welker incident, either. The league would never punish its fellatio partner up in New England.

Actually, I'd even rather see them use the extra 7th on something else and grab a FB immediately after the draft who's an undrafted FA.

I'd sure as hell rather see the Bills draft either Willis or Okoye than Lynch, as many on this board are advocating. Unless you're LaDainian Tomlinson, RBs are a dime a dozen.

I doubt that the American public is ready to elect a lesbian...although they did show a preference for Bush the last two elections.

Was he scalped by that ancient African-American "Indian" who shows up at all the Deadskins games?

I read it, too. When I was a little kid, my dad used to regale me with stories of Cookie's exploits. Dad said GC was unbelievable. I was only a baby during his heyday and the Bills' AFL glory years so I missed out on seeing him. To this day, I wish I could have gotten to watch him play. It's too bad the way things have turned out for him but it's nice to see that he's letting go of his anger.

Isn't it obvious, Dean? "Yasin's BILLS" is obviously the pseudonym of Mike Schopp. I can't believe it never dawned on you. Man, sometimes you can really be a huge dick.

Well, considering TD's current employment status...

Not without a trade down. Next. That's rude. He should have had the common decency to formally address you as "Richard".

Rich, thanks for restoring a sense of order to the board. These are some swell rumors that, if true, might actually benefit the Bills. You always hate to give up our most excellent players but sometimes you have to give to get, right? I am a little surprised that you listed the potential Shaud Williams deal, though...you, better than most, know that the Bills don't have a 5th round pick, but what the heck! Maybe Marv will acquire another to make this happen!! My only other concern is that the Bills might not be able to adhere to their "cash to cap" philosophy. Oh well, who cares?! Finally, some names we've heard of, huh? I hope these pan out. I'm finally excited for the first time this offseason!

I pretty much agree with everything you've pointed out, but I don't think that my original point above can just be dismissed when embracing your theory. I think this is a classic example of the bad outweighing the good in keeping him. Like you said, "confluence of events". Timing is everything.

Droughns? In a word...no.

Interesting and compelling take. The one major flaw with this theory is that Marv Levy was the Head Coach when Jim Kelly came to the Bills. He had first hand knowledge of Kelly and his feelings towards Buffalo. If Levy thought McGahee was a "victim of circumstance" and was poised for a similar breakout ala Jimbo's, don't you think he would have kept Willis around?