Magox

Sooo? What you are saying is that you're a tin foiled conspiracy nut?

Soooo? No proof.

No proof?

Well, then show us the proof, tin foiled conspiracy nut.

Just like we thought, you are a tin foiled conspiracy nut who can't back up anything he says.

Well, then you haven't been paying attention.

So, no proof?

So, no proof?

So you're argument is that since every other president was or is a racist, it's no big deal that he is more transparent about it? Gotcha

In other words, you can't back up your words. Just like the rest of the tinfoil nuts.

No, you haven't. All of you've done is hide behind links and then when asked to point out the part in the link you've provided to make your case, you make excuses, as always. Now show us the proof that the US is purposely funding or supporting Al Qaeda and ISIS to serve as a proxy to defeat or engage against Russia and Assad.

I would really be happy if this happened.

That's because you never provided proof of your statement, tinfoil nut. Until you do, we don't move forward.

Show us the proof that the US is purposely funding ISIS and Al Qaeda via proxy vs. the Russians and Assad. This is your claim, you stated it as fact, now show us, tinfoil nut.

You're a tin foiled conspiracy nut who can't back up a thing he says.

It is subjective which means that there is no clear cut answer. It's not like a math equation where you know that x + z = y And yes, I'm guilty of lumping anyone who disagreed with me as having "Trump blinders". I could have omitted that part, or stated that better, but the overall arching point that I made stands.

He generalizes, he says that Mexico sends people with problems, with drugs, that they are rapists. He doesn't say some people are rapists, he paints a broad brush that encompasses all Mexicans that are sent by Mexico (whatever the hell that means). Then to top it all off, he "assumes" some are good people? That is a racist/bigoted comment. Why? Because when he says "they are not sending you", he is implying that "you" are good, decent people. When he says that the people that Mexico are sending are rapists, he is saying that "you" are better than they are. That is racist. He is saying that "you" are superior to all these Mexicans that are being sent over. The only way anyone can rationally make the argument that it isn't racist is because he isn't talking in this instance about Latino's per se but rather Mexicans which technically is not solely a race based argument. But the point stands. It's an argument of superiority, unless of course you want to decode his words into something other than what he actually said. Ok, but you are decoding his statements in what you believe he meant. If you take his words at face value, which I am because if you look at his entire body of work, it jives with this statement, he implied all Mexicans that are coming illegally. Mind you, I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt that he meant illegal immigrants, which he didn't say.

I'll stick to what I said. But thanks for the tip.

Like I said, it's a subjective term. Just as Justice Potter Stewart once said "It's like porn, you know it when you see it."

I think he'll soon find out if he already hasn't that his brand of politics is not what the Republican party want as their nominee. I believe you are right, he'll go on his own 4 years from now, which most likely won't be a good time go. This was the year to do it.

I'm not a Rand Paul sort of guy, but if he had run as a third-party candidate, he would have ended up getting past the 15% threshold to make the debate stage. In hindsight, he probably regrets not giving it a go.

Well, since the word racist is a subjective term, it doesn't surprise me that many of those voting for Trump don't find his comments to be racist. On the other hand, for most of the general public, they disagree. I happen to be one of them, his comments were from my view, undeniably racist. We've gone over them time and time again and for the life of me, anyone who doesn't believe that lumping in all Mexicans or even if you take him at his word that illegal immigrants from Mexico crossing on over are rapists and drug dealers and he "supposes" some are good people as not being racist, I honestly don't know what to tell you. Other than you got your Trump blinders on. That is a racist comment, there really is no other way to categorize it.

You've got it all wrong Nanker, Romney was also wanting to secretly fund Al Qaeda and ISIS so that we could stop those pesky Russians. Don't you get it? It's not about Romney or B.O, it's all about US multinational corporations!! Duh!!! Those two are just puppets. If the Russians get to Syria's oil first, then companies such as Exxon and Chevron won't be able to profit off of their massive oil reserves that they have which is about .5% of the world's oil. Yeah! .5%!!!! KACHING!!!!!! BABY!!!!!! I mean think about it. Our corporations will get to drill in a country that ranks 68th in the world in oil production. That's a huge prize. And the risk would only be the largest scandal in American history which is that we are funding and allying with a group that caused over 3k deaths in our homeland and another group that is causing mass atrocities in the ME. Plus we get to risk going to actual war with the only country that could deep six many of our major cities. This is a great !@#$ing deal! The risk-benefit analysis is damn solid!!! Hold on, did I imply that Al Qaeda was responsible for 9-11? My bad, that isn't verifiable. That is a mainstream media concoction, we all know it was some other greater nefarious source that probably involved the US and the Saudi's. In any case, Nanker, you got it all wrong.