Magox

He's posted plenty on this site just under different pseudonym's and he's one of the more reasonable posters that frequents the site.

Another lousy week for Trump. Hillary baited him and he fell for it. He spent 5 days punching down to a Pageant winner. Now he's mocking and doing reenactments of Hillary's health, if any one of you think that is smart politics, then you are a dumbass. The taxes issue, meh. But the more important finding was that he lost nearly a Billion dollars in a year? Wow! He's a disaster.

How about now?

Tyrod had his best game of the year, the first half really helped set the tempo and got us to a good commanding lead. Second half they adjusted, but with the game in semi control he was able to help sustain drives and eat clock. Definitely a game to build on, I'm hopeful after what I saw against a good defensive team that we haven't been able to defeat and in their own back yard.

I get the feeling that Ragland is going to be a major stud, I see him starting somewhere in the lineup.

So if we extend Z. Brown, I'm guessing we move Ragland to outside LB?

This whole debacle is one huge slippery slope. Where do you draw the line? Who becomes the arbiter of what is and isn't offensive? Let's be real here, the vast majority of American's for that matter Native American's aren't offended by the name Redskins. This is yet another issue, such as the voter ID deal where the vast majority of people are broadly on one side of the issue and the majority of people opposed to this are either activists, young white liberals or SJW's.

I think I have years of comments here on this board consistently pointing out that Obama is an ideologue who is an incompetent manager of implementing his initiatives. I believe I have made it pretty clear that although I believe he is a true believer in what he does and that from his view he can do no wrong, despite reality pointing to a different conclusion. I do believe he is intelligent, I do believe him to be a fantastic orator and one of the best political athletes we have seen in a long time. I also believe that he was successful in pushing the country in the direction he wanted. For that, hat's off. No easy feat. Having said that, I believe that most of his policy prescriptions are wrong, they are ideologically driven, I believe that he'd rather be discussing issues of social injustice and finds foreign policy to be a pesky secondary issue that he'd prefer punt the problems forward to another administration. And that even though he is racially "inclusive" he is intolerant of those that have opposing views, which from my standpoint fails the test of the kind of person that I want to lead the country.

Did you read what I typed? You think that proves your point that he isn't knowledgeable about foreign affairs?

You are 100% correct in every single point you made. Obama may have the wrong prescription to just about every single ailment we face, but he's at least knowledgeable about most of these matters.

I get what you are saying but that really isn't the point. The point is that he had troubles naming one foreign leader. He's woefully unprepared in the foreign policy arena, it's clear as day that he has no desire to study up on these issues. I'm still going to support him Johnson because he's much better than the other three, but all in all he's another poor candidate.

You would be correct. Let's put it this way, even Krauthammer agrees with Obama.

Much lower

If anything, it certainly would be entertaining.

Not nearly as much as Trump. I'd rather have Obama than Trump, hell, i'd rather have just about anyone over Trump. He is as bad as you get.

Nope, not buying it and I don't give a **** if you don't care that I'm not buying it. I've seen your posts, they aren't just anti Hillary, they are pro Trump and consistently so. Don't be ashamed about it, own it. Go with it! And if I had to vote between Hillary or Trump, I'd rather have Hillary than Trump because A) he literally is a know-nothing B) he's a narcissistic clown C) he is much more liberal than you believe him to be D) you can't trust anything he says E) he's an embarrassment to the country F) I don't trust him with Nukes G) he'd end up being impeached for overreach of power H) he's an authoritarian and would have absolutely no regard for the constitution I) he's a demonizing boob J) he isn't an inclusive person K) he's a racist L) he's a misogynist M) he's a bigot N) he's thin-skinned and would rather talk about himself than the issues at hand I could go on for hours. Thank your lucky stars that my vote won't go to her, because I can't stand her either. Johnson does have no shot at winning, but people like me don't identify with either progressive or the right wing. I practically dislike both equally. I want there to be more choices and I believe that the two party system is broke. So yeah, although Johnson is a poor candidate, in my view he's better than either of the other two.

Thanks for this post, now I know not to take anything you say moving forward seriously. Yes, both parties should be for strengthening border security and orderly legal immigration. The problem is twofold: Progressives don't care about border security and just want to pander to Latino's for votes, and Right wingers don't want to address the issue of all the illegals are here, and to boot they talk down of them as if they are some sort of cockroach infesting and invading their home.

That's because you live in a right wing bubble, you should try getting out more. He care's about winning, the problem is that he is soooooo tremendously thin-skinned, that he cannot let any issue no matter how destructive it may be to him go unanswered without telling the world how Great he is, believe me. Bingo! For a General election candidate, it is so easy to bait him. Just bring up all the dumbass things he has said about private citizens and he will feel compelled to show his narcissistic dumbassery.

Yes, I'm sure you are well-versed within the Latino community of what they generally want out of life. I can find videos of virtually every single group, and find wacko extremists from within the right wing, left wing, African American's, Latino's, White's and what have you. That doesn't mean that's representative of each group. You are a right wing partisan, which means you get your news that helps prop up the right wing argument, which means they cherry pick certain bits of information to feed into their ignorant narrow views. Left wing groups do the same thing. You guys are no different than one another in that you only propagate inaccurate views to help your push your narrow agenda's. So you spare me your bull ****, because I see right through it. Unfortunately for you, you don't even know that you are just one of the many sheep that these disseminators of elephant **** have spoon fed you.

For being a Doc, you are one dim light bulb. It is clear as day to anyone who isn't a raging right wing partisan that Ben is a straight down the middle voter who would be inclined to vote for a R if that candidate showed himself to hold some moderate values. No, it makes YOU sound like the moron. That's not the issue. It's about threading the needle. You can still side on the "Law and Order" argument, while expressing empathy for some of the concerns of the legitimate arguments being made from the other side. You can admonish the trouble making rioters while being sympathetic to the concerns of others. Trump, didn't do that. Yes, illegal invaders.

You have the gall to criticize one dumbass comment from Johnson, yet you are one of the biggest Trump humpers on this board? Really? Really????

The Obama machine and the political athlete that Obama is what did him in. They had their game plan and they executed almost to perfection. The sad part was that they attacked him for something that he really wasn't, which I know had to sting. Politics is a rough rough sport. All I kept thinking about watching that debate was how Hillary baited Trump, all night long.

Your point has merit but it doesn't quite work like that. You may have 95% or some number somewhere thereabouts, who would primarily vote for the D or R depending on their past loyalties, however you have a number of voters who are inclined to support a particular party who won't vote or may vote third party because they aren't energized enough to vote for that particular candidate. Hillary hasn't energized the Obama coalition to pull away from Trump, whereas Trump has energized his base, albeit it is a much smaller swath of potential voters than the Obama coalition, but it appears these folks are going to turnout in high numbers.

Dorkington, You should post another poll after the debate, it would be interesting to see how many of the Republican and Democratic leaning voters have come back "home".