All_Pro_Bills

And that nicely sums up the current attitude of America's political elite running the country into the ground while mooching off the working and middle classes to the max.

Hunter's partner provided sworn statements that the contents were genuine and he also had copies on his PC where he was To/CC on the e-mail. Its real and the payoffs were real. 10% for the "big guy". And the FBI buried the evidence. Another crime. The press buries the story and pretends it doesn't exist in an act of disservice to justice and outright lying. Those 51 former intelligence agency officials that determined it was Russian disinformation lied too. Arrest their asses and throw them in jail too. Lets have the law prevail. So all you posers and preachers demanding enforcement and your unwavering commitment to "THE RULE OF LAW" its time to stand up. Or are you only behind the idea when its convenient to your opinion or aligned with your hatred of the target. Lets see some resolve and commitment to that principal. Are you with me here? Or is it what I expect, just conditional virtue signalling and outrage only when the target is somebody you don't like? That's it, isn't it. So just accept the fact your a virtue signalling hypocrite and go on your way.

You raise a good question. What did Trump get, if anything? I have a good question too. How much did the CCP pay Joe and Hunter in exchange for influence and information? I know where the answer to my question is which is on the laptop the FBI is hiding.

The FBI will leak evidence to the Washington Post that the killer is in reality leader of the local chapter of super secret double-ultra MAGA and all the useful idiots will run with the "threat to democracy" story. While satire its also sadly close to the degraded state of how things operate.

Your seal of disapproval just tells me my opinion is right on target. So thanks for that.

His father was indicted and convicted of 18 counts of tax evasion, witness tampering, and making illegal campaign donations by then US District Attorney Chris Christie. Jared was instrumental in his firing when Christie ran the administrations transition team. It was the first of several major personnel blunders Trump made in bringing inexperienced and unsuitable family members into positions of authority rather than building a professional team around him.

I'm going to have to make do with a heat lamp and a couple garden Gnomes. To augment this less than ominous ambiance, I'm adding some appropriate music soundtrack such as Megadeth's Symphony of Destruction and Judas Priest's Breaking the Law. Maybe close with Hells Bells. That should put the fear of the State into the malcontents.

I pretend to be President of my home. But the peasants aren't buying it. I'm thinking of declaring them extremists.

I don't represent MAGA in any shape or form. So that is no consequence to my view. I only represent myself. I provided my personal opinion on how the "rule of law" is applied in a conditional and inconsistent fashion. I've seen it firsthand in various court and legal situations. I've seen it demonstrated in cases that have been reported and followed in the MSM and online media and in the press. There is no absolute standard in the enforcement and application of the rule of law. The difference in how it is applied is governed by two factors, money and power. If you've got power and/or money the rule of law for you is different than the rule of law is for somebody with no power and/or no money. That's reality. Power and money tilt the scales of justice to a more favorable position. You can say hoax all you want until the end of time. That won't change reality. That won't change my opinion. That won't change the system where power and money matter. It just demonstrates your unwillingness to recognize and acknowledge it.

Generally everyone prefers the rule of law but the reality of how its applied in real-life is filled with grey areas subject to the whims of the people interpreting the law and the identity of the people being charged along with key factors such as circumstances, motive, and intent.

If I may, I think it comes down to what motivates people. My personal theory is that "what" is self-interest. Everybody acts out of pure self-interest. Even people that claim to act out of kindness and altruism are doing it because it makes them "feel" better about themselves. Or perhaps they have some ulterior motive? or some level of compensation tied to what they believe or don't believe. If you examine those self-interests you'll understand the motivation a person has to believe or view things in a particular way. There are a few exceptions to this theory. And as Football season opens tomorrow with the Bills setting off on what we hope is a Championship season I'd like to flag one of them. And one of those exceptions is anyone that officiates or judges any type of sporting event. Football, baseball, soccer, basketball, other sports, on any level. Regardless of what fans think at times, the fact these people manage to remain neutral and disregard their own interests or favorite teams is admirable. I salute you.

I think that's it. In Sept 2019 she said, "I believe he knows he's an illegitimate President". In Nov 2019 she said, "You can run the best campaign, you can even become the nominee, and you can have the election stolen from you". The point being based on the current criteria of not excepting the official results of an election, she's an election denier. Perhaps the person responsible for the creation of the political art form. And the idea that election denying originated in 2020 is, well, a hoax.

I can loan you the $20 if you don't have it.

$20 says Biden is rotting in the ground before Trump is rotting in jail.

Trump took secret and classified documents on Area 51 and the secret US/Alien alliance. Some guy on Twitter said so. 🤡

Fun fact: The most interesting part to the nuclear weapons secret story is this "ally" conducted espionage operations through State intelligence operating on US soil and stole the scientific and technical knowledge from restricted and confidential US facilities and sources to develop their own nuclear weapons. And nobody said boo.

Nobody is going to accuse Trump of being one of the great political orators of all history so that's a pretty weak argument to elevate Biden to A. Lincoln level communication skills. Especially, given his documented record of gaffes and bouts of confusion symptomatic of cognitive degeneration episodes. Episodes which are becoming more frequent. My prediction, he won't make it to the end of his term much less run for a second one.

Making decisions to preemptively intervene based on a million to one worst case extremist scenario is not a smart strategy. Because you can always invoke the comparison at any point and you'd be fighting somebody, somewhere, all the time. Which come to think of it, we are! Sounds like you've stumbled into identifying the basic doctrine of US foreign policy.

All I want to know is the name of the person writing the teleprompter scripts so we can all give credit where credit is due.

I thought Bill did a decent job but he does have a yet to be explained clearly documented relationship with the late Jeffery Epstein. Manifests state Bill was a passenger on Epstein's sex plane several times. Was he just hitching a ride? And the DOJ in their usually conditional application of the law, is sitting on the "Black Book" listing all the "Johns", dates, names, and places along with information on the abused young women. Rumor has it disclosing the list would take down a lot of high profile political and business players. But the silence from the usual demands for justice self-righteous social justice crew is deafening. Seems like they just act up when they're told to act up.

The art of election denial was born in 2016. The idea being it wasn't the voters that denied Hillary the crown. It is to this day some general allegation rather than specific and documented acts of Russians misinformation tied to proof anything influenced voter choice. Hoax. And that had to be the worst insurrection in history. The idea protesters were executing an organized and planned attack to seize the Capitol and ordain their "leader" as winner of the election is absurd. There's no evidence of planning or premeditation. At the end of the day there's no evidence tying individual acts of one kind or another to some grand conspiracy. Some people were arrested for bad behavior. End of story. But an organized attempt at insurrection? That's a political argument, not a criminal or legal one. Hoax.

Keep dreaming. How exactly does a 100-year-old senile and demented President understand and represent the interests of the younger generation? With an agenda guided by the slogan MASS. Make America Suck Supremely. He's doing an amazing job of it as evidenced by his abysmal approval rating which I'm guessing dropped a couple more points after his imitation of 1933 Hitler on 9/1.

OPEC+ agreed to reduce output by 100K bbl/day starting in October. European oil and gas markets react with higher prices as US markets are closed for Labor Day.

Some of our friends hear the dog whistle of "democracy" and immediately imagine some sort of utopia. That must be defended and supported whatever the cost. What they don't comprehend or what they don't want to acknowledge is the Ukranian oligarch system in form and function is much closer to the Russian model than it is the Western model of democracy. Corruption is rampant and embedded into the political and social system. They believe the US government is acting out of a desire to support democracy rather than the primary objective of supporting US policy towards containing Russia. It's a beauty is in the eye of the beholder situation. Most of us see a partner with flaws and faults. They see perfection. If you've ever had a friend in love with a seriously flawed person and tried to convince them of those flaws you know what I mean. They're just not going to see it. Much like many posters can't see the flaws that are Ukraine. And sure, we should help them, but we need to be realistic and see the place for what it is which is far from perfect.