DasNootz

I'd take McClain over Cambell in this situation. Most likely we're going to be drafting mid to early next season too. Why not get the best LB in the draft this year, and hope for better than the 4th best LT in next year's draft? How much success is a rookie LT going to have with on this team in year 1 anyway? He's going to be in the trenches next to a second year player. I'd rather address LT through Free Agency or via a trade (any takers for Marshawn?). Bringing in McClain means giving a rookie a chance to succeed. Paired on the inside with Poz on a 3-4, or moving Poz to the outside on a 4-3, he'll have a chance to become an immediate impact on defense. Sometimes you have to put your best people in your biggest oppurtunities, rather than your biggest problem spots.

Week 16 - I think we're going to be somewhere around a .500 team next year, but will be eliminated from the playoffs prior to the final game.

Prove it... Prove that Sully is 100% right. That's what Sully was asking Nix to do. Prove the figure that you just threw out there. By his own admission, Sully states in his article that nobody has proved that Rivera and the likes DIDN'T turn down their offers for interviews. The same logic would imply that nobody has come out and stated that they DID turn down their offers to interview. Sully has thrown out and unsubstantiated story and asked for somebody to prove him wrong. That's the problem with modern "journalism".

It's probably Wegmans.

You left out a portion.. What I heard was, "There's no such thing as trouble filling an NFL coaching job....even the bad teams... Heck, even Oakland gets calls!"

Buddy just stole the show with his Oakland comment.

Gailey, "Maybe some coaches have personal reasons why they don't want to come to Buffalo... Great, that allows me to be here".

Yes... we can finally start drafting for character.

The girl in the green is hot.

Someone is dropping mad f-bombs... "Is this a f'n rock 'n roll show now?"

I think the reporter closest to us is on the StadiumWall.com right now, looking for updates.

Are you right or left handed? I'd put the underwear in your dominant hand side... because that's what you'll put on first. Socks go in the opposite.

scooby

Didn't Bo Jackson get injurred in the previous round against the Bengals?

I actually saw a mock that had the Bills taking Haden... over Williams, McClain, Campbell, Davis etc http://www.nfldraftdog.com/Mock-Drafts/201...mock-draft.html

Can you throw a football or do you have any coaching experience?

If you didn't enjoy the Hangover... I don't want to be friends with you.

Choosing to be a fan of a team is more sacred than marriage these days. Would you leave your wife if you went through a 10 year cycle with no nookie? If the answer is no, your moral fiber is what keeps you loving... hating... and resenting the Buffalo Bills.

the fake background is annoying me too. If you want people to think that you're actually on the field, film the show on the field level. When Lou Holtz crew is talking, the band members behind them look freakishly large, because they're playing the video on the green screen.

I think he looks smaller today.

How much do you want to bet taht "re-evaluate" is code for "inject with Cortizone".

Did anyone else see Cowher and Nix sitting together? I bet they're scouting our future LB or QB together.

I think Alabama will come out shakey... My bet is they open with a run that gets stuffed, followed by a false start and subsequent sack. Third down will be an incomplete pass followed by a fake punt pass for an interception. Just a hunch.

It probably has to do with firemen. The hook and ladder are popular symbols used in fire department seals, so people got used to the terminology. The brain tries to quickly interpret what it hears, and sometimes we "hear" what sounds familiar rather than what is actually said. "For all intensive purposes" is another one that bugs me... rather than (For all intents and purposes).

McNabb had 4.8 seconds to release the ball to Jackson last night. If any Buffalo QB could have that time, Evans would be a long ball threat again. We didn't take Jackson because he served the same role as Evans, stretching the field, and we lacked a big Red Zone WR.