May Day 10

That is an interesting thought

If you skim the top it looks ridiculous. But if you look at it deeper, its not so bad. The Bills are a huge form of entertainment for me. I follow them, watch games, discuss on internet, follow college (with a small factor looking at Bills prospects), attend games, etc. Without them, thats a huge hole. $1000 as a quasi PSL as an insurance they stay (or I get the $ back) is appealing. Also it should be noted that any owner committed to Buffalo will be leaving considerable money on the table as opposed to a much wealthier, bigger market. It would be a Golisano-type in more of a philanthropic purchase. If this loan can help someone like that save our team, Im all for it.

I agree on the legitimacy/figurehead. Once this gets moving, Im sure we could see various ex Bills at least chatter about it.... I also wont give a dime until I am sure there is no way fraud happens. If I am assured of that, I have a $K set aside. This is huge and something I was hoping would happen. If for nothing else, if they do leave, we can feel like we did something. Also, I think if this was successful and the fans in this smallish city raised 9 figures, it may increase pressure on the league to do what they can to keep the team in Buffalo. Or at the very least (however unlikely), pull a Browns.

My seats, you currently cant see video. Now I will be able to I expect the laughingly low price to be increased, and I really dont mind

This is what needs to be done before it is too late. Cheers to those guys and I will certainly contribute. I didn't read the entire article... what happens if an owner takes the money and later bails?

Can't really complain with that selection.

http://touch.latimes...e/p2p-79109217/

IMO, if a new owner (looks like MLSE/Rogers is getting their ducks in a row) wants Toronto, they are going to get/go for Toronto. There would be no desire/motivation to play any games in Buffalo, nor have any ties, other than a few early ceremonious ones played out for the masses to make it look like we didnt really lose our team. It appears they have a desire to build an NFL stadium, and that isnt going to be for 4 games, 6 games, or 7 games. Buffalo/NYS/Erie will likewise not make significant updates to RWS or build anew for 4 dates/year.

So a new owner would "keep" the team in Buffalo with the condition of assuming Rogers pays upwards of $300 million every 5 years for 4 home games a season? How would RWS be maintained, by whom, and for 4 games a year? And why wouldnt Rogers just buy the team and move them if that were the case? Why spend that much money on a team that isnt their own, and put on that many games for unwilling people (which I am assuming loses money at least under the last deal's terms)?

The Argonauts are notorious for historically getting no fan support (which is why the willingness for MLSE to purchase them should be VERY alarming to us). But with that said, I do not think that, nor the Bills in Toronto series is an indication on how the Toronto _________ will be supported. I would expect a decent amount of support.

sounds like they are really committed to helping the Bills regionalize

I dont know how that worked there, but it was used as the boogeyman that got stadiums up in Minnesota and San Francisco (and probably San Diego and possibly St Louis).

I disagree. The NFL wants to break the plane of the goal line in a foreign country. Toronto brings a ton to the table for the NFL, including possible further immersion into other cultures up there. Likely a secondary TV deal forged up there. Then they can also spin it like "Buffalo still has their team, but its just going to be an hour away and called the Toronto ________" The NFL will continue to use LA as a threat to leverage public money, until that well had dried a bit. Be weary of the threats the NFL doesnt make, and that is Toronto.

Isnt Toronto the 4th largest NFL market without Buffalo? to me, that would be more appealing as a buyer. Move Buffalo out of the way. In order for the team to stay, it is going to have to be a somewhat philanthropic purchase by someone with local ties. If a potential buyer wants Toronto, they are going to move to Toronto.

I think I agree, I think. Look at Ron Rolston and the Sabres. Taking the Sabres' job when he did may have caused irreparable damage to his NHL coaching career. The Browns are a disaster and (the new version) always has been. The Bills arent a great place either, but at least he is a DC with a glut of talent to work with and continue to make a name. His name has been rolled out there in the media through this and he has had some interview practice. I would punt and wait for the 10 jobs that open next year. There has got to be a better situation than Cleveland.

I was under the impression that they would all be done by opening day. I actually do think it is a somewhat big deal and dont blame them for flying that flag. Im in the rockpile with limited view of the video board, so I am thrilled to be able to see replays next year

This picture was taken by me of my television. It was Friday on NBC. I put it on my facebook and a friend asked me if they could put it on their twitter (and they have a good number of followers I think). Same angle of the TV, precise moment. I was watching and Im like "Was that a Trent Edwards jersey?" My wife: "Who?" I rewound it and found that I did in fact see it. She thought I was crazy for snapping a picture, but I thought I was crazy later when I regretted not getting a better one.

Its a lot easier to swallow when you recognize/admit this. It used to drive me crazy early in his career. Like the Rams Superbowl when he had like 140 passing yards and got most of the credit for the win. It looked like he was a good game-manager with a really good gameplan and a SUPER offensive line and opportunistic D and ST. Even when he started putting up numbers, it always seemed like the gameplan would call for a little 4 yard slant and the receiver would gain an extra 30 yards. Then there was the Randy Moss years, when they were the most dominant, but never won the Super Bowl. Statistics show that Brady padded his stats in blowouts like no other. That also P-ed me off. I also think he is the beneficiary of a very large amount of roughing the passer and PI calls. He has the nerve to complain when things dont go his way which grates the nerves. But he has been doing it in all conditions, with all sorts of supporting casts for almost a decade and a half. One injury that cost a season. A lot of it is Belichick and gameplan, but you also need a special QB to run with it and execute. I think that the Pats go downhill pretty steeply when Brady hangs them up. Top 5 of all time I agree with. I would rank Elway and Manning over him no doubt. He is in a category with Favre, Montana, Brady, Marino, Young, Unitas, Staubach, Bradshaw, and maybe Brees. I would say that modern era QBs are much better than the past. If Brady played in the 60s with his knowledge and training, etc, he would probably be considered the Babe Ruth of football. I think that translates right up through Young.

I think it is important for sports leagues to mix it up every now and then (while preserving rivalries). Rivalries in the NFL these days are purely situational, and sometimes geography. Biggest rivalry right now? Seattle/San Francisco. 7 years ago? Indy/New England? Miami games dont do it for me. At all. It doesnt even feel like a Divisional game half the time. (Im no youngster either). Im fairly bored with the AFC East as it is. I would much rather see the Bills in a Division with other Great Lakes teams/rust belt. I would like to see San Francisco/Oakland in the same Division. Philly/Baltimore/Washington/Giants. Miami/Jax/Tampa/Atlanta/NO. Just change it up, I dont know. Its been over 20 years for this current alignment and that is an eternity

for the record, that game didnt cost the team the playoffs. The Pittsburgh flop and taking the field like dogs against Tampa were much worse offenders. The correct answer on that specific game isnt to point to any one play like the fumble(s). But on the same hand, you cant say the game is a coin toss in Buffalo as it was in Toronto and the crowd would put them over the hump. A game in Buffalo is a complete re-roll of the dice. They could get blown out in Buffalo too. Odds of winning in Buffalo are greater than Toronto though. I have already said plenty and dont want to repeat myself on the comeback game. The Sabres also had the most electrifying team in franchise history in the same year and could get more than 13K at any game though. 20 years ago is not transferrable IMO (not to ignore Bengals/Colts/Packers this weekend). I might be the most vocal on here against the Toronto series. I am a season ticket holder though if that helps my voice (and I would pay more for tickets if asked). I am also appalled as an Erie County taxpayer. I have seen this team survive and thrive in the 47 years predating the Toronto series, and it will be fine after it. The future of the team is on the new owner and what their intentions are. I can say pretty strongly that there wont be an owner who will be dissecting the balance sheets trying to weigh a few million vs moving the team. The Bills are what they are. A small market NFL team with charm, history, and pretty darn good fans. If the new owner is a fan and/or has local ties, the team will be purchased with more of a philanthropic intent than an investment. If it is an investor, then the team is gone no matter if they have 1 game, 2 games, or 4 games in Toronto. An NFL team can no doubt make more money in Toronto, Vegas, LA, San Antonio, you name it. Then there is a whole question on behind the scenes, how willing the NFL secretly is in the Bills selling to out of town interests. Also, if this game was a raging success in Toronto. Packing the place with $200 tickets. Wouldnt you surmise that a full-time move to Toronto would make awesome financial sense for the new owner?

I agree. Im not sure if they are better than any of the 6 NFC playoff teams, and possibly Arizona. The AFC is so completely weak, the likes of which we havent seen since the 80s and 90s.

Cant believe its the end of the BCS. Its strange though. Like Herbstreit and Mussburger pointed out... this may be the best slate of BCS we have gotten to date.

I guess it comes down to what you feel is the motivation for this is for both sides and if you feel it is necessary. I feel it just maxes out the earnings for Mr wilson by a few million (which is his right). As a secondary result, They were probably hoping in the beginning it would result in toronto somehow adopting the bills but it's pretty obvious that won't happen. Rogers imo is readying to buy the team and move them to toronto. So much points to that and I cannot come up with any other motivation. they weren't thrilled by the price tag as by all accounts the new deal is less. Then you have wilson. Made double that of a conventional home game. Now a bit less. Are we to believe that a billionaire really cares about that relatively small revenue stream that they can make while they sleep? At the expense of bad press and alienating your fans and even some players? But those who really feel this is about Regionalization and the toronto market is there to be had to root and support the buffalo bills, my points mean nothing. I don't feel the bills are actively orchestrating a move. They are in it for the cash payout. However, I feel like they aren't actively doing much, if anything to solidify the team's long term future in buffalo. Large interests in toronto however seem to be lining everything up to swoop in and take the franchise when they come up for sale. Edit: sorry for any strange phrases: autocorrect

Did you read any of my posts in the thread?

Bills houston nut's arguments: Stevie johnson does drop ball in rws x1000 Strawman Comeback game 20 years ago x1000 I am a sth so everyone who disagrees with me is whiny and entitled. Did I miss anything?