Alphadawg7

No what is silly is coming to a message board and having a melt down about how Beane failed this team because he wasn't prepared to lose FIVE...of our 10 OL by games end. If we lost one more, we couldn't even field a starting 11 without taking a player from another position. If you think just any team in the NFL can casually lose 5 of its 10 OL on the roster and not miss a beat, then I don't know what to tell you. Before injuries, we did fine. With one injury, our offense scored so much that we pulled the offense in the 3rd quarter. Today, starting without our Center cost us this game on its own with the blown snap at the half costing us 3 points. Then we lost 4 more OL, including 2 starters throughout the game. Yet we still dominated the TOP, and should have still won the game if not for a missed FG Bass almost always makes or for the fact our WR decided to get a few more yards instead of going straight to the sideline to make sure we had a chance to kick it...or even just go down so we have more time to set. But here we are, its all Beanes fault for not stacking 20 OL I guess.

So are we going to pretend that Josh didn't have a throwing hand issue on that play? I mean he had to have it worked on after that and needed X-Rays after smashing it the play before.

Every team relies on their Elite QB when they have one

I didnt say they played well...For the last time...like for real the last time...I said BEFORE injuries, the OL was NOT holding this team back. After injuries, the OL is an issue. Not once debated that.

Van Roten is a backup! That’s the point. He is terrible. INJURIES…

No OL is good when playing 3rd stringers. Geezus, how is this a struggle for you?

Weird, considering the offense was pulled in the 3rd for scoring too many points. You’ve got an interesting definition of holding them back.

PREACH ON! 💯

We opened the game down 1 starter and lost 4 more OL from that point on. Of course it sucked

Oh so the OL held the offense back huh? In the game where we pulled our starting offense in the 3rd quarter because we were up so many points. Got it. I don’t disagree with that at all

What are you talking about? We are talking about our OL holding up against an elite DL for Titans. Now you want to change the narrative and talk about the rest of the Titans team as a whole?

Did you watch the Titans today? I did, and they looked like the titans of last year on both sides of the ball.

The OL is more than Roger Saffold.

I mean Josh started the game again 11-11. End of the day, we destroyed the super bowl champs and top seed in the AFC offensively who both field elite DLs. Yes Josh is part of that, but there is no one who can convince me our OL was an “issue” in those 2 games before injuries destroyed the OL today. I mean 5…5 guys were hurt in the OL today between starting and ending this game. And we still almost won.

Love you as a poster…but this take is probably the worst one I’ve seen from you. I think you should have waited to post until tomorrow bud and not while you were still worked up. Just my 2 cents and mean no disrespect.

Geezus your posts are the worst

Im not under estimating anythingS. I said the OL hasn’t held back the offense prior to injuries.

I didn’t say every player on the OL had a pro bowl level day. I said the OL was NOT a hinderance to our offense for 2 weeks against 2 of the best DLs in football where we were the top scoring offense in the NFL until we pulled all our offensive starters in the 3rd quarter and stopped scoring and ended at 2nd in the NFL. Our OL didn’t hurt the offense until we started losing players to injury, and Morse was a big loss today. Van Roten had multiple bad snaps today including one that cost us a FG at end of half that would have been difference in the game.

Huh? You don’t know think they did a good enough job in a game where we pulled our starters in the 3rd quarter? Come on bud. Not saying they were perfect, but they played well enough for our offense to blow them out and against one of the best defensive fronts that had their way with the Raiders today.

We played the 2 of the best DL in football and scored at will and sat our starters in the 3rd quarter against one of them. Our OL didn’t struggle. Are they the best unit, no, but they have been fine until they all got hurt.

OL played fine before injuries first 2 weeks, you don’t even know what you’re talking about. I’m confused how you’re even allowed to start threads anymore.

We started the game down 1 OL, lost a second one early. Injuries were the bigger problem. Then we would lose 3 more before end of game. No one had an issue with the OL play in first 2 weeks against 2 of the bet DLs in football. So yeah, everyone is over reacting to the OL today when we had 5 total get hurt for one game.

You mean having 5 OL hurt. If you don’t pay attention during games, don’t start posting nonsense.

It’s like you didn’t even watch the game. We were down FIVE OL including 3 starters. Lost Knox. DIGGS was hurting. But somehow you only see the defensive injuries? I mean our backup center cost us a FG at half time which would have been the difference In the game. This thread is absurd

Merry Christmas! It’s negative day for you! Bet you’re excited!