murra

Remind me again what the government intervention is with our stock market?

cool.

Eh, it's not a real comparable situation. Anyways, you could argue that Brady's only statistically unbelievable record breaking year was complemented mostly by the addition of Moss and the emergence of Welker. Not to mention a great line. The bottom-line... All these great QB's make their team better. You can't just say comparatively that Manning had better receiving talent. How could you possibly compare that? Stats? No, those receiving yards were thrown by Manning. It's a near impossible argument to make.

That was his point. He seems to have enough time to [insert boring, overused analogy here] because he gets rid of it quick. The only quip I have with the OP though, is how he arrived at his conclusion. The reason Brady gets rid of it so quick is less because of his talent, and more because of the fact that ALL of their routes are intended mismatches. Why is that, and why don't we do that? Because Brady can call audibles. Trent can't. End of story. Either way you look at it, our QB isn't cutting it. BUT teams have been able to win despite that. Our coaches can't. So cut 'em both.

What does that mean? You think you're better than me?

I can remember him fighting for a pass on the road against the jets when JP threw an interception bomb and it was mutually caught, Evans fought off the defender and sprinted into the endzone.

Well there is that... But I'm leaning on the, simon is argumentative by nature but doesn't back up his statements and enjoys ridiculing others because of some bizarre internet dominance he has.

I agree, he often locks on to receivers. Your final argument though, is difficult to prove, haha, but its an interesting theory.

Rather than just using the old cop-out where you call me classless, and tell me to F*** off, can we have a debate. How about you follow the rules of discussion and provide evidence as to why it is insane to blame the QB, rather than just making that statement out like fact. I laid out some very basic examples of why I felt Evans was not to blame. Why can't you at least support the statement bolded above.

Hahaha. Good one.

How is that related? The QB has a plethora of receiving talent. Conversely, the WRs have no QB talent. WR's depend on the QB. QB's depend on the defense/special teams: starting position, offensive line, and receiving talent. Essentially, claiming that Evans' drought is a product of his poor quarterbacking is unrelated to thinking that our quarterbacks are poor DESPITE having a poor supporting cast. It's easy to say, "Hey you're making an excuse for Evans! Why aren't you making one for Edwards". The answer is quite simple. Evans has actually shown to be effective when properly utilized. With a decent quarterback (rookie season), and even as the top receiver (the next season), Evans has shown that he is a legitimate threat. If you want to look at stats, look at how many times he is thrown to. It's a depressing stat. A stat directly resulting from poor quarterbacking. Trent Edwards on the other hand has not shown very much promise. He had a flash at the beginning of last year, but people like you built up excuses for him. Excuses that can't be proven with real stats like times thrown to. In the end its an eye of the beholder thing, and you're very adamant on supporting players based on stats you make up (how many times a player makes a "long throw"? for example).

What are you talking about? YOU'RE BLAMING A WR ON THIS TEAM? WITH THESE QUARTERBACKS? THIS COACH? Dude, wake up. His team sucks. That's not an excuse. That's a fact.

I'm sorry...I usually respect what you have to say, but you need to get rid of your avatar. I've watched 2 Colt McCoy games this season, he looks absolutely overrated. If we get him, expect another 10 years without the playoffs.

2 questions: 1. Where are you getting the money for all of these coaches and top draft picks? 2. You realize this isn't Madden Franchise mode, right?

This was one of the worst called offensive games I've ever seen in my entire life. I'm sorry folks, Van Pelt is overwhelmed. Long before we were down by 14 and inevitably losing the game, we blew all of our chances and field position by not calling plays with enough receivers open, or call running plays that favor our RB talent. This game was an offensive nightmare, and you have to look right at the guy who is responsible, Alex Van Pelt.

Best day as a Bill is like 4 catches for 50 yards...

Ever heard of a blitz? Clearly he belongs a LB. The guys making excuses about inability to cover, and whatnot are guessing. Period.

Why? What do people see in this guy. He's a bum. We clearly have 4 better safeties right now.

our

It's not a stretch. Everyone else was just aware enough about past press conference quotes that they could make a connection. There really isn't anywhere you can make the claim, "making too big a deal" out of it, there is just us knowing something that you don't. Don't worry though, the Bills website has archived all the press conference videos. Looks like you've got some HW to do.

No.

Does it really even matter? Did you have hope for him or something?

Wait so, you actually watch the Pro-Bowl?

Anyone else think that the second this is brought up in court and appealed, it will immediately be deemed unconstitutional?