Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. This is the #1 ranked team? Woof.
  3. It was listed on injury reports as a “foot” and it was aggravated by the crappy field there in Brazil so you were on point there. A bunion is much more serious than it sounds and he probably has one on his other foot. My wife has looked into surgery for hers. It’s a long recovery. 6-12 months to get back to normal from what she was told. I’d think he is probably on the front end of that and he may be right this season. But there’s risk there that he won’t be.
  4. I saw him at Bill’s
  5. Well, we will see starting in a bout a week now... But I think that the sharpness of this offense, the cohesion in areas such as the offensive line, the increased leadership and communication of our QB, the coaching, and the game planning etcetera are why this offense had so few turnovers and other mistakes this past year. It was no fluke, and luck was not the root cause of that, but high level execution was. It was functioning at a very high level because of the players and coaches. It is likely to be similar again this year. They may not have that same historically low number of mistakes, but the offense will be even more dominant regardless. As the same coaches and players who made it a great offense last year, the most efficient in the game, and the offense with the fewest mistakes because of that, are here again next year. And with another year under their belts, it gets even better this year. I think that is the way to look at that stat, but we will both see soon!
  6. Trump lied to MAGA again just like always. This was the plan from the very beginning.
  7. When your grandchildren look at photos of you in that MAGA hat thirty years from now, they won’t see patriotism they’ll see a reminder of the hate and division you chose to stand for. And they’ll wonder how you could ever be proud of that legacy.
  8. no the simplistic take is '2024 points scored=efficient offense' ^y -->2025-'26 or 'high level functioning of many offensive aspects' which is just words. that is the reduction what i am saying is you need to look at 2024points scored*(negative play rate+turnover variance)/yards gained and ask yourself how likely that rate is to be duplicated or even approached in successive seasons...the answer is not very yards and yardage differentials are more predictive than points because they're relatively stable
  9. Just saw him at Ted’s
  10. Manning looked terrible the first half.
  11. When a team has that stat, the best in league history at negative plays, are you saying it is more or less luck, and not a productive of a high level offense, in coaching, talent, and scheme? It seems to me that the would be a hallmark of a great, prepared, know what they are doing extremely well offense--that they make very few mistakes. And I am certain that the vast majority of people saying that the Bills will do that (score like maniacs, break team records again, and maybe league records) again this upcoming season, are not saying it based on that more obscure data point, that most have not even heard of, but instead on the high level functioning of MANY aspects of the offense. You have reduced things to such a simplistic level they make no sense.
  12. Clark was only on the market because of the Parsons trade. Green Bay was not looking to trade a Pro Bowl DT unless it was for a talent like Parsons
  13. It was his bunion that was bothering him. That’s not a joke.
  14. It was the Brazil game wk1 Surface was questionable, hurt his foot or toe or something
  15. Arch has had a piss poor first half
  16. My point is it's unusual to score that many point while gaining the yardage we did last season And that the reason for that was a confluence of best in league history negative play rate from the QB spot on top of the fewest turnovers from a team, ever So the people saying 'oh we'll just do that again!' probably don't realize what they're saying
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...