All Activity

Trump Press Sec Seethes at Journos as Harsh New Poll Shows Him Tanking https://flip.it/JeUkux Damn, trumps poll numbers are taking. I hate to see that!

There is no violence these are peaceful protests. Also, Trump created the violence that isn't happening.

This happened quickly because unlike most people on the far left, Trump and Musk have the ability to get over things and move on.

Good American citizen at work right there.

Great until NbcNews and CNN take one photo of it and then plaster 'MAGA insurrection" on the headlines for two weeks. Actually, never mind. They would probably find an excuse do that anyway.

The average American's taxes, of course. c'mon now...other peoples money.

But what makes you think he still can run a 4.46 after blowing out his ACL and Achilles? (He's also turned 30 in January.) He might be running a 4.56 for all we know.

Homolander/BillSlime, or whatever the fvvck that clowns name is, is beyond help. It even makes enemies of the folks that agree with it on here. Sad indeed. I don’t know what its end goal is with tweet after useless fvvvck tweet that doesn’t mean shyt to anyone. Another sad fact indeed.

The majority. Someone downtown told me...It's illegal to call out the national guard on American soil...Never been done before. Since I ignore this cult propaganda I remained silent. All I could think about .... In 1963, the Alabama National Guard was used to enforce the desegregation of the University of Alabama, a move initiated by President John F. Kennedy. Specifically, the guard was deployed to allow Black students Vivian Malone and James Hood to enroll in classes after then-Governor George Wallace attempted to block their admission. This action followed Kennedy's federalization of the Guard under the Insurrection Act of 1807. Later in the year, Kennedy again used the National Guard to ensure the integration of Tuskegee High School.

...talk about twisted..so it's ok to make memes, threats and videos actually inciting and wishing death on a president but OMFG clutch pearls when he makes a gag video hitting a golf ball at a dumb ass who tripped on his own? LO ***** L @ homeKarenLander....take your meds

I'd rather be American than a trump supporter.

RIP America. We had a good run.

Aww. That's a shame. Wait ....OMFG Isn't that trump with the facist helmet on ????

Right wing populism always leads to rioting because your left policies, unchecked, are inhumane. fixed it for ya

The point about Shakir is the efficiency would continue to fall because he isn't versatile (or you might say 'complete') enough to be used in the range of ways you would need to use him to get him 160 targets. You'd end up trying to force feed the ball to him in situations where he is not best suited to a) get open and b) make the catch and so the likelihood is the efficiency would drop again. The more you get away from using the particular skillset he has and towards trying to use him as a "do it all" receiver the less efficient he will ultimately be. I actually think there is a case to be made that the way to get greater production out of Shakir would be to dial his targets back slightly.... not massively... but about a target per game compared to 2024 and to focus those targets better on optimising his skillset. I don't think the Bills are in the position to do that without having a better situation on the boundary, but I am open to the possibility that Shakir ends up having a 1,000 yard season at some stage on fewer targets than the 100 he had in 2024. You can't exact league discipline on a player based on gut feel about what it was. The NFLPA would have a field day with it.

First of all, no one is arguing for him to get 160 targets (which I just told you as well in the previous post too). Someone said there was “no chance” he could reach “1200-1400 yards” on 60 more targets and mathematically it’s simply not true and that is all that was said. So I don’t know why you want to drag this in all these other directions. And as for the bold, because he’s a good football player. His efficiency in 2023 was an outlier on minimal targets, no one expected that not to drop, I mean of course it did. But it doesn’t drop perpetually either, he’s still a good football player, his efficiency is going to have a floor and to just imply it will forever drop at the same rate is just a ridiculous premise. And when you have 100 targets, you’ve got a pretty reliable sample size to know pretty much what would be expected at that point. Lmao, no I never once projected that, not even close lol. That’s a false premise a certain someone likes to pretend I said by twisting something out of context to pretend I did. That reference was made when I pointed out the difference in efficiency between Shakir and Diggs during Diggs final season. My actual projection for him was around 90-110 targets and 900-1100 yards which is pretty much what he did when he was healthy.

He has been a great draft pick. I don't think too many would argue. Worth $15M? Pay him what he wants? Yeah, no thanks. Not unless he plays a whole lot better this year anyway. Well, yeah, 4.9 is very good for a career average. James hasn't been through a career yet. In career stats, things generally go down very significantly indeed by the end. 6th in yards from scrimmage in 2023? Yup. About 27th in yards from scrimmage in 2024? Yup. Not even in the top 100 in 2002? Yeah. And yeah people mention the OL when they talk about Cook. We've got a damn good OL. They mention the OL when they talk about Allen too. For good reason in both cases. Cook will be here this year, as has been very obvious all along. Next year? Yeah, assuming he's gone, which I do, they'll bring in someone else, in the draft or as an FA, or both. And likely Davis will improve after his very good rookie year. Again, I like him. If he'd sign for around $10 to $11M a year, I'd be very much in favor of bringing him back. Doesn't appear he will, though. Give him, say $11M AAV and he'd be 7th highest in the league, behind Barkley, McCaffrey, Henry, Taylor, Kamara and Jacobs. IMO he does belong behind those guys, with the possible exception of post-injuries McCaffrey. That's about where he belongs, I say. Klos, I don't think many are dismissing it. We're contextualizing it. That's different. And reasonable. Again, two rushing TDs his first year, two his second year and sixteen his third and many are saying he's a 16 a year guy. He's not. He's a 16 in 2024 guy.

That explains a lot.

Sunday Ticket renewal is $420, but they’re letting you pay it $35/month. Also included a snippet about buying individual months of ST, which is new.

I think $10M-$11M/year would put him in the top 7th-8th overall as far as the top RBs are concerned.. I would pay him at that price..

Um, I think many have effectively said this. When you say that we have to get Cook back because he's really good, you're saying that price shouldn't be a factor. My argument here points out what should be obvious but is being ignored by an awful lot of people and posts here that walk around with their fingers in their ears saying "Not listening," when you try to mention price. Many many many posts on here are trying to pretend that this is a yes/no argument, that yes we need to keep him no matter what, period. This proves that there absolutely is a point at which he would not be worth it. Many want to ignore this because it's convenient to their narrative. There is absolutely a point at which we'd be paying too much. And frankly $15M is past that line for most on here, which is why money doesn't get mentioned in many of these posts that say, "Just get him."