Jump to content

Who would be an appropriate.....


Recommended Posts

State official to send to Arafats funeral???  Does who we send represent our stance on pursuing peace in the region?  i cannot wait  for responses on the board....

112761[/snapback]

 

It will probably be Armitage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

State official to send to Arafats funeral???  Does who we send represent our stance on pursuing peace in the region?  i cannot wait  for responses on the board....

112761[/snapback]

 

 

i vote that they send you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

State official to send to Arafats funeral???  Does who we send represent our stance on pursuing peace in the region?  i cannot wait  for responses on the board....

112761[/snapback]

How about Tim McVeigh? Oops, too late.

 

I think Terry Nichols is still available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That may be you impression, but our esteemed leader is not as stupid as we know he is....there will be a ranking official at the funeral of Arafat

112802[/snapback]

 

 

Which would be a mistake. We'd be honoring the life of one of the worst criminals in history. But that's just my informed and enlightened opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Send Al Sharpton...or better yet...Joe Lieberman!

112806[/snapback]

I like the idea of sending Sharpton, maybe we can work out a deal. 12 sticks of incense and a barrel of crude to be named later if they keep him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

State official to send to Arafats funeral???  Does who we send represent our stance on pursuing peace in the region?  i cannot wait  for responses on the board....

112761[/snapback]

 

I'm disgusted we have to send anyone, frankly.

 

But...setting emotion aside, and recognizing the practical matter of representation at the funeral demonstrating a level of recognition of the PA that could help foster peace in the region...Armitage would be a reasonable choice. Dan Kurtzer (US Ambassador to Israel) would send an interesting message to both Israel and the PA. And sending John Danforth would be entertaining for the confusion it would cause. :doh:

 

My preference emotionally, though, would be to send General Michael W. Hagee...because Arafat deserves to be escorted to Hell by a Marine...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm disgusted we have to send anyone, frankly.

 

But...setting emotion aside, and recognizing the practical matter of representation at the funeral demonstrating a level of recognition of the PA that could help foster peace in the region...Armitage would be a reasonable choice.  Dan Kurtzer (US Ambassador to Israel) would send an interesting message to both Israel and the PA.  And sending John Danforth would be entertaining for the confusion it would cause.  :doh:

 

My preference emotionally, though, would be to send General Michael W. Hagee...because Arafat deserves to be escorted to Hell by a Marine...

112837[/snapback]

 

 

Why not send John Kerry? We have no use for HIM here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ask a decent question...get all this stevestojan...try to think about the question separate from you own feelings...use your minds

112831[/snapback]

 

 

are you really the person to wage war on people that throw out a periodic sarcastic post?

 

 

this just in...the house with glass windows just went on the market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm disgusted we have to send anyone, frankly.

 

But...setting emotion aside, and recognizing the practical matter of representation at the funeral demonstrating a level of recognition of the PA that could help foster peace in the region...Armitage would be a reasonable choice.  Dan Kurtzer (US Ambassador to Israel) would send an interesting message to both Israel and the PA.  And sending John Danforth would be entertaining for the confusion it would cause.  :doh:

 

My preference emotionally, though, would be to send General Michael W. Hagee...because Arafat deserves to be escorted to Hell by a Marine...

112837[/snapback]

Thanks DC..that was the type on answer i expected.....i disliked the man too....but there are greater issues still remaining

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So now is the time to give up on any peace process in the Middle East by our administration?

112839[/snapback]

 

The only hope for peace in the Middle East iffor the Palestinians to quit blowing themselves and Israelis up. And no amount of US diplomacy will ever stop that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

State official to send to Arafats funeral???  Does who we send represent our stance on pursuing peace in the region?  i cannot wait  for responses on the board....

112761[/snapback]

Bush went out of his way to avoid shaking his hand and a couple of years ago publically called for his removal from leadership of the Palestinian Authority. I'd be surprised if he sent anyone, unless it was more in the interest of reaching out to Arafat's successors than actually paying respects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jimmy Carter

112850[/snapback]

 

I'd like to send a whiskey 87, but that's not the right answer. Carter might not be a bad choice. Now is not the time to further allienate the Palestinian people. Need to make some kind of positive gesture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to send a whiskey 87, but that's not the right answer. Carter might not be a bad choice. Now is not the time to further allienate the Palestinian people. Need to make some kind of positive gesture.

112857[/snapback]

 

I'm not sure about Carter. On the one hand, he established the Camp David accords. On the other hand...he established the Camp David accords. I mean...even though brokering peace between Israel and Egypt was an excellent legacy for his presidency, isn't it possible that the Palestinians may take umbrage at the gesture for feeling abandon by Egypt, and therefore find Carter's presence more of an insult than anything else?

 

Just spitballing there...I could be wrong...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard on the radio this AM that they're sending a staffer from State below Armitage, who's dealt with Mid East politics. Forget the name. Even that is too high of a person to send to a murderer's funeral.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My condolences GG :doh:  :blink:

112880[/snapback]

 

Hell, nothing is going to give me a downer today. It's Vets Day, and a grave cancer has finally been eradicated from this world.

 

Time to double up on the Nyquils.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

State official to send to Arafats funeral???  Does who we send represent our stance on pursuing peace in the region?  i cannot wait  for responses on the board....

112761[/snapback]

That is an excellent question and one I am sure has been the subject of some teeth gnashing at the White House and State Department.

 

I think we should send whoever it is besides the Prez and the Veep that would send the strongest message that we take the Palestinian claim to a homeland very seriously. We do not need to convince Israel of our sincerity, objectivity nor the depth of our committment to their security. We do have a long way to go to convince Palestinians and other Arabs that they can trust us as a mediator not to sell them out or just parrott whatever positioin Israel would like us to take. This decision has to be made with the future in mind and not based on whether we think Arafat was the worst criminal of the last 40 years or a nationalist patriot or something inbetween.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is an excellent question and one I am sure has been the subject of some teeth gnashing at the White House and State Department.

 

I think we should send whoever it is besides the Prez and the Veep that would send the strongest message that we take the Palestinian claim to a homeland very seriously.  We do not need to convince Israel of our sincerity, objectivity nor the depth of our committment to their security.  We do have a long way to go to convince Palestinians and other Arabs that they can trust us as a mediator not to sell them out or just parrott whatever positioin Israel would like us to take.  This decision has to be made with the future in mind and not based on whether we think Arafat was the worst criminal of the last 40 years or a nationalist patriot or something inbetween.

112920[/snapback]

 

I beg to differ. You show exactly what you thought of Arafat by sending in Travis Henry. But in your first meeting with Abbas next week, you send Powell. That's the message.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...