Jump to content

Apparently the FO screwed up trading Dockery


coastalpika

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 154
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Why is it that teams like the Pats always seem to make good trades and get extra draft picks?

DD had trade value, but it takes a smart FO to make it happen. NE has a billion dollars tied up

in their 2 QBs, but wait and see what type of mother load they will pull in for Cassel. I hate to

say it, but I just don't see this team overtaking anybody in our division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it that teams like the Pats always seem to make good trades and get extra draft picks?

DD had trade value, but it takes a smart FO to make it happen. NE has a billion dollars tied up

in their 2 QBs, but wait and see what type of mother load they will pull in for Cassel. I hate to

say it, but I just don't see this team overtaking anybody in our division.

 

 

He only had trade value, if he was willing to redo his contract. Why would he redo his contract to go to a team like Detroit, when he could negotiate with any team in FA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He only had trade value, if he was willing to redo his contract. Why would he redo his contract to go to a team like Detroit, when he could negotiate with any team in FA?

 

Probably true. But with his upfront money already on Buffalo's books, doesn't it seem as if the guy had trade value?

With the kind of money being thrown around this year, his existing contract probably could be handled by plenty

of teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably true. But with his upfront money already on Buffalo's books, doesn't it seem as if the guy had trade value?

With the kind of money being thrown around this year, his existing contract probably could be handled by plenty

of teams.

Dockery still had $28M left on his deal with the Bills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think something is getting lost in translation here. The entire article seems poorly edited. From near the end: "The other strange part of the experience is that Dockery didn't lose much money by being released by the Bills, In fact, he had some financial gains. The Bills paid him $18.5 million during his first two years in Buffalo. Those first two years very pretty much guaranteed." What does that even mean? If you've already been paid money by definition I'd say it's guaranteed. And as others have pointed out, the only deadline the Bills could've been facing was a self-imposed one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not buying what John "Gollum" Clayton is selling. I call bull sh--. Maybe the Bills were exploring trades -- but beyond the Lions -- I'm not sure who would have wanted an underachieving Dockery. The whole deadline thing adds another level of dis-believability.

 

While it would have been nice to get a draft pick -- TBD was hailing Brandon for getting rid of dead weight less than 24 hours ago. This article doesn't hold water in my opinion and shouldn't be enough to jump off the bandwagon just yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The trade would never have happened anyway. Even if the Bills got the paperwork in on time, Dockery's agent would have called the Redskins anyway and gotten Dockery to refuse to report.

 

 

What paperwork?...and on time for what? What deadline was missed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What paperwork?...and on time for what? What deadline was missed?

Who knows.

 

But, a team does have to send paperwork to the league for a trade so the league can determine if everything is cap kosher and so on. If the papers get faxed to a porn number of something, then the trade never happened.

 

In fact, it wouldn't surprise me if they had both the waiver forms and the trade forms sitting on the desk and faxed the wrong ones between mouthfuls of a ham sandwich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...