Kelly the Dog Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 I was taken aback by the #1 as everyone. Hated it. I dig McCargo, however, and didnt thnk he would be available in #2. IF we get a good prospect as an OL in round three, this really could turn out to be a good draft. Regardless, no one knows and won't know for 2-4 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffaloboyinATL Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 I was taken aback by the #1 as everyone. Hated it. I dig McCargo, however, and didnt thnk he would be available in #2. IF we get a good prospect as an OL in round three, this really could turn out to be a good draft. Regardless, no one knows and won't know for 2-4 years. 675478[/snapback] I agree. I hope there is a decent OT waiting for us in the 3rd. So far we drafted 2 positions of need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 i was more surprised than dissappointed with the first pick, like the second. i think right now its a fair-good draft, depending on the 3rd., Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayFinkle Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 I agree. I hope there is a decent OT waiting for us in the 3rd. So far we drafted 2 positions of need. 675609[/snapback] The point of it is that we have a lot of needs. Giving up a 3rd in a deep draft to move up 15 spots for a guy that might have lasted until the 3rd is brutal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 id just like to point out that everyone's major gripe with TD was that he always drafted the flashy pick and never addressed (boring) needs. now we're seriously addressing needs and everyone is ready to jump off the roof... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackAndre Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 I was upset originally, but I think we need to trust Marv. He seems to have a plan while TD just drafted the best player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slothrop Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 uhhhhh - we traded our third round pick for one of the worst trade bluders in recent memory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EndZoneCrew Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 uhhhhh - we traded our third round pick for one of the worst trade bluders in recent memory. 675661[/snapback] who is that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 I agree. I hope there is a decent OT waiting for us in the 3rd. So far we drafted 2 positions of need. 675609[/snapback] Maybe Winston Justice will still be on the board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlk.billsfan Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 The point of it is that we have a lot of needs. Giving up a 3rd in a deep draft to move up 15 spots for a guy that might have lasted until the 3rd is brutal. 675627[/snapback] Unlikely to last to us in the third I wouldn't call it "brutal" I like the fact that we are willing to go by our convictions and not the concensus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slothrop Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 we traded our second and third round pick for the McCargo pick, who would have been there with our second round pick. This draft is terrible! The players may turn out to be good - but our draft strategy is awfull. So now we get two players in the first day of the draft when we should have traded down to pick up an extra pick to exit day one with four players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosmicBills Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 Who's the big OL from Pitt? Will he slide to the Bills in the third?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slothrop Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 Unlikely to last to us in the thirdI wouldn't call it "brutal" I like the fact that we are willing to go by our convictions and not the concensus 675688[/snapback] WE DO NOT HAVE A THIRD ROUND PICK!!!!!!!! PAY ATTENTION! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astrobot Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 By my calculations, we'll have 3 players, 2 defense and 1 offense (probably), by the end of Day 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zac Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 we traded our second and third round pick for the McCargo pick, who would have been there with our second round pick. This draft is terrible! The players may turn out to be good - but our draft strategy is awfull. So now we get two players in the first day of the draft when we should have traded down to pick up an extra pick to exit day one with four players. 675691[/snapback] How do you know he would have been there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 WE DO NOT HAVE A THIRD ROUND PICK!!!!!!!! PAY ATTENTION! 675697[/snapback] We had two. We traded one. That leaves one. Settle down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iommi Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 we have the 70th pick in the third, from tenn. for henry trade.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 we have the 70th pick in the third, from tenn. for henry trade.... 675723[/snapback] 35 more picks till then, maybe the Deuce will slide! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADOLBILZ Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 I agree. I hope there is a decent OT waiting for us in the 3rd. So far we drafted 2 positions of need. 675609[/snapback] 2 down, 10 to go. When do we start drafting the difference makers? Next year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeSpeed Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 The Bills are buying Cadillacs (Good Players) but paying Ferrari money for them. Come on people, the draft is all about value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.529869a0a9afd197241cad0932282c97.jpg)
Recommended Posts