GolfandBills Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago Get ready for slop fest field Sunday. This past weekend was 6 high school games. Pitt vs Miami Saturday. It’s been rainy down here the last couple days and that field is usually a disaster. Quote
Scott7975 Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago I don't know if he will help us or not but this guy is absolutely a professional. "Can't pass up the opportunity to play with Josh." Love that. 1 Quote
GolfandBills Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 5 hours ago, SCBills said: Yea…. That’s too far. Beyond trash talk. Well the way she runs her mouth it doesn’t bother me. Can’t stand either one of them Quote
Jukester Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 8 minutes ago, GolfandBills said: Get ready for slop fest field Sunday. This past weekend was 6 high school games. Pitt vs Miami Saturday. It’s been rainy down here the last couple days and that field is usually a disaster. They just replaced the full field sod a month ago so that’s pretty sad. Quote
No_Matter_What Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 10 hours ago, Scott7975 said: I don’t think they actually need to run the table to make the playoffs but it’s close and this Pitts game is one of those musts imo. division is out of reach imo. Even running the table, I don’t see the Pats dropping what will likely be needing to be 4 games, not 3 that some are suggesting. We are 3 games behind but tying them doesn’t give us the division. They currently hold other tie breakers such common games. as for needing to dump Brady, that’s not needed but Brady needs to come with a new scheme of plays. We also need Kincaid back. That is Josh safety blanket. The offense is night and day with him out vs in. If they get rid of Brady then end of season is better at this point. You are wrong on both bolded statements. Second one is factually wrong, if we run the table and Pats lose 3 games we are 13-4 and they are 12-5. Tiebreakers won't matter. First one is also wrong depending on definition of "close" NYT says that we can lose any 2 games and have 99%+ chance to get in, so there is room for 2 errors. Even if we go 3-3 we have 60-70% to get in depending on which games we lose. Quote
Scott7975 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 4 hours ago, No_Matter_What said: You are wrong on both bolded statements. Second one is factually wrong, if we run the table and Pats lose 3 games we are 13-4 and they are 12-5. Tiebreakers won't matter. First one is also wrong depending on definition of "close" NYT says that we can lose any 2 games and have 99%+ chance to get in, so there is room for 2 errors. Even if we go 3-3 we have 60-70% to get in depending on which games we lose. On the first one, yeah you are right. Its so late in the season that I keep forgetting they haven't had a bye yet and I looked at the win column but not the loss column. Thats my bad. Second one, Im not going to give you. IDGAF if some simulator says we can lose any 2 games and still have 99% chance to get in. We aren't even 99% chance now. Losing to Pitts gives them a tie breaker. Just this week alone, if we lost to Pitts and the Texans win, we would be pushed to 9th in the playoff picture. Yeah yeah, teams play other teams this and that, but overcoming 2 places in the race isnt easy to do in 5 games. Much less if we lost another one. They'd be relying on specific losses from other teams. No f'in way that puts us 99% chance to get in. Edited 2 hours ago by Scott7975 2 Quote
FLFan Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 7 hours ago, Scott7975 said: I don't know if he will help us or not but this guy is absolutely a professional. "Can't pass up the opportunity to play with Josh." Love that. I can’t wait for Brady to run him deep as a decoy on the first series and then never use him again. 3 Quote
loveorhatembillsfan4life Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) Did I hear right that McDermott is “glad to be in the hunt”? Is that the banner we hang in the field house these days? Edited 1 hour ago by loveorhatembillsfan4life Quote
FLFan Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 13 hours ago, JerseyBills said: Thoughts? 🤣🤣 BTW, 17 has a muchhhhhhhhh more attractive wife and should have multiple SBs I agree. Brittany is a skank. 1 Quote
Psautcsk Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 10 minutes ago, loveorhatembillsfan4life said: Did I hear right that McDermott is “glad to be in the hunt”? Is that the banner we hang in the field house these days? Goes right along with his "I love these guys" when asked if he had a championship roster. Read between the croutons in the word salad. Quote
Big Turk Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 32 minutes ago, loveorhatembillsfan4life said: Did I hear right that McDermott is “glad to be in the hunt”? Is that the banner we hang in the field house these days? "It's hard to win in this league." 1 Quote
MikePJ76 Posted 54 minutes ago Posted 54 minutes ago 13 hours ago, JerseyBills said: Thoughts? 🤣🤣 BTW, 17 has a muchhhhhhhhh more attractive wife and should have multiple SBs Is this real? Did he really do that? what is wrong with your brain to do something like that. Quote
Psautcsk Posted 53 minutes ago Posted 53 minutes ago 22 minutes ago, Big Turk said: "It's hard to win in this league." Next year it will be replaced with "In this league, it's hard to win" Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.