Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


 

 

 

Ive been saying this!!!!

I mean, honestly he was morally better than MLk Jr.... 

Posted
4 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said:

 

Probably just stop trying to justify shooting someone in the neck in front of their family.   


Where in my post or the tweet did I do that? 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


 

 

 

Ive been saying this!!!!

 

He wasn't forcing it down our throats.  I mean come on.

 

He gave the people who disagreed with him a microphone and an audience of billions.  

He didn't force the microphone, he didn't trap them there.  How in the world is that forcing it down our throats?

 

Do you know how social media works?  If you stop watching a certain person/platform, you don't get that platform anymore.  They feed you what you want based on your history.  So if you don't want to listen to Kirk, you don't have to.

 

Do you know what actually forcing it down our throats?  Having transgender and cross dressers come into schools and giving them their ideology.

The kids have NO choice, they have to participate.  
Or transgender men that want to use girls bathrooms. 

Or changing the words and language to our National Anthem.

Or having cross dressers on PBS and Sesame Street.

Or having pro-liberal messages on athletes uniforms.

Or having tax dollars go to programs such as "Teenage Male Pregnancy Studies".

That's forcing it down our throats.

 

Posted
17 minutes ago, ScotSHO said:

Maybe post a video so we can decide for ourselves?  The goofy video titles look ominous and violent - humiliates, wrecks, demolishes, destroys.  But I'm guessing the actual discussions within said videos are not what the titles suggest.

 

No they’re pretty spot on 

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
38 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

 

No they’re pretty spot on 

 

 

 

 

Definitely not a saint, but I did laugh. 

 

But I think the videos referenced were those campus discussion events where someone from the crowd comes up.  He's generally decent to the people, but also has a strong opinion so I can see the interaction coming off as "evil" and "violent".

Edited by ScotSHO
  • Dislike 1
Posted
5 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

What got you banned, and was it from PPP or the other parts of the board? 

I can confirm your failings in this area.  I, on the other hand am completely consistent except when I am not, usually with good reason.  
 

 

I thought I was on PPP but apparently one of the Kirk threads was on off the wall 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

I thought I was on PPP but apparently one of the Kirk threads was on off the wall 

I saw that thread—-turns you were surfing in shark-infested waters wearing a bathing suit made of seal meat! 

Posted
1 hour ago, Roundybout said:


Where in my post or the tweet did I do that? 

You posted a tweet of a murder victim stating he spread garbage viral slop.   Including a statement on his character.   Not explicitly saying the murder is justified isnt needed in this instance.  You do this sort of thing quite a lot.   Its cowardice.  

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
5 hours ago, ScotSHO said:

 

Definitely not a saint, but I did laugh. 

 

But I think the videos referenced were those campus discussion events where someone from the crowd comes up.  He's generally decent to the people, but also has a strong opinion so I can see the interaction coming off as "evil" and "violent".

Having a strong opinion and sticking to your guns is not close to evil or violent though 

 

That's called sticking to your beliefs 

 

Now if he ran around calling gay people **** and freaks... And talking s*** about black people... And didn't allow discussion while calling the entire left commie liberals that would be a different story..  that would show hate

 

But he literally helped black businessmen... He didn't hate you if you were a tranny... he could agree to disagree that doesn't mean hate

 

And he gave everybody an open platform 

 

Something that the left said they wished more on the right would do.. have open political discussion 

 

And he was still assassinated

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
4 hours ago, thenorthremembers said:

You posted a tweet of a murder victim stating he spread garbage viral slop.   Including a statement on his character.   Not explicitly saying the murder is justified isnt needed in this instance.  You do this sort of thing quite a lot.   Its cowardice.  


He did. It was all clickbait nonsense, with cherry-picked segments from his “debates.” 
 

Kirk’s technique was mocked for years. It’s nothing new. 

Posted
52 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


 

Kirk’s technique was mocked for years. It’s nothing new. 
 


More cowardice. 
 

Untrue blanket statement not backed by any evidence or link. 
 

It’s nothing new. 
 

 

 

 

 

 

.

Posted
12 hours ago, Westside said:

No , it definitely sounds like a leftist extremist. You live in a make believe world. Words have meaning. Wishing a whole group of people dead just because they have a difference in their political beliefs is terrorism. Stop defending those cretins on the left who wish for and celebrate the death of an innocent man! Disgusting behavior on your part! 

 
I live in a make believe world? And how do you come to that conclusion?

 

See that’s the problem with the majority of people. You believe your perspective, thought process or belief is the absolute accuracy. 
 

Words certainly have meaning. There was never a dispute of that. And in essence, your brash and hard headedness proves what I initially said; things are automatically labeled one way because the other side said so, something you can’t distinguish as A or B unless intrinsically stated or announced by the quoted party. 
 

If believing that statement was something someone with serious issues, where something someone from both sides could say such an outlandish statement… then I’ll happily stay in my “make believe world”. 
 

You’re gerrymandering the divide. Congratulations. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

By whom? The likes of you? That would make perfect sense. 


His “debate” (a word I use loosely) style was widely mocked. Memes like that were everywhere 

Posted
Just now, Roundybout said:


His “debate” (a word I use loosely) style was widely mocked. Memes like that were everywhere 

That pretty much negates the show of affection/hurt for the departed that has been seen in countries all around the world. The memes. 
 

If you die of carbon monoxide poisoning at one of your houses tonight, how many will mourn you?

Posted
2 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

That pretty much negates the show of affection/hurt for the departed that has been seen in countries all around the world. The memes. 
 

If you die of carbon monoxide poisoning at one of your houses tonight, how many will mourn you?

 

If people truly mourned him, the MAGA administration wouldn't be going to draconian measures to make sure dissent was smashed. 

 

It's indefensible. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Roundybout said:

 

If people truly mourned him, the MAGA administration wouldn't be going to draconian measures to make sure dissent was smashed. 

 

It's indefensible. 

Non sequitur 

×
×
  • Create New...