BringMetheHeadofLeonLett Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 33 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Yep. It was years away last week. Didn’t even have the capability. Today they were literally days away. For the sake of the most simple math possible, let's say 'years away' equals 2 years, and 'only set back a few months' equals 3 months... Let me get that second brain cell fired up here... that would mean we're now talking about nuke capability in 2 years and 3 months. According to your quotes, where exactly did the 2 years become zero years?
Mikie2times Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 minute ago, JDHillFan said: Pretty sure the cleanup from multiple 30k lb bombs is going to take a while. This is laughable. Thank you for offering never to post again if you are wrong. Make sure you get it all out now. You think the they didn't remove the uranium with the time they had? That's just one path. Watching the selective paranoia and conspiracy theories of you guys is incredibly fascinating. Trump says, DESTROYED. Then all of you follow, DESTROYED, no chance! Everything else has to be fake news. Meanwhile you will question why somebody scratched themselves so long as an inbred on X posts about it.
Wacka Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 18 minutes ago, TH3 said: You can't bomb knowledge - They know how to do it. Why would they ever use a nuke - it would be suicide 72 virgins 1
Big Blitz Posted 9 hours ago Author Posted 9 hours ago 1 minute ago, BringMetheHeadofLeonLett said: For the sake of the most simple math possible, let's say 'years away' equals 2 years, and 'only set back a few months' equals 3 months... Let me get that second brain cell fired up here... that would mean we're now talking about nuke capability in 2 years and 3 months. According to your quotes, where exactly did the 2 years become zero years? What are they closer to? How close were they to it?
JDHillFan Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 minute ago, Mikie2times said: You think the they didn't remove the uranium with the time they had? That's just one path. Watching the selective paranoia and conspiracy theories of you guys is incredibly fascinating. Trump says, DESTROYED. Then all of you follow, DESTROYED, no chance! Everything else has to be fake news. Meanwhile you will question why somebody scratched themselves so long as an inbred on X posts about it. They may have. You think a country repeatedly compromised by Israeli intelligence was able to do that undetected? I don’t know that it’s been DESTROYED. I do know that the guarantee you made a couple posts above is complete horsesh*t. You are desperate to believe that this has all gone to Trump’s detriment and are willing to declare you may be proven right within days. The fact is that you don’t know sh*t and are really just posting based on your Trump-centric emotions. It’s embarrassing. I really don’t care how it impacts Trump. You do. Bigly. 2
BringMetheHeadofLeonLett Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Just now, Big Blitz said: What are they closer to? How close were they to it? Nobody claims they are 'closer to' anything as a result of our B-2 Earth-movers being called into action. Your argument is based on an intentionally false misunderstanding of our language and basic math. I'd be embarrassed to repost that garbage logic, but you do you.
Big Blitz Posted 8 hours ago Author Posted 8 hours ago 2 minutes ago, BringMetheHeadofLeonLett said: Nobody claims they are 'closer to' anything as a result of our B-2 Earth-movers being called into action. Your argument is based on an intentionally false misunderstanding of our language and basic math. I'd be embarrassed to repost that garbage logic, but you do you. If that bombing set them back just a few months then they were close to getting a nuke. They were “years” away. But that strike only set them back a few months. My interpretation of the fake source is we did NO significant damage. That’s my logic. You go ahead and believe that.
Mikie2times Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago (edited) 10 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: They may have. You think a country repeatedly compromised by Israeli intelligence was able to do that undetected? I don’t know that it’s been DESTROYED. I do know that the guarantee you made a couple posts above is complete horsesh*t. You are desperate to believe that this has all gone to Trump’s detriment and are willing to declare you may be proven right within days. The fact is that you don’t know sh*t and are really just posting based on your Trump-centric emotions. It’s embarrassing. I really don’t care how it impacts Trump. You do. Bigly. You're posting on your world knowledge and I'm posting on my Trump-centric emotions? When people disagree with Trump they have TDS and when you guys post whatever non stop thread about liberals you do so rationally without the seeming obsession you have? Trump is not an honest person, I expect dishonest people to do dishonest things, betting on dishonest people doing dishonest things is not hard. Edited 8 hours ago by Mikie2times 1
Big Blitz Posted 8 hours ago Author Posted 8 hours ago Especially when the damage to the other one only set you back a few months.
BringMetheHeadofLeonLett Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 20 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: If that bombing set them back just a few months then they were close to getting a nuke. They were “years” away. But that strike only set them back a few months. My interpretation of the fake source is we did NO significant damage. That’s my logic. You go ahead and believe that. If a project is expected to be done in 5 years, but has a 1 year setback, it would then be expected to take 6 years. Stop me if I'm going too fast here. Believe and post whatever misinterpretations and misguided outrage you like- not my problem.
JDHillFan Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 18 minutes ago, Mikie2times said: You're posting on your world knowledge and I'm posting on my Trump-centric emotions? When people disagree with Trump they have TDS and when you guys post whatever non stop thread about liberals you do so rationally without the seeming obsession you have? Trump is not an honest person, I expect dishonest people to do dishonest things, betting on dishonest people doing dishonest things is not hard. Can you point to the “world knowledge” part so that I can follow along? Do you think the Iranians were shrewd enough to outsmart Israeli intelligence with the alleged move of nuclear materials? You made an idiotic “guarantee” based on nothing but emotion. One you believe may be proven right “within days”. Laughable.
Big Blitz Posted 8 hours ago Author Posted 8 hours ago 5 minutes ago, BringMetheHeadofLeonLett said: If a project is expected to be done in 5 years, but has a 1 year setback, it would then be expected to take 6 years. Stop me if I'm going too fast here. Believe and post whatever misinterpretations and misguided outrage you like- not my problem. Of course that’s a possibility. But the whole “this is going to be 300 feet underground” thing kinda makes you wonder what its intentions are. They were at 60 percent enrichment. That’s weeks away. That is fact. Saying they were set back only months - use your logic.
CoudyBills Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 20 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Especially when the damage to the other one only set you back a few months. That guy and that site would be hit if that were true.
Mikie2times Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 3 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Can you point to the “world knowledge” part so that I can follow along? Do you think the Iranians were shrewd enough to outsmart Israeli intelligence with the alleged move of nuclear materials? You made an idiotic “guarantee” based on nothing but emotion. One you believe may be proven right “within days”. Laughable. So the white house itself validated that these findings did in fact occur and it was labeled as top secret. Curious, if I say something or if a source just goes rogue with information that is not true does that get marked as top secret as well? "This alleged assessment is flat-out wrong and was classified as 'top secret' but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told CNN in response to the outlet's reporting. "The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program," Leavitt added. "Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration."
JDHillFan Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Mikie2times said: So the white house itself validated that these findings did in fact occur and it was labeled as top secret. Curious, if I say something or if a source just goes rogue with information that is not true does that get marked as top secret as well? "This alleged assessment is flat-out wrong and was classified as 'top secret' but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told CNN in response to the outlet's reporting. "The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program," Leavitt added. "Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration." There was “intelligence” that said Trump was into golden showers. If you want to put your faith in the “there was minimal damage caused by fourteen 30,000lb bombs” intelligence, I think you should. They say the third time is a charm so I will ask you a final time - do you believe the Iranians outsmarted Israeli intelligence and were able to squirrel their nuclear materials to safety?
Taro T Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 1 hour ago, Mikie2times said: The president saying 5 seconds after it happened: "have been completely and totally obliterated." But CNN is the misinformation here? I guarantee the Iranian ability to generate Nuclear weapons is still present and the following months will prove that. It might only take days. If I'm wrong I will never post in the PPP forum again. How confident are you? One thing to remember about any of CNN's reporting, at least for the next 3-1/2 years, is that most of their insiders that held securitiy clearances even after leaving government service had them revoked by 47. So, in a matter like this, they're either getting told by somebody still working in the government that is leaking classified information or they're making it up as they go. A significant portion of their former sources have dried up. 1
Big Blitz Posted 8 hours ago Author Posted 8 hours ago No one find it odd that China nor Russia picked up our global flight to carry this out. Or they did, and let it happen. The world has been put on notice. Everyone wanted this done.
Mikie2times Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago (edited) 10 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: There was “intelligence” that said Trump was into golden showers. If you want to put your faith in the “there was minimal damage caused by fourteen 30,000lb bombs” intelligence, I think you should. They say the third time is a charm so I will ask you a final time - do you believe the Iranians outsmarted Israeli intelligence and were able to squirrel their nuclear materials to safety? Sorry captain, the standard set by truth teller is completely obliterated and that golden shower analogy doesn't really hit home (unless it's your home). The White House authenticated it was a real story. To what level remains to be seen. Do you believe those trucks coming and going from the Nuclear facilities were just bringing concrete? You might be right on this. We really don't know, but the president is not right. Its been a couple days and his need for parading himself around before knowing anything is unraveling. Any sensible person would have simply said the mission was a success, we believe the nuclear threat is contained, and our intelligence community will be working hard in the coming days to verify those findings. Instead he chose, obliterated, no longer functional, and completely destroyed. It's the difference between qualified and unqualified, presidential and pedestrian. He was so eager to pat his back he couldn't even wait a few days. 8 minutes ago, Taro T said: One thing to remember about any of CNN's reporting, at least for the next 3-1/2 years, is that most of their insiders that held securitiy clearances even after leaving government service had them revoked by 47. So, in a matter like this, they're either getting told by somebody still working in the government that is leaking classified information or they're making it up as they go. A significant portion of their former sources have dried up. I would be more inclined to agree with you if the white house didn't already acknowledge it and it being top secret. Making up as they go is not what this is. It could be incorrect? Sure, Trump could do his best to ensure that is the perception? That's a certainty. Edited 8 hours ago by Mikie2times
JDHillFan Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Mikie2times said: Sorry captain, the standard set by truth teller is completely obliterated and that golden shower analogy doesn't really hit home (unless it's your home). The White House authenticated it was a real story. To what level remains to be seen. Do you believe those trucks coming and going from the Nuclear facilities were just bringing concrete? You might be right on this. We really don't know, but the president is not right. Its been a couple days and his need for parading himself around before knowing anything is unraveling. Any sensible person would have simply said the mission was a success, we believe the nuclear threat is contained, and our intelligence community will be working hard in the coming days to verify those findings. Instead he chose, obliterated, no longer functional, and completely destroyed. It's the difference between qualified and unqualified, presidential and pedestrian. He was so eager to pat his back he couldn't even wait a few days. I would be more inclined to agree with you if the white house didn't already acknowledge it and it being top secret. Making up as they go is not what this is. It could be incorrect? Sure, Trump could do his best to ensure that is the perception? That's a certainty. The entire situation is about Trump for you. You have plenty of company in feeling that way. Looking forward to you being proven right within days.
Recommended Posts