JFKjr Posted April 23 Posted April 23 On 4/21/2025 at 7:30 PM, daz28 said: You sure about that??? The only corroboration I've seen is that a 'confidential source' said so, and that some cops in a parking lot said they "looked like it". That's it. I'm not defending the guy, but rather defending the facts of the matter. You'd have to assume that being here since 2011, they could provide some.....ANY evidence of it. Even a shred. His lawyer is claiming that the 'source' claimed he was part of a NYC chapter. He's never lived in NYC. He was never accused by El Salvador of a crime OR being MS-13 afaik, so why is he in prison there???? How did he commit crimes there, if he's been here since 2011???? Again, all I'm looking for is the FACTS. Also, he's not even an alleged wife beater. No current charges and no convictions ever. This is the victim's own statement on the matter: "After surviving domestic violence in a previous relationship, I acted out of caution following a disagreement with Kilmar by seeking a civil protective order, in case things escalated," she said. "Things did not escalate, and I decided not to follow through with the civil court process. We were able to work through the situation privately as a family, including by going to counseling." I presented what I perceive to be the facts, so go ahead and call me an unamerican, libera,l commie, ms13, spouse abuse enabler if you want, because I know some people are going to. All that aside, the courts feel that he did not receive proper due process for being deported under a wartime act(were not at war), where a street gang is labeled 'terrorist'. This guy has clearly never TERRORIZED anyone as far as any human has ever documented. Not even mentioning that he was sent to a prison(for no crime) in a country, which he HAD earned protection from. Oh yeah, the USA literally paid a dictator to put him in that prison. "DO" process! Love all the energy you're putting into defending this wife beater, human trafficker and gang member. It's a nice look.
K D Posted April 24 Posted April 24 Here are the rules the Dems want us to follow: - let in as many illegals as possible, even pay to fly them in - give them court dates 3-4 years in the future that they won't show to - try and track them down but you can't ask if they are legal because that's racist - if they are arrested in a sanctuary city then release them as fast as possible so ICE can't get them - allow them to wait years for the legal process to take place - in the meantime they are having kids that are automatically citizens by birth right - wait for Dems to get power and grant all of them citizenship anyhow Is that right? So it's rigged and they want us to play by the rules? How about if you came here illegally then you get deported? Sounds fair to me 1
daz28 Posted April 24 Posted April 24 (edited) 21 hours ago, JFKjr said: "DO" process! Love all the energy you're putting into defending this wife beater, human trafficker and gang member. It's a nice look. Hmph, I thought I was defending the facts of the matter, which you put zero effort into discovering. In fact, you're STILL blatantly denying them. The good news is, when you're being slandered, I'll be there for ya, buddy. Edited April 24 by daz28
T master Posted April 24 Posted April 24 On 4/16/2025 at 11:31 AM, The Frankish Reich said: Warning: this is a serious topic, intended to initiate a serious discussion. Abrego-Garcia, the guy stuck in the Salvadoran prison. Did he have "due process?" Yes and no. In his deportation proceeding, yes. The core of due process: (1) notice of what the government is trying to do to deprive you of life, liberty, or property. (2) an opportunity to meaningfully respond. (3) a decision made by a neutral official (at a minimum, not the same person/board that initiated the proceeding. Abrego-Garcia was issued a notice to appear before an immigration judge telling him he was subject to deportation because he came into the United States illegally and didn't have permission to stay. That was uncontroversial. He was given the opportunity to apply for protection from removal as provided by U.S. treaty obligations and statutes. He was given a full and fair hearing. The judge found he was subject to deportation, but that he had shown that it is more likely than not that he would be subject to persecution if returned to El Salvador. The Department of Homeland Security serves as the prosecutor, and they may appeal. They didn't. Therefore, the final order - considered an order of the Attorney General acting through his designated officials - was that he could not be removed to El Salvador. He was removed to El Salvador. I'm not sure whether he was removed under the Alien Enemies Act. It seems like he was, since he couldn't be removed to El Salvador under the Immigration Judge's order. Was he given "due process?" No. He could have been informed that he was being shipped back to El Salvador, in which he would have objected that the judge's order prohibits that. He would've been right. Even under the Alien Enemies Act (I can't tell if it was invoked here), the Supreme Court said 9-0 that you get some kind of process. Maybe it's a quick/easy process in which you can say "you've got the wrong guy, I'm not Abrego-Garcia." Or "I am Abrego-Garcia, but you are subject to a valid order precluding you from sending me to El Salvador." Or "I am Abrego-Garcia, but I don't fit under the Alien Enemies Act because I am not, and have never been, a member of a gang." We'd have to see how involved the hearing would get; that's usually set by published rules. And then some neutral official would have to say "I ratify the removal" or "I find that you can't remove him under that charge." That's it. The Trump Administration violated the law. It is making no efforts to undo it's error. So this is outrageous, ridiculous, and dangerous to the rule of law (not "democracy;" something more basic, the rule of law). Period. From anything I have heard he has been deported 2 other times due to violating or breaking the law and being then thought he could just get married to become a US citizen and should have been deported for his past violations and then after he came back and got married he was convicted of spousal abuse so then there's that . This entire thing sounds like the narrative during the "Peaceful Protests" a few years back to which were nothing peaceful at all but twisted by some libs to want others to believe that's what was happening and seeing as 2 different judges have found this person to be in some way affiliated with MS 13 I'd say where there's smoke there's fire ...
Homelander Posted April 26 Posted April 26 It’s only a matter of time before the regime turns on the very idiots who voted it in—because it always does. But MAGA’s programmed worse than a gas station touchscreen in July: glitchy, unresponsive, and somehow still blames Biden when it breaks.
aristocrat Posted April 26 Posted April 26 6 hours ago, Homelander said: It’s only a matter of time before the regime turns on the very idiots who voted it in—because it always does. But MAGA’s programmed worse than a gas station touchscreen in July: glitchy, unresponsive, and somehow still blames Biden when it breaks. mother deported her own child more like it
All_Pro_Bills Posted April 26 Posted April 26 On 4/24/2025 at 5:04 PM, T master said: From anything I have heard he has been deported 2 other times due to violating or breaking the law and being then thought he could just get married to become a US citizen and should have been deported for his past violations and then after he came back and got married he was convicted of spousal abuse so then there's that . This entire thing sounds like the narrative during the "Peaceful Protests" a few years back to which were nothing peaceful at all but twisted by some libs to want others to believe that's what was happening and seeing as 2 different judges have found this person to be in some way affiliated with MS 13 I'd say where there's smoke there's fire ... What I'm tired of hearing from the same people that cheered on the Biden adminitration ignoring and violating immigration and Customs requirements for entry into the country and what amounts to permanent residence along with their preposterous claims they couldn't stop millions from crossing the border is the insistence that after due process and law we're waived to allow 20 million to cross is their sudden insistence that law and due process must just as suddenly be strictly followed. The objective is to flood the courts with millions of cases to adjudicate so the courts cannot operate to allow everyone to stay.
nedboy7 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago On 4/24/2025 at 5:39 AM, K D said: Here are the rules the Dems want us to follow: - let in as many illegals as possible, even pay to fly them in - give them court dates 3-4 years in the future that they won't show to - try and track them down but you can't ask if they are legal because that's racist - if they are arrested in a sanctuary city then release them as fast as possible so ICE can't get them - allow them to wait years for the legal process to take place - in the meantime they are having kids that are automatically citizens by birth right - wait for Dems to get power and grant all of them citizenship anyhow Is that right? So it's rigged and they want us to play by the rules? How about if you came here illegally then you get deported? Sounds fair to me Liberals are crazy so ***** the constitution. That’s your take? lol. How about just follow the constitution. You all cried about it for years. Biden was a disaster on immigration. Do better. Don’t rationalize fascism.
The Frankish Reich Posted 4 hours ago Author Posted 4 hours ago 59 minutes ago, Homelander said: That's just a stunning (and I'd say deliberate) misreading of the constitution. Even setting aside the citizens vs. aliens thing, it is clear that the 5th Amendment applies to things other than "a criminal defendant facing prosecution." Again, just read the 5th Amendment: "No person shall ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law." Arresting and detaining an alien deprives him of "liberty" whether it is for a criminal or civil proceeding. That has been clearly established. Disgusting ignorance, or more likely, an attempt to convince the ignorant MAGAs of the constitutionality of arrest and detention and deportation without any due process whatsoever.
K D Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 23 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: Liberals are crazy so ***** the constitution. That’s your take? lol. How about just follow the constitution. You all cried about it for years. Biden was a disaster on immigration. Do better. Don’t rationalize fascism. It's fascism to deport illegal immigrants? The key word there is illegal. Pretty simple. Are you a citizen? No. Ok bye bye! What Biden did was HUMAN TRAFFICKING and people should be in jail. I see absolutely nothing wrong with sending these trafficked people back home and right the wrongs of the previous administration. This is what 80% of voters want. 1
nedboy7 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Just now, K D said: It's fascism to deport illegal immigrants? The key word there is illegal. Pretty simple. Are you a citizen? No. Ok bye bye! What Biden did was HUMAN TRAFFICKING and people should be in jail. I see absolutely nothing wrong with sending these trafficked people back home and right the wrongs of the previous administration. This is what 80% of voters want. Dont be an uneducated emotional idiot. Read and educate yourself about your own countries constitution. Its fascism to ignore the constitution regardless of why. MAGA doesnt seem to get this. What Biden did has nothing to do what needs to happen now. https://clearwaterlawgrouptricities.com/5-rights-of-undocumented-immigrants/ 1
K D Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 17 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: Dont be an uneducated emotional idiot. Read and educate yourself about your own countries constitution. Its fascism to ignore the constitution regardless of why. MAGA doesnt seem to get this. What Biden did has nothing to do what needs to happen now. https://clearwaterlawgrouptricities.com/5-rights-of-undocumented-immigrants/ First paragraph: "(the Constitution) doesn’t permit foreigners to enter the US without going through the proper channels" The previous administration unconstitutionally allowed illegal threats into our country. The only result of that is people go to jail or everyone who they let in is removed and then no harm no foul. By your interpretation, a foreign army could penetrate our border and then we aren't allowed to remove them. So it allows for an invasion? That's ridiculous and makes no sense. Imagine the founding fathers who just kicked out the British to be like "we need to make it impossible to kick out people from other countries who are here illegally." 1
The Frankish Reich Posted 3 hours ago Author Posted 3 hours ago 5 minutes ago, K D said: Imagine the founding fathers who just kicked out the British to be like "we need to make it impossible to kick out people from other countries who are here illegally." Well they did require due process, so they didn't make it impossible, just a little more fair. Sorry if you don't like it; maybe this isn't the country and constitution for you?
K D Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 10 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Well they did require due process, so they didn't make it impossible, just a little more fair. Sorry if you don't like it; maybe this isn't the country and constitution for you? So the British invade and they have to capture them 1 by 1 and have a jury trial? Riiiiight. That's not what they intended and you know it.
Pokebball Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 50 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: Dont be an uneducated emotional idiot. Read and educate yourself about your own countries constitution. Its fascism to ignore the constitution regardless of why. MAGA doesnt seem to get this. What Biden did has nothing to do what needs to happen now. https://clearwaterlawgrouptricities.com/5-rights-of-undocumented-immigrants/ All I can say is, "Dont be an uneducated emotional idiot"
The Frankish Reich Posted 3 hours ago Author Posted 3 hours ago 12 minutes ago, K D said: So the British invade and they have to capture them 1 by 1 and have a jury trial? Riiiiight. That's not what they intended and you know it. So our current illegal aliens are just like the Redcoats sent by Order of King George. Yeah, right.
K D Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 5 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: So our current illegal aliens are just like the Redcoats sent by Order of King George. Yeah, right. They are worse. Many of them are gang members who have no loyalty or decorum whatsoever. Much more dangerous and once infiltrated it's tough to find them. They aren't lined up in a field wearing bright red coats
Recommended Posts