Trump​ ❤️ Tariffs

[Roundybout]

17 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said:

I bet you used the caveat "consequence" to ensure even if something does change you can claim its not of "consequence" 

No, I used that word because it’s going to be a minute change that Trump will throw a parade over. Remember what he did to announce that China said they’d give us a call about a meeting about a deal? 

[SCBills]

2 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

Agreed.  MAGAs aren't ideologues.  ism's mean nothing as long as policies personally help them.  Maybe a new ideology  name: "selfishism".  Racism as a corollary.

This is literally every voting group.

 

Poor white people vote for politicians that speak to and/or push policy that helps them.

 

Poor black people do the same thing.  Wtf do you think they are voting for when they support Democrats at a 90% clip?

 

I love how libs get upset when white people vote for their own interests.  Everyone does this. 
 

 

Edited May 8 by SCBills

[Big Blitz]

Brick by brick.  

[Roundybout]

3 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

Brick by brick.  

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
 

 

 

Edited May 8 by Roundybout

[thenorthremembers]

24 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

No, I used that word because it’s going to be a minute change that Trump will throw a parade over. Remember what he did to announce that China said they’d give us a call about a meeting about a deal? 

My only memory of his phone call with China is China saying it didnt happen.   

[Roundybout]

 

 

And the 10% tax on American consumers remains. 
 

An absolute utter failure. 

[Motorin']

25 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

Brick by brick.  

 

There is a very narrow path for liberals with TDS to walk here.

 

Here's their rules of engagement. 

 

1. All posts about Trump must include failure, ridicule or contempt. 

 

2. Trump can never win at anything.

 

3. ABC - Always Be Campaigning (for the next election cycle).

 

 

Here's my suggested highlight: UK makes deal with convicted felon, rapist. 

 

Edited May 8 by Motorin'

[Roundybout]

3 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

 

There is a very narrow path for liberals with TDS to walk here.

 

Here's their rules of engagement. 

 

1. All posts about Trump must include failure, ridicule or contempt. 

 

2. Trump can never win at anything.

 

3. ABC - Always Be Campaigning (for the next election cycle).

 

 

Here's my suggested highlight: UK makes deal with convicted felon, rapist. 

 

This deal accomplishes nothing of note. It’s Dubya doing the “mission accomplished” banner over and over 

[Motorin']

1 minute ago, Roundybout said:

This deal accomplishes nothing of note. It’s Dubya doing the “mission accomplished” banner over and over 

 

Your post only carries water if the trade deal never goes into place.

 

To carry your analogy forward, the idea that the UK government is now the mujahedeen standing in resistance to America's victory in Iraq is laughable. 

 

They want the trade deal and military partnership. They're not about to hold up in Fallujah and fight to the last man to keep the imperial forces of US beef out of England. Dummy. 

[Doc]

1 minute ago, Motorin' said:

Your post only carries water if the trade deal never goes into place.

 

To carry your analogy forward, the idea that the UK government is now the mujahedeen standing in resistance to America's victory in Iraq is laughable. 

 

They want the trade deal and military partnership. They're not about to hold up in Fallujah and fight to the last man to keep the imperial forces of US beef out of England. Dummy. 

 

They have nothing left but to lie about it meaning/doing nothing.

[Roundybout]

2 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

 

Your post only carries water if the trade deal never goes into place.

 

To carry your analogy forward, the idea that the UK government is now the mujahedeen standing in resistance to America's victory in Iraq is laughable. 

 

They want the trade deal and military partnership. They're not about to hold up in Fallujah and fight to the last man to keep the imperial forces of US beef out of England. Dummy. 

Sure they will, because the deal states that UK beef standards are still in place. 
 

They won’t import beef that doesn’t meet their health and welfare standards. 
 

https://www.thegrocer.co.uk/news/uk-us-deal-to-include-agrifoods-but-government-draws-red-line-on-hormone-beef-and-chlorinated-chicken/704236.article

 

 

Dummy. 

[Motorin']

1 minute ago, Roundybout said:

Sure they will, because the deal states that UK beef standards are still in place. 
 

They won’t import beef that doesn’t meet their health and welfare standards. 
 

https://www.thegrocer.co.uk/news/uk-us-deal-to-include-agrifoods-but-government-draws-red-line-on-hormone-beef-and-chlorinated-chicken/704236.article

 

 

Dummy. 

 

So there's no comprehensive deal if hormone and chlorinated beef isn't accepted? 

 

 

And just for the record - you're pro-hormones and chlorine in your food and anti-US / UK trade deal. Noted!

 

***** dummy

 

 

[Roundybout]

11 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

 

So there's no comprehensive deal if hormone and chlorinated beef isn't accepted? 

 

 

And just for the record - you're pro-hormones and chlorine in your food and anti-US / UK trade deal. Noted!

 

***** dummy

 

 

You said this deal was to get US beef in the UK market. 
 

I responded by saying it’s not really much of a change because the beef exporters here still have to respect UK beef standards. 
 

It’s a nothing burger deal. Pun intended.

[Motorin']

4 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

You said this deal was to get US beef in the UK market. 
 

I responded by saying it’s not really much of a change because the beef exporters here still have to respect UK beef standards. 
 

It’s a nothing burger deal. Pun intended.

 

Omg. I'm talking to a brick wall. 

[AlBUNDY4TDS]

1 minute ago, Motorin' said:

 

Omg. I'm talking to a brick wall. 

Put him on ignore.

[Roundybout]

2 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

 

Omg. I'm talking to a brick wall. 

You could try reading the article I linked instead of spluttering like a ninny 

[Motorin']

2 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

You could try reading the article I linked instead of spluttering like a ninny 

 

Spluttering ninny should be your tag line. 

[Roundybout]

2 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

 

Spluttering ninny should be your tag line. 

You actually believe this is a “comprehensive deal?”

[Joe Ferguson forever]

1 hour ago, SCBills said:

This is literally every voting group.

 

Poor white people vote for politicians that speak to and/or push policy that helps them.

 

Poor black people do the same thing.  Wtf do you think they are voting for when they support Democrats at a 90% clip?

 

I love how libs get upset when white people vote for their own interests.  Everyone does this. 
 

 

I've voted consistently for higher taxes on my income bracket and more social safety net spending.  So have many liberals (again, look at the demographics).  Any D in the top 30% or so, is voting against their own financial interest.  So no, everyone doesn't do this...

 

Silver lining, trump's social security income tax proposal and renewal of tax breaks pays for several nice vacations a year if they go through  (I'll believe it when I see it).  Would I EVER vote for him because of that?  NO WAY.

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

33 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

I've voted consistently for higher taxes on my income bracket and more social safety net spending.  So have many liberals (again, look at the demographics).  Any D in the top 30% or so, is voting against their own financial interest.  So no, everyone doesn't do this...

 

Silver lining, trump's social security income tax proposal and renewal of tax breaks pays for several nice vacations a year if they go through  (I'll believe it when I see it).  Would I EVER vote for him because of that?  NO WAY.

 

You're not unusual in that regard, plenty of conservatives, independents and agnostics have done so.  My thought is that asking/requiring efficiency in tax and spending is the place the dialogue should start, and tax decreases (or increases if necessary) not at constantly filling a bucket with a massive hole in the bottom. 

 

Besides, you can still contribute and really shouldn't need a compulsory tax law to handle the transfer of money.