thenorthremembers Posted Thursday at 02:42 PM Posted Thursday at 02:42 PM 6 minutes ago, Roundybout said: I bet you nothing of consequence changes. I bet you used the caveat "consequence" to ensure even if something does change you can claim its not of "consequence" 1
K D Posted Thursday at 02:56 PM Posted Thursday at 02:56 PM 12 minutes ago, Roundybout said: I bet you nothing of consequence changes. You sound like my friend that thinks all billionaires are idiots and terrible business men and meanwhile he lives in a tiny house in a cookie cutter development and has done nothing of substance with his life. But he could if he wanted to...sure. I run multiple businesses and I don't know an ounce of what these guys know. The average person posting on the internet doesn't know squat. There's deals being made by the 1% of the 1% that we will never hear about. If they are so quick to announce this deal you best believe we raked them over the coals and got everything we wanted and that's why they are so excited about it. 1 1
Roundybout Posted Thursday at 03:01 PM Posted Thursday at 03:01 PM 17 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said: I bet you used the caveat "consequence" to ensure even if something does change you can claim its not of "consequence" No, I used that word because it’s going to be a minute change that Trump will throw a parade over. Remember what he did to announce that China said they’d give us a call about a meeting about a deal?
SCBills Posted Thursday at 03:02 PM Posted Thursday at 03:02 PM (edited) 2 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Agreed. MAGAs aren't ideologues. ism's mean nothing as long as policies personally help them. Maybe a new ideology name: "selfishism". Racism as a corollary. This is literally every voting group. Poor white people vote for politicians that speak to and/or push policy that helps them. Poor black people do the same thing. Wtf do you think they are voting for when they support Democrats at a 90% clip? I love how libs get upset when white people vote for their own interests. Everyone does this. Edited Thursday at 03:03 PM by SCBills
Roundybout Posted Thursday at 03:23 PM Posted Thursday at 03:23 PM (edited) 3 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Brick by brick. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Edited Thursday at 03:24 PM by Roundybout
thenorthremembers Posted Thursday at 03:26 PM Posted Thursday at 03:26 PM 24 minutes ago, Roundybout said: No, I used that word because it’s going to be a minute change that Trump will throw a parade over. Remember what he did to announce that China said they’d give us a call about a meeting about a deal? My only memory of his phone call with China is China saying it didnt happen.
Roundybout Posted Thursday at 03:27 PM Posted Thursday at 03:27 PM And the 10% tax on American consumers remains. An absolute utter failure.
Motorin' Posted Thursday at 03:46 PM Posted Thursday at 03:46 PM (edited) 25 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Brick by brick. There is a very narrow path for liberals with TDS to walk here. Here's their rules of engagement. 1. All posts about Trump must include failure, ridicule or contempt. 2. Trump can never win at anything. 3. ABC - Always Be Campaigning (for the next election cycle). Here's my suggested highlight: UK makes deal with convicted felon, rapist. Edited Thursday at 03:47 PM by Motorin' 1 1
Roundybout Posted Thursday at 03:51 PM Posted Thursday at 03:51 PM 3 minutes ago, Motorin' said: There is a very narrow path for liberals with TDS to walk here. Here's their rules of engagement. 1. All posts about Trump must include failure, ridicule or contempt. 2. Trump can never win at anything. 3. ABC - Always Be Campaigning (for the next election cycle). Here's my suggested highlight: UK makes deal with convicted felon, rapist. This deal accomplishes nothing of note. It’s Dubya doing the “mission accomplished” banner over and over
Motorin' Posted Thursday at 03:54 PM Posted Thursday at 03:54 PM 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: This deal accomplishes nothing of note. It’s Dubya doing the “mission accomplished” banner over and over Your post only carries water if the trade deal never goes into place. To carry your analogy forward, the idea that the UK government is now the mujahedeen standing in resistance to America's victory in Iraq is laughable. They want the trade deal and military partnership. They're not about to hold up in Fallujah and fight to the last man to keep the imperial forces of US beef out of England. Dummy. 1
Doc Posted Thursday at 03:56 PM Posted Thursday at 03:56 PM 1 minute ago, Motorin' said: Your post only carries water if the trade deal never goes into place. To carry your analogy forward, the idea that the UK government is now the mujahedeen standing in resistance to America's victory in Iraq is laughable. They want the trade deal and military partnership. They're not about to hold up in Fallujah and fight to the last man to keep the imperial forces of US beef out of England. Dummy. They have nothing left but to lie about it meaning/doing nothing. 1
Roundybout Posted Thursday at 03:58 PM Posted Thursday at 03:58 PM 2 minutes ago, Motorin' said: Your post only carries water if the trade deal never goes into place. To carry your analogy forward, the idea that the UK government is now the mujahedeen standing in resistance to America's victory in Iraq is laughable. They want the trade deal and military partnership. They're not about to hold up in Fallujah and fight to the last man to keep the imperial forces of US beef out of England. Dummy. Sure they will, because the deal states that UK beef standards are still in place. They won’t import beef that doesn’t meet their health and welfare standards. https://www.thegrocer.co.uk/news/uk-us-deal-to-include-agrifoods-but-government-draws-red-line-on-hormone-beef-and-chlorinated-chicken/704236.article Dummy.
Motorin' Posted Thursday at 04:02 PM Posted Thursday at 04:02 PM 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: Sure they will, because the deal states that UK beef standards are still in place. They won’t import beef that doesn’t meet their health and welfare standards. https://www.thegrocer.co.uk/news/uk-us-deal-to-include-agrifoods-but-government-draws-red-line-on-hormone-beef-and-chlorinated-chicken/704236.article Dummy. So there's no comprehensive deal if hormone and chlorinated beef isn't accepted? And just for the record - you're pro-hormones and chlorine in your food and anti-US / UK trade deal. Noted! ***** dummy
Roundybout Posted Thursday at 04:14 PM Posted Thursday at 04:14 PM 11 minutes ago, Motorin' said: So there's no comprehensive deal if hormone and chlorinated beef isn't accepted? And just for the record - you're pro-hormones and chlorine in your food and anti-US / UK trade deal. Noted! ***** dummy You said this deal was to get US beef in the UK market. I responded by saying it’s not really much of a change because the beef exporters here still have to respect UK beef standards. It’s a nothing burger deal. Pun intended.
Motorin' Posted Thursday at 04:19 PM Posted Thursday at 04:19 PM 4 minutes ago, Roundybout said: You said this deal was to get US beef in the UK market. I responded by saying it’s not really much of a change because the beef exporters here still have to respect UK beef standards. It’s a nothing burger deal. Pun intended. Omg. I'm talking to a brick wall.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted Thursday at 04:20 PM Posted Thursday at 04:20 PM 1 minute ago, Motorin' said: Omg. I'm talking to a brick wall. Put him on ignore. 1
Roundybout Posted Thursday at 04:21 PM Posted Thursday at 04:21 PM 2 minutes ago, Motorin' said: Omg. I'm talking to a brick wall. You could try reading the article I linked instead of spluttering like a ninny
Motorin' Posted Thursday at 04:24 PM Posted Thursday at 04:24 PM 2 minutes ago, Roundybout said: You could try reading the article I linked instead of spluttering like a ninny Spluttering ninny should be your tag line.
Roundybout Posted Thursday at 04:27 PM Posted Thursday at 04:27 PM 2 minutes ago, Motorin' said: Spluttering ninny should be your tag line. You actually believe this is a “comprehensive deal?”
Recommended Posts