Jump to content

SCOTUS Will Hear Colorado Removing Trump From Ballot Case Update SCOTUS Reverses CO SC 9-0.


Recommended Posts

 

 

The Supreme Court case.... is unanimous and in Trump's favor.

 

 Here's the full text. From the per curiam opinion:

 

Because the Constitution makes Congress, rather than the States, responsible for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates, we reverse....

All nine Members of the Court agree with that result.

Our colleagues writing separately further agree with many of the reasons this opinion provides for reaching it. See post, Part I (joint opinion of SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, and JACKSON, JJ.); see also post, p. 1 (opinion of BARRETT, J.). So far as we can tell, they object only to our taking into account the distinctive way Section 3 works and the fact that Section 5 vests in Congress the power to enforce it. These are not the only reasons the States lack power to enforce this particular constitutional provision with respect to federal offices. But they are important ones, and it is the combination of all the reasons set forth in this opinion—not, as some of our colleagues would have it, just one particular rationale—that resolves this case. In our view, each of these reasons is necessary to provide a complete explanation for the judgment the Court unanimously reaches. 

 

ADDED: The per curiam opinion emphasizes the role of Congress in determining that Section 3 applies to someone:

 

By Ann Althouse

 

https://althouse.blogspot.com/2024/03/the-supreme-court-case.html

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

In her written opinion on the ruling, Justice Amy Coney Barrett explained the message she believes Americans should take away from the decision. 

 

"In my judgment, this is not the time to amplify disagreement with stridency. The Court has settled a politically charged issue in the volatile season of a Presidential election. Particularly in this circumstance, writings on the Court should turn the national temperature down, not up," Barrett wrote. "For present purposes, our differences are far less important than our unanimity: All nine Justices agree on the outcome of this case. That is the message Americans should take home."

 

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-719_19m2.pdf

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thankfully we have a Supreme Court.....for now.   Without them, Biden and his puppet master Obammy are no different than Putin.  Another candidate a threat - throw him in the Gulag to die like Navalny.   Courts not in your favor.  Abolish them. 

 

This latest ploy didn't work.  Next up - Clinton style assassination.   What a mess. 

 

        

Edited by Irv
  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

Emotions are the tool of the propagandist 

So let's see.  The Nazi left doesn't want police, promotes anarchism/riots, doesn't want the Supreme Court, wants non-citizens to vote, wants to remove opposition from the ballots...what kind of person thinks that this is a good idea???

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, phypon said:

So let's see.  The Nazi left doesn't want police, promotes anarchism/riots, doesn't want the Supreme Court, wants non-citizens to vote, wants to remove opposition from the ballots...what kind of person thinks that this is a good idea???

 

Communists.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, phypon said:

So let's see.  The Nazi left doesn't want police, promotes anarchism/riots, doesn't want the Supreme Court, wants non-citizens to vote, wants to remove opposition from the ballots...what kind of person thinks that this is a good idea???

 

Progress!

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, phypon said:

So let's see.  The Nazi left doesn't want police, promotes anarchism/riots, doesn't want the Supreme Court, wants non-citizens to vote, wants to remove opposition from the ballots...what kind of person thinks that this is a good idea???

The radical leftist on PPP. I’m sure they are fuming over this decision. The fact ALL 9 justices agreed should be a strong statement that what they did was unconstitutional. Thank GOD for the Supreme Court!

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 3
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Westside said:

The radical leftist on PPP. I’m sure they are fuming over this decision. The fact ALL 9 justices agreed should be a strong statement that what they did was unconstitutional. Thank GOD for the Supreme Court!

"Trust the process".  - Sean McDermott, circa 2017

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Said it before and will say it again:

 

God bless the USA and God bless Donald Trump!

 

To the progressives: Your despicable, evil, satanic and anti-democratic campaign will never work in a great Christian nation.

 

One down - three to go!

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, John from Riverside said:


by the way, idiot, it has been my opinion that he should not have been kept off the ballot the whole time, so ***** your eye roll

 

A serious question:

 

Why do progressives always default to insults when they disagree with someone?

 

It undermines anything you have to say.

 

  • Agree 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Doc said:

 

Why?  Did he actually think it would go the other way?

 

I know he defended the Colorado supreme court ruling vehemently. 

 

Wether he predicted SCOTUS would reverse, well nobody quoted him on that, so I don't know.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...