Jump to content

Jack Smith: Laughingstock


BillsFanNC

Recommended Posts

On 12/23/2023 at 9:08 PM, EasternOHBillsFan said:

 

TRUMP is the laughingstock... of the WORLD no less. FOUR different court venues for four different cases from varying degrees of criminality.

No, the libtards and their idiot chief of the US are the laughingstock of the WHOLE world. 

 

Edited by Unforgiven
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Unforgiven said:

No, the libtards and their idiot chief of the US are the laughingstock of the WHOLE world. 

 

 

Umm, no.... Trump is a criminal, an insurrectionist and a rapist <--(a jury SAID he was!) so yeah, whatever, Trumpturd cultist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Unforgiven said:

No, the libtards and their idiot chief of the US are the laughingstock of the WHOLE world.

 

Yup.  When he can't be charged because he's senile..

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, EasternOHBillsFan said:

 

Umm, no.... Trump is a criminal, an insurrectionist and a rapist <--(a jury SAID he was!) so yeah, whatever, Trumpturd cultist.

You're a lying, America hating idiot.

Have a bad life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

According to the report that you obviously have not read, he is  ot being charged due to lack of evidence

 

That he is a forgetful old man is part of the opinion in the report

 

I'll address this in the other thread.  But suffice it to say that even if it's his opinion he's senile, that was the most devastating part of the report.  It might have been better to admit Joke should be brought up on charges and not talk about his senility.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

 

 

Jack Smith’s Case Against Trump Appears to Be Falling Apart.

 

4b6cab97-c769-4377-8866-e86470f05b96-105

 

Special Counsel Jack Smith's efforts to imprison Donald Trump for mishandling classified documents have hit a few snags recently, and the latest snag is, indeed, a big one.

 

"Special Counsel Jack Smith could be blocked from using evidence against Donald Trump contained in grand jury investigation files, which were transferred to the former president's Florida classified documents case this week, a former prosecutor has suggested," reports Newsweek. "In 2023, a grand jury in Washington, D.C., heard evidence from witnesses—including Trump's attorney, Evan Corcoran—while considering whether charges should be brought against the former president and others for hoarding classified documents. However, Trump and his co-accused were later indicted in Florida and, under federal rules, the grand jury files were transferred on Monday to Trump-appointed judge, Aileen Cannon's court."

 

According to former prosecutor Bill Shipley, the transfer of the case from D.C. to Florida gives Judge Cannon control over what evidence can be included—especially testimony that may have violated attorney-client privilege.

 

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2024/03/29/jack-smiths-case-against-trump-appears-to-be-falling-apart-n4927763

 

 

.

  • Shocked 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

To clear up any confusion as to what Special Counsel Jack Smith sought to conceal in classified documents case, this is what Smith told Judge Cannon in Feb 2024 in response to Trump's motion to compel discovery from numerous govt agencies:

1) Defendants are not entitled to discovery of internal government correspondence and memoranda, or to documents that are otherwise privileged.

2) The Court Should Deny Defendants’ Requests for Evidence of 'Improper Coordination with NARA' and of 'Bias and Investigative Misconduct.'

3) The Court Should Deny Defendants’ Requests for Evidence Related to Trump’s Security Clearance With The Department of Energy.

4) The Court Should Deny Defendants’ Requests for Evidence Related to Secure Facilities at President Trump’s Residences.

5) The Court Should Deny Defendants’ Requests for Production of Materials Concerning the Search of Mar-a-Lago.

AND FINALLY:

6) Defendants’ Request for Unredacted Discovery of Materials Should Be Denied

 

 

 

  • Angry 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...