Jump to content

Fani Willis: Corrupt Marxist BLM Activist. Met with both WH and J6 Committee before Indicting Trump


Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...

 

 

Fani Willis Fails to Show Up For Debate

April 30, 2024

   

Democratic Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’ political opponent debated with an empty podium after Willis skipped the county’s first Democratic Party debate, local reports show.

 

Willis is the Georgia district attorney who brought forth the election inference case against former President Trump, charging him and 18 co-defendants with racketeering over allegations they tried to overthrow the 2020 election. Willis became embroiled in controversy when she was accused of having an “improper” relationship with the special counsel she hired, Nathan Wade.

 

A judge ordered Willis last month to either remove herself from the case or fire Wade, with Wade ultimately resigning.

 

The Fulton County Democratic Party held its first primary debate on Sunday, but Willis was a no-show, leaving her political opponent to take the stage alone, where he criticized his fellow Democrat for hiring a romantic partner for the high-level case.

 

https://www.offthepress.com/fani-willis-a-no-show-for-debate/

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

😂

 

 

Another case that is nothing more than a pathetic, failed attempt at smear campaign.  The only thing it's doing is making Trump stronger.  Thank you, Democrats!  What a mess.    

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said:

Another wall that was exposed as Dem lawfare 

 

 

AGAIN, moron tweets stuff to get the nutbars going, even though it's based in either a complete lack of knowledge or straight out lies:

 

One of the most striking features of appellate courts in the United States is also one of the least understood: Appellate courts rarely reverse lower court decisions. The data reviewed in this Article indicate that roughly 90% of appellate court decisions affirm lower court rulings

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, daz28 said:

AGAIN, moron tweets stuff to get the nutbars going, even though it's based in either a complete lack of knowledge or straight out lies:

 

One of the most striking features of appellate courts in the United States is also one of the least understood: Appellate courts rarely reverse lower court decisions. The data reviewed in this Article indicate that roughly 90% of appellate court decisions affirm lower court rulings

It could be because 90% of lower court rulings are based on sound and proper legal arguments and interpretations of the law where this case against Trump and other defendants may not be so clear cut? 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

It could be because 90% of lower court rulings are based on sound and proper legal arguments and interpretations of the law where this case against Trump and other defendants may not be so clear cut? 

Every appeal makes that claim.  Here's what he said, "Am I wrong in thinking that they would not take the appeal unless it was to reverse McAfee and disqualify? Why else take the case and delay the prosecution if only to affirm?".  Yes it is wrong to think that they would take a case, even when they have no reason to reverse, because reversal only happens 10% of the time.  

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...