sherpa Posted May 17, 2023 Share Posted May 17, 2023 12 minutes ago, redtail hawk said: yes, he was picked to deliver Va. He had an awful debate but is sharp as a whip and his own man. Very impressive in person and unlike almost all the R candidates, has integrity. He won't run. He consider retiring from the senate next election but is concerned youngkin will take the seat and possibly the senate majority. He believes that would be very bad and he's correct. I know you've said you met him, and I have as well. Twice, in the emergency exit isle, bot times, on New York to DC shuttle flights. Got into a conversation as he was the speaker at my son's college grad. We talked at length the first time about Virginia colleges and the programs to pay for them, which I had great deal of experience in, as my three kids each went to different state schools, Christopher Newport, Virginia Tech and UVA. The second time he was about to take over as Chairman of the Democrat National Committee, so we talked about that. Decent guy. A typical Virginian. Reasonable and centrist. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unforgiven Posted May 17, 2023 Share Posted May 17, 2023 He would only lose to cheating. No how no way are that many people progressively brain dead in America. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted May 18, 2023 Author Share Posted May 18, 2023 5 hours ago, Unforgiven said: He would only lose to cheating. No how no way are that many people progressively brain dead in America. How many mid terms did you feel that way about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted May 18, 2023 Share Posted May 18, 2023 (edited) On 5/16/2023 at 11:42 PM, Over 29 years of fanhood said: Spread the word. Trump is a loser. He might might win a primary but will never win the office. bring back balance of power. The only way Trump loses is if you give Republican primary voters only two choices. DeSantis would pry be the best choice but Haley/Scott/Pence/Hutchinson would also work. If not you'll see a repeat of 2016 where all the non Trump candidates will just take away each other's votes allowing Trump to win with around 30% in a lot of states. Democrats were able to do this in 2020 when Klobachar and Buttigeg dropped out right before Super Tuesday and threw their support behind Biden stopping Sanders from winning the nomination. They knew a self described socialist would've been destroyed in the general election. Trump could beat Biden if he stuck to the issues but another candidate would probably have a much better chance. Edited May 18, 2023 by Doc Brown 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt_In_NH Posted May 18, 2023 Share Posted May 18, 2023 16 hours ago, Tenhigh said: What do you mean? You have a problem with this guy? *Questionable cognitive ability. *Habitual liar. *Accused racist. *Accused sexual predator. *Questionable associates. *Known mishandler of classified documents. *Disturbing family ties to foreign nationals. *Has or has threatened to withhold aid to Ukraine for potentially less than savory reasons. *Can't negotiate stairs on AF1. *Gives away free money to people who don't need it. *Unwanted to run in 2024 by more that half the country. What's not to love? Honestly this list seems to describe both of those clowns. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 18, 2023 Share Posted May 18, 2023 8 hours ago, Doc Brown said: Trump could beat Biden if he stuck to the issues but another candidate would probably have a much better chance. Issues like abortion? Seriously? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted May 18, 2023 Share Posted May 18, 2023 (edited) 18 minutes ago, SUNY_amherst said: Very ironic that trump is the republican politician most likely to have paid for abortion(s) over the years and he also is the one who is most responsible for outlawing them The ironic part is it was a DEM funded PAC that fought the 15 week limit in Miss that took the entire topic to the supreme court. Without that high priced PACS actions, would Row still be a thing? Edited May 18, 2023 by Chris farley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenhigh Posted May 18, 2023 Share Posted May 18, 2023 8 hours ago, Matt_In_NH said: Honestly this list seems to describe both of those clowns. That is the point. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted May 19, 2023 Author Share Posted May 19, 2023 14 hours ago, SUNY_amherst said: is this english? Which part surpasses your interpretation abilities? We can help! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted May 19, 2023 Author Share Posted May 19, 2023 11 minutes ago, SUNY_amherst said: you need to get a life Don’t feel hurt. PAC is political action committee… does that help? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted May 19, 2023 Author Share Posted May 19, 2023 Just now, SUNY_amherst said: I’m not hurt, I kinda feel sorry for you. Every time you post it’s about the other guy’s personal life. That’s a sign of someone who has a pathetic life themselves Pac isn’t a personal life topic it’s political action committee Was that the confusing part? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted May 19, 2023 Author Share Posted May 19, 2023 1 minute ago, SUNY_amherst said: Not so much, although that was part of an off topic rant. The part that was confusing was when the poster was describing the Roe v. Wade case (I think) as Row cute that you have his back though - I think he can respond on his own pretty sure he was talking about Dobbs, which was was resurfaced abortion in the Supreme Court. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women's_Health_Organization i thought it was a good point. The irony a Dem pac pushed the case to the Supreme Court which led to the reversal. but I’m sure you knew all that right? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 1 minute ago, SUNY_amherst said: Ok cool, don't care you held a strong view it was the redubs that took it to the supreme court, (seems like you cared) when it was a DEM PAC fighting a 15-week limit. I was just trying to help you out by presenting facts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 1 minute ago, SUNY_amherst said: Ok glad you clarified, it was very unclear in your initial post. you're welcome, now you know the details. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted May 19, 2023 Author Share Posted May 19, 2023 10 minutes ago, Chris farley said: you're welcome, now you know the details. It takes a village 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenhigh Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 41 minutes ago, SUNY_amherst said: It really doesn't. You decided to chime in on your own. You were not asked nor did I really care about your interpretation. Let the man speak for himself You clearly had no idea what you were talking about, and he helped explain a simple concept. Usually I say thank you when someone gives me assistance, but you do you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenhigh Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 (edited) 2 minutes ago, SUNY_amherst said: more input from the peanut gallery that was not asked for, nor cared about It takes a village to raise the village idiot. 😀 Edited May 19, 2023 by Tenhigh 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts