The Walls be Closing

[L Ron Burgundy]

15 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

Biden is the Barry sanders of lying. Hell he had to back out of a presidential race in the 80s for lying and continues to this day lol. Trump was a politician for 5 minutes 

Dude he had fraudulent businesses.  F Biden too but go talk to someone from Trump University.   He's a pathological liar continously ripping off the gullible.   

[aristocrat]

10 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

Dude he had fraudulent businesses.  F Biden too but go talk to someone from Trump University.   He's a pathological liar continously ripping off the gullible.   

Nobody has caused more damage to this country than Biden. Talk to all the minorities who got jailed for the Biden crime bill and drug bill. 

[Kemp]

3 hours ago, aristocrat said:

I just googled the first 6 guys and 5 have books lol. You ***** moron 

 

5 out of the first 6, eh?

Priebus doesn't.

 

McMaster wrote a book, but it's NOT about Trump.

Mnuchin doesn't.

 

Cohn doesn't.

 

Kelly doesn't.

 

Mattis wrote a book, but it's NOT about Trump. 

 

Barr wrote a book that's partially about Trump.

 

Stone has a book PRAISING Trump.

Bannon doesn't.

 

Tillerson doesn't.

 

So, are you lying or inept?

 

You've taken the lead as the biggest liar/idiot on this board.
 

[aristocrat]

4 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

5 out of the first 6, eh?

Priebus doesn't.

 

McMaster wrote a book, but it's NOT about Trump.

Mnuchin doesn't.

 

Cohn doesn't.

 

Kelly doesn't.

 

Mattis wrote a book, but it's NOT about Trump. 

 

Barr wrote a book that's partially about Trump.

 

Stone has a book PRAISING Trump.

Bannon doesn't.

 

Tillerson doesn't.

 

So, are you lying or inept?

 

You've taken the lead as the biggest liar/idiot on this board.
 

look again. They’ve written books with trump in there.

[Kemp]

38 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

look again. They’ve written books with trump in there.

This was whether or not these people are all capitalizing on their time with Trump, as you alleged.

 

I detailed it all.

 

If one of them ever writes a cookbook, it is not evidence of your assertion. 

Since you can't be this stupid, you land squarely in the other column.
 

[Doc]

7 hours ago, aristocrat said:

Biden is the Barry sanders of lying. Hell he had to back out of a presidential race in the 80s for lying and continues to this day lol. Trump was a politician for 5 minutes 

 

No, Joke is the Emmett Smith of lying.  Longevity and a lot more of them. 
 

BTW, if Barry played as long as Emmett did/didn't retire as early as he did, he'd have the rushing record.

Edited December 11, 2023 by Doc

[aristocrat]

6 hours ago, Kemp said:

This was whether or not these people are all capitalizing on their time with Trump, as you alleged.

 

I detailed it all.

 

If one of them ever writes a cookbook, it is not evidence of your assertion. 

Since you can't be this stupid, you land squarely in the other column.
 

If trump is in the book it counts. That’s capitalizing on his name. You can’t be that stupid. 

[Kemp]

4 hours ago, aristocrat said:

If trump is in the book it counts. That’s capitalizing on his name. You can’t be that stupid. 

 

Yeah, that's what you meant by your original statement.

Your 5 out of 6 statement is STILL wrong, even under your new illogic.

 

That might be the funniest and saddest part of everything you've alleged on this topic.
 

[Kemp]

I know I'm shocked he chickened out. 

I'm equally shocked that his lawyer lied about him testifying.

He already lost the case he continues to rail about in front of cameras. It's all about the damages now.

His only hope now is that he becomes President in '24 so he can jail the AG and the judge and everyone else that has ever annoyed him.

Won't that be fun times in America.

[Kemp]

21 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

Yeah, that's what you meant by your original statement.

Your 5 out of 6 statement is STILL wrong, even under your new illogic.

 

That might be the funniest and saddest part of everything you've alleged on this topic.
 

 

At least Aristocrat tries, Tommy.

[BillStime]

 

[aristocrat]

4 hours ago, Kemp said:

 

Yeah, that's what you meant by your original statement.

Your 5 out of 6 statement is STILL wrong, even under your new illogic.

 

That might be the funniest and saddest part of everything you've alleged on this topic.
 

Why are you so bothered by this?

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

18 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

He wants to rush a decision fundamental to our democracy involving Presidential immunity based on an arbitrary scheduling issue?  March 4. April 4. June 4. July 4.  Is it that big a deal? 

 

Let's be sure to get it right.  It's already moving at lightning speed. 

[Kemp]

This didn't age well.

 

[BillStime]

39 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

He wants to rush a decision fundamental to our democracy involving Presidential immunity based on an arbitrary scheduling issue?  March 4. April 4. June 4. July 4.  Is it that big a deal? 

 

Let's be sure to get it right.  It's already moving at lightning speed. 

 

A Supreme Court Justice was confirmed 39 days after another's death. Therefore, SCOTUS should be able to issue a decision on presidential immunity before March 4th.

[Tommy Callahan]

 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

7 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

A Supreme Court Justice was confirmed 39 days after another's death. Therefore, SCOTUS should be able to issue a decision on presidential immunity before March 4th.

The Kavanaugh hearing took 89 days.  Clarence Thomas took 106.   Sotamayor took 72.  Justice Kagan 92.  

 

In each one of those cases, the only real question was whether or not some ginned up controversy would slow the process, or some political operative would attempt to intervene. 

 

The Mueller investigation, btw, lasted 22 months before Trump was flynndicated.  Some things take time.

 

In the Trump case, a political and legal firestorm has erupted, and as Smith himself has indicated, the very future of democracy might be at stake.  We're looking at 250+ years of history here, an unprecedented criminal complaint, and a chance to get it right.  We don't need a prosecutorial ants-in-the-pants outcome in spite of how happy it would make the opposition. 

 

 

 

 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

7 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

The Kavanaugh hearing took 89 days.  Clarence Thomas took 106.   Sotamayor took 72.  Justice Kagan 92.  

 

In each one of those cases, the only real question was whether or not some ginned up controversy would slow the process, or some political operative would attempt to intervene. 

 

The Mueller investigation, btw, lasted 22 months before Trump was flynndicated.  Some things take time.

 

In the Trump case, a political and legal firestorm has erupted, and as Smith himself has indicated, the very future of democracy might be at stake.  We're looking at 250+ years of history here, an unprecedented criminal complaint, and a chance to get it right.  We don't need a prosecutorial ants-in-the-pants outcome in spite of how happy it would make the opposition. 

 

 

 

 

cmon, you know trump's play is to pardon himself after he wins.  Is that justice to you?  that's what this is about.  we're not talking 100 days, he wants over a year.  stop being intellectually dishonest little lenny....btw, multiple recent conservative justices x possibly clarence uncle tom, lied about Roe being settled law....and why r u in favor of a dictatorship in America, lenny boy?

Edited December 11, 2023 by Joe Ferguson forever

[BillStime]

7 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

The Kavanaugh hearing took 89 days.  Clarence Thomas took 106.   Sotamayor took 72.  Justice Kagan 92.  

 

In each one of those cases, the only real question was whether or not some ginned up controversy would slow the process, or some political operative would attempt to intervene. 

 

The Mueller investigation, btw, lasted 22 months before Trump was flynndicated.  Some things take time.

 

In the Trump case, a political and legal firestorm has erupted, and as Smith himself has indicated, the very future of democracy might be at stake.  We're looking at 250+ years of history here, an unprecedented criminal complaint, and a chance to get it right.  We don't need a prosecutorial ants-in-the-pants outcome in spite of how happy it would make the opposition. 

 

 

 

 

 

You do realize you're making the case that the Supreme Court should hear this case in a timely manner, right? 

 

I mean, if we can appoint a LIFETIME POSITION to a SUPREME COURT JUDGE 8 DAYS BEFORE AN ELECTION (which Senate Republicans lost) - we damn well should have sufficient time for the SC to hear/decide this case about presidential immunity asap.

 

Nice try.
 

 

 

 

[John from Riverside]

7 hours ago, Kemp said:

I know I'm shocked he chickened out. 

I'm equally shocked that his lawyer lied about him testifying.

He already lost the case he continues to rail about in front of cameras. It's all about the damages now.

His only hope now is that he becomes President in '24 so he can jail the AG and the judge and everyone else that has ever annoyed him.

Won't that be fun times in America.

It’s gonna be awesome whenever she goes to only fans

22 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

cmon, you know trump's play is to pardon himself after he wins.  Is that justice to you?  that's what this is about.  we're not talking 100 days, he wants over a year.  stop being intellectually dishonest little lenny....btw, multiple recent conservative justices x possibly clarence uncle tom, lied about Roe being settled law....and why r u in favor of a dictatorship in America, lenny boy?

We have gotten so polarized into our positions that there is a side that actually hopes he can pardon himself