Biden clearly has dementia, you can admit that right? "Four more years....Pause"

[JDHillFan]

2 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

 

“I see no cognitive decline” 

 

- “Dr” redhawk

 

pray for his patients 

[Gregg]

3 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

 

 

But he will survive a 2nd term. Nobody including many Dems likes Kamala who is the one people would really be voting for. Only a matter of time before the Dems tell Joey to step down. 

Edited February 8 by Gregg

[Doc]

This is even more devastating to Joke than anyone could have anticipated.

[JDHillFan]

4 minutes ago, Doc said:

This is even more devastating to Joke than anyone could have anticipated.

Really excited to read some defenses of the old boy. They’re coming but can’t be easy to mount. Will be fun. 

[Tommy Callahan]

 

[Doc]

56 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

Really excited to read some defenses of the old boy. They’re coming but can’t be easy to mount. Will be fun. 

 

Criminal and senile.  They better start making plans to replace his ASAP.

[JDHillFan]

Lol

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

2 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said:

 

 

Quack MD will be altering its take.

 

Other than the special counsel, ALL OTHER accounts that he accepts as valid, say that Biden communicates better than he did decades ago.

 

[US Egg]

On 1/18/2024 at 11:48 AM, US Egg said:

Joe’s fall back plan:

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130867/#:~:text=A plea of “not guilty,by reason of insanity defenses.

 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES: “NOT GUILTY BY REASON OF DEMENTIA” AND THE AUTOMATISM DEFENSE 

Affirmative defenses acknowledge that a defendant has factually committed a crime (actus reas) but argue that an individual is not culpable based on a lack of or reduced mens rea. Two affirmative defenses are particularly relevant for individuals with dementia: creating a plea for “not guilty” by reason of dementia and the automatism defense. A plea of “not guilty” by reason of cognitive impairment or dementia could excuse criminal culpability, mirroring “not guilty” by reason of insanity defenses. A plea of “not guilty” by reason of cognitive impairment or dementia could excuse criminal culpability, mirroring “not guilty” by reason of insanity defenses. The automatism defense could serve as an alternative affirmative defense for individuals with dementia. As described above, the automatism defense argues that an individual’s illness or syndrome resulted in compulsive behavior (i.e., sleep walking). This defense would apply particularly well to people FTLD who may lack impulse control needed to prevent socially inappropriate actions, even if they know the action was “wrong.”

🤬

 

Edited February 9 by US Egg

[Doc]

So he was senile 3 years before being elected?  Shocker. 

 

But it's not a defense.  If he knew in 2017 that he had classified docs, he knew from the beginning. 

[BillsFanNC]

 

[Tiberius]

 

[JDHillFan]

3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

Yesterday was a rough day for you. Hang in there buddy!

[Chaos]

Ideally there should be no need for discussion about whether or not the commander in chief of the military suffers from or does not suffer from dementia. 

Edited February 9 by Chaos

[BillsFanNC]

With commies the story can never be the story.

 

The story is always Republicans noticing the story.

 

 

[JDHillFan]

“that late at night” - 7:45 pm. 

[Tiberius]

1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:

Yesterday was a rough day for you. Hang in there buddy!

Not really, but keep hoping misery on poor old me. I’m pretty upbeat 

[JDHillFan]

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Not really, but keep hoping misery on poor old me. I’m pretty upbeat 

You will be up and running calling people you disagree with scum/POS/traitor/etc in no time. You’ve got this, big guy!

[Tiberius]

2 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

You will be up and running calling people you disagree with scum/POS/traitor/etc in no time. You’ve got this, big guy!

That's right! 

 

You Putin stooges are on notice!