BillsFanNC Posted April 10 Author Share Posted April 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 11 Author Share Posted April 11 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 13 Author Share Posted April 13 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 15 Author Share Posted April 15 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capco Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 Sleepy Trump fell asleep in court today lol. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 7 minutes ago, Capco said: Sleepy Trump fell asleep in court today lol. He seems real worried... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capco Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 1 minute ago, Doc said: He seems real worried... Oh yeah, it's definitely that. It's not like people in their late 70s are known for nodding off or anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 3 minutes ago, Capco said: Oh yeah, it's definitely that. It's not like people in their late 70s are known for nodding off or anything. True, look at Biden. His day would have been lidded 6 hours ago... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 15 Author Share Posted April 15 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capco Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 3 minutes ago, Doc said: True, look at Biden. His day would have been lidded 6 hours ago... Ahhh. So THAT'S why there isn't an ounce of hypocrisy in this instance. Gotcha 👍 I guess I've been slacking on my mental gymnastics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 15 Author Share Posted April 15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 Just now, Capco said: Ahhh. So THAT'S why there isn't an ounce of hypocrisy in this instance. Gotcha 👍 I guess I've been slacking on my mental gymnastics. I was being sarcastic when I said that he was worried. He's not. Hence he wouldn't be sleeping in court. But why libs are so geeked about Trump falling asleep inside a boring courtroom when Biden does it so frequently they often times they have to put a lid on his day as early as 9 AM is curious. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capco Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 Just now, Doc said: I was being sarcastic when I said that he was worried. I'm aware lol, as I hope you're aware of my own sarcasm in my responses. Trump takes a nap after coining Sleepy Joe, so the natural defensive response is "oh yeah?! well... Biden takes more naps so 😛." Our politics have become so incredibly childish when you think about it. They are old and running for the most demanding office in the world. Of course they are going to nod off. Of all the things that worry me about a Trump or a Biden presidency, napping frequently simply doesn't make the list. Why it scares the daylights out of Republicans in Biden's case is beyond me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 13 minutes ago, Capco said: I'm aware lol, as I hope you're aware of my own sarcasm in my responses. Trump takes a nap after coining Sleepy Joe, so the natural defensive response is "oh yeah?! well... Biden takes more naps so 😛." Our politics have become so incredibly childish when you think about it. They are old and running for the most demanding office in the world. Of course they are going to nod off. Of all the things that worry me about a Trump or a Biden presidency, napping frequently simply doesn't make the list. Why it scares the daylights out of Republicans in Biden's case is beyond me. More like Dems gleefully pointing out that Trump fell asleep for the first time in public that probably anyone has seen, when Biden is worse...is hypocrisy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capco Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 6 minutes ago, Doc said: More like Dems gleefully pointing out that Trump fell asleep for the first time in public that probably anyone has seen, when Biden is worse...is hypocrisy. I don't see that as hypocrisy when it's preceded by the hypocrisy of calling someone out for something, then doing it themselves. I see that as splitting hairs in an attempt to save face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 53 minutes ago, Capco said: I don't see that as hypocrisy when it's preceded by the hypocrisy of calling someone out for something, then doing it themselves. I see that as splitting hairs in an attempt to save face. I would have waited for more than 1 instance. But that's just me. Again the difference in energy level between the 2 is marked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 15 Author Share Posted April 15 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 15 Author Share Posted April 15 We have Biden falling asleep as POTUS on VIDEO multiple times. With Trump we have reporting from a lying media who has lied repeatedly about Trump for years. So yeah. Go ***** yourselves commies. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 16 Author Share Posted April 16 Stephen Smith won't be welcome at ESPN much longer if he keeps up with the anti communist narrative. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 16 Author Share Posted April 16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 22 Author Share Posted April 22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted April 22 Share Posted April 22 51 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Meanwhile Biden willfully took, retained and shared classified info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 22 Author Share Posted April 22 (edited) Edited April 22 by BillsFanNC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 22 Author Share Posted April 22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 22 Author Share Posted April 22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 23 Author Share Posted April 23 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 23 Author Share Posted April 23 To clear up any confusion as to what Special Counsel Jack Smith sought to conceal in classified documents case, this is what Smith told Judge Cannon in Feb 2024 in response to Trump's motion to compel discovery from numerous govt agencies: 1) Defendants are not entitled to discovery of internal government correspondence and memoranda, or to documents that are otherwise privileged. 2) The Court Should Deny Defendants’ Requests for Evidence of 'Improper Coordination with NARA' and of 'Bias and Investigative Misconduct.' 3) The Court Should Deny Defendants’ Requests for Evidence Related to Trump’s Security Clearance With The Department of Energy. 4) The Court Should Deny Defendants’ Requests for Evidence Related to Secure Facilities at President Trump’s Residences. 5) The Court Should Deny Defendants’ Requests for Production of Materials Concerning the Search of Mar-a-Lago. AND FINALLY: 6) Defendants’ Request for Unredacted Discovery of Materials Should Be Denied. It's all right here... storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 23 Author Share Posted April 23 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 23 Author Share Posted April 23 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 23 Author Share Posted April 23 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 Judge Smacks Down Letitia James, Rules in Favor of Trump in Fight Over $175 Million Bond A judge on Monday smacked down Marxist tyrant Letitia James and ruled in favor of Trump in a fight over a $175 million bond. On Friday, Letitia James asked a judge to void Trump’s $175 million bond that he posted to appeal the civil fraud case Letitia James argued that California-based Knight Specialty Insurance Company (KSIC) is not approved to do business in New York. James also questioned whether KSIC has the funds to back up the $175 million bond Trump previously posted. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/breaking-judge-smacks-down-letitia-james-rules-favor/ , 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 Did Letitia James Accidentally Reveal the Real Reason for Her Trump Witch Hunt? MATT MARGOLIS FTA: James's legal team argued that the court should nullify Trump's reduced judgment of $175 million in his non-jury civil fraud trial. Her team raised concerns about the ability of Knight Specialty Insurance, the company behind the substantial bond, to actually pay the bond if necessary. That's a rather curious position since she had asked for a much larger $370 million in damages — it's as if the entire point was to achieve a judgment that would be impossible for Donald Trump to pay. It's as if the entire point of her case was to seize his assets under bogus pretenses and be a hero to the radical left. As you know, in February, leftist Judge Arthur Engoron fined Trump $454 million (including interest) for allegedly fraudulently inflating the value of his assets while seeking a loan to build a project. Trump paid the loan back in full, and the bank he supposedly defrauded testified in his defense. Simply put, there was no crime or victim. https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2024/04/22/letitia-james-challenge-to-trumps-175-million-bond-rejected-by-judge-n4928407 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 (edited) 5 hours ago, B-Man said: Did Letitia James Accidentally Reveal the Real Reason for Her Trump Witch Hunt? MATT MARGOLIS FTA: James's legal team argued that the court should nullify Trump's reduced judgment of $175 million in his non-jury civil fraud trial. Her team raised concerns about the ability of Knight Specialty Insurance, the company behind the substantial bond, to actually pay the bond if necessary. That's a rather curious position since she had asked for a much larger $370 million in damages — it's as if the entire point was to achieve a judgment that would be impossible for Donald Trump to pay. It's as if the entire point of her case was to seize his assets under bogus pretenses and be a hero to the radical left. As you know, in February, leftist Judge Arthur Engoron fined Trump $454 million (including interest) for allegedly fraudulently inflating the value of his assets while seeking a loan to build a project. Trump paid the loan back in full, and the bank he supposedly defrauded testified in his defense. Simply put, there was no crime or victim. https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2024/04/22/letitia-james-challenge-to-trumps-175-million-bond-rejected-by-judge-n4928407 These are all meant to drain him financially. Now on to the appeal... Edited April 23 by Doc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 26 Author Share Posted April 26 Well golly gee...ya think so? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 26 Author Share Posted April 26 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 Not for Dem da's with that privilege 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 Justice Thomas raised crucial question about legitimacy of special counsel's prosecution of Trump by Thomas Phippen Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas raised a question Thursday that goes to the heart of Special Counsel Jack Smith's charges against former President Donald Trump. The high court was considering Trump's argument that he is immune from prosecution for actions he took while president, but another issue is whether Smith and the Office of Special Counsel have the authority to bring charges at all. "Did you, in this litigation, challenge the appointment of special counsel?" Thomas asked Trump attorney John Sauer on Thursday during a nearly three-hour session at the Supreme Court. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/justice-thomas-raised-crucial-question-about-legitimacy-special-counsels-prosecution-trump . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 8 minutes ago, B-Man said: Justice Thomas raised crucial question about legitimacy of special counsel's prosecution of Trump by Thomas Phippen Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas raised a question Thursday that goes to the heart of Special Counsel Jack Smith's charges against former President Donald Trump. The high court was considering Trump's argument that he is immune from prosecution for actions he took while president, but another issue is whether Smith and the Office of Special Counsel have the authority to bring charges at all. "Did you, in this litigation, challenge the appointment of special counsel?" Thomas asked Trump attorney John Sauer on Thursday during a nearly three-hour session at the Supreme Court. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/justice-thomas-raised-crucial-question-about-legitimacy-special-counsels-prosecution-trump . And as Paul Harvey would've said, here's the rest of the story: Sauer replied that Trump's attorneys had not raised that concern "directly" in the current Supreme Court case — in which justices are considering Trump's arguments that presidential immunity precludes the prosecution of charges that the former president illegally sought to overturn the 2020 election. The short answer, then, is "no." The question is not properly before the Court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted Monday at 04:28 PM Share Posted Monday at 04:28 PM Of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts