Tiberius Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 Ya, the defense isn't counting on racist jurors to get an acquittal. Can't believe this even went to trail, but of course the three armed white men can count on a jury to look the other way after they killed an unarmed black guy. https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/22/us/ahmaud-arbery-trial-toenails-comment-outrage/index.html Quote "Turning Ahmaud Arbery into a victim after the choices that he made does not reflect the reality of what brought Ahmaud Arbery to Satilla Shores in his khaki shorts with no socks to cover his long, dirty toenails," Hogue told jurors. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Ya, the defense isn't counting on racist jurors to get an acquittal. Can't believe this even went to trail, but of course the three armed white men can count on a jury to look the other way after they killed an unarmed black guy. https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/22/us/ahmaud-arbery-trial-toenails-comment-outrage/index.html Clearly self defense, Tibs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangeBills Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 Disgusting comment from that Trial Lawyer, zero defending that. Also zero defending the behavior of the defendants, they are clearly racist scum who need to be punished. There is no place for this mindset in our society. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 23, 2021 Author Share Posted November 23, 2021 4 minutes ago, BillStime said: Clearly self defense, Tibs What else could those three armed men of done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 9 minutes ago, Tiberius said: What else could those three armed men of done? Call Kyle? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 I don’t think anyone thinks they’re innocent 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 I love the faux outrage by the PPP marxists. 😂😂😂 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 They're mad we are not acting the way they want us to. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 23, 2021 Author Share Posted November 23, 2021 12 minutes ago, Westside said: I love the faux outrage by the PPP marxists. 😂😂😂 Butt hurt much? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 14 minutes ago, Westside said: I love the faux outrage by the PPP marxists. 😂😂😂 9 minutes ago, Westside said: WTF are you talking about? Don’t let your racist inclination’s get in the way of coherent thought. I love how you label people you don’t even know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 So are you guys not happy they're about to be found guilty? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 23, 2021 Author Share Posted November 23, 2021 15 minutes ago, aristocrat said: So are you guys not happy they're about to be found guilty? That's hardly a 100% guarantee. The fact they didn't plead it out tells me they are counting on the Bubba jurors to hang the jury. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: That's hardly a 100% guarantee. The fact they didn't plead it out tells me they are counting on the Bubba jurors to hang the jury. One of them tried plea after the trial started and I believe the prosecution told them no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 51 minutes ago, Wacka said: They're mad we are not acting the way they want us to. Really? What do dirty toenails have to do with anything? It’s an asinine comment. Disgusting. 16 minutes ago, aristocrat said: One of them tried plea after the trial started and I believe the prosecution told them no. Not unusual. Typically the deal has an expiration date/time, an that expiration date/time almost never extends beyond jury selection. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 42 minutes ago, aristocrat said: So are you guys not happy they're about to be found guilty? The grousing you are seeing is that they already know how much extra work it will be to try and fit that outcome into the narrative. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 23, 2021 Author Share Posted November 23, 2021 2 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: The grousing you are seeing is that they already know how much extra work it will be to try and fit that outcome into the narrative. No, you are grousing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 42 minutes ago, Tiberius said: That's hardly a 100% guarantee. The fact they didn't plead it out tells me they are counting on the Bubba jurors to hang the jury. I don't expect a hung jury here. Based on the evidence I'd expect them to be found guilty. A self-defense argument doesn't hold any merit in this case. Citizens are generally not empowered to detain a person that poses no immediate threat and in addition has taken no observable action to break any law along with clearly attempting disengaging themselves from any type of confrontation. I'd expect a competent attorney would have advised his clients to accept or initiate some sort of plea arrangement rather than go to trial. But juries can be unpredictable. The circumstances here are much like the Zimmerman trial in the killing of Treyvon Martin in Florida. I thought Zimmerman was guilty there based on police instructions to not engage Martin in any way which Zimmerman ignored to initiate a confrontation. I don't believe self-defense is a valid argument when you are the instigator. For me the jury got it wrong here. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 14 minutes ago, Tiberius said: No, you are grousing. Come Tibs, You don’t want a conviction, you want the acquittal that fits your mind master’s narrative, even at the expense of the individual who was subjected to a hate crime. You continue to be the problem, not the solution. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 23, 2021 Author Share Posted November 23, 2021 7 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: Come Tibs, You don’t want a conviction, you want the acquittal that fits your mind master’s narrative, even at the expense of the individual who was subjected to a hate crime. You continue to be the problem, not the solution. Poster telling me what I think! 👎 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 24 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: I don't expect a hung jury here. Based on the evidence I'd expect them to be found guilty. A self-defense argument doesn't hold any merit in this case. Citizens are generally not empowered to detain a person that poses no immediate threat and in addition has taken no observable action to break any law along with clearly attempting disengaging themselves from any type of confrontation. I'd expect a competent attorney would have advised his clients to accept or initiate some sort of plea arrangement rather than go to trial. But juries can be unpredictable. The circumstances here are much like the Zimmerman trial in the killing of Treyvon Martin in Florida. I thought Zimmerman was guilty there based on police instructions to not engage Martin in any way which Zimmerman ignored to initiate a confrontation. I don't believe self-defense is a valid argument when you are the instigator. For me the jury got it wrong here. The Zimmerman doctored phone call that NBC released is what started all this right? Now they rush to racism for every narrative even though the Zimmerman thing wasn't about race. https://www.businessinsider.com/nbc-apologizes-to-george-zimmerman-for-editing-a-911-call-to-make-him-sound-really-racist-2012-4 But they ran with that narrative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts