Jump to content

H.R. 1 And The Fight For Voting Rights -- We The People!


Recommended Posts

 

 

Needed: A National Election Fraud Database

by Jay Valentine

 

United States voter fraud is a nationwide crime perpetrated locally, mostly by Democrats. Republicans either do not do it or when they do, they get caught. It is no coincidence that only Democrats fight voter ID laws, ballot audits in Maricopa County, and investigations in New Hampshire. (snip) we cannot fight industrial, sovereign, large-scale election fraud with reports, press releases, and webinars. (snip) The goal is a crowd-sourced national database, visible to anyone, showing who votes, their address, cross searched against death records, change-of-address files, UPS mailboxes, and a dozen other available data sources, going back as far as digital records exist.

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/05/needed_a_national_election_fraud_database.html

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Needed: A National Election Fraud Database

by Jay Valentine

 

United States voter fraud is a nationwide crime perpetrated locally, mostly by Democrats. Republicans either do not do it or when they do, they get caught. It is no coincidence that only Democrats fight voter ID laws, ballot audits in Maricopa County, and investigations in New Hampshire. (snip) we cannot fight industrial, sovereign, large-scale election fraud with reports, press releases, and webinars. (snip) The goal is a crowd-sourced national database, visible to anyone, showing who votes, their address, cross searched against death records, change-of-address files, UPS mailboxes, and a dozen other available data sources, going back as far as digital records exist.

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/05/needed_a_national_election_fraud_database.html

 

LMAO

 

Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/pseudoscience, use of poor sources, and several failed fact checks.

 

American Thinker (affectionately nicknamed "American Stinker" by its fans) is an online wingnut publication that's more or less the poor man's WND or Newsmax. The webshite, of course, is chock-full of right-wing conspiracy theories, woo, and pseudoscience. On the conspiracy side, they promote birtherism, "creeping sharia," red-baiting, and still occasionally prattle on about Vince Foster. On the science side, they concentrate on creationism and global warming denialism. The site's wingnut credentials are commemorated with an "extreme" bias rating from Media Bias/Fact Check.

 

Perfect source for people like Bonnie...  Meanwhile, he's advocating for a national election fraud database; but against H.R.1.

 

Any why is that its mostly Republicans involved with voter fraud these days?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nope .

 

Your self imposed "APPROVED site List"...............no longer works

 

You obviously did not read the article, but instead raced to find some slanted opinion to tell you what to think.

 

EXACTLY what you accuse others of doing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, BillStime said:


So why did Georgia close 240 voting sites?

 

 

You missed the point .......as usual.

 

It's not the number, it's HOW they are conducted

 

 

OPEN                                                                                                                                             Closed.

 

E0vRJz0WYAIcdv1?format=jpg&name=large         3tWK7B_0XY54CNr00?type=thumbnail_800x600

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

You missed the point .......as usual.

 

It's not the number, it's HOW they are conducted

 

 

OPEN                                                                                                                                             Closed.

 

E0vRJz0WYAIcdv1?format=jpg&name=large         3tWK7B_0XY54CNr00?type=thumbnail_800x600

 

 

 

 

 


This laughable - you’re highlighting how other countries do it and the GQP is literally signing law after law to suppress votes behind closed doors with select audience/media - disgraceful grasps of a dying political party.

 

Meanwhile - you and Seditionist Jim won’t acknowledge the fact that people stand in line for hours - up to 9 hours to vote in targeted areas - and the Grand Ol Party is closing voting sites and options on top of it - all in the name of ECONOMICS.

 

Bullllllllcrap

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

Same incorrect talking points.

 

Good job of responding to a call for open and transparent vote counts.

 

😂

 

Correct it - let's hear you CORRECT IT

 

I can't wait... GO!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Correct it - let's hear you CORRECT IT

 

I can't wait... GO!

 

 

Okay, I'm feeling generous, here is your correction

 

14 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

The GQP is literally signing law after law to suppress votes behind closed doors with select audience/media THIS IS FALSE

 

- disgraceful grasps of a dying political party.  THIS IS FALSE

 

Meanwhile - you and Seditionist Jim won’t acknowledge the fact that people stand in line for hours - up to 9 hours to vote in targeted areas THIS IS FALSE

 

- and the Grand Ol Party is closing voting sites and options on top of it - all in the name of ECONOMICS. and THIS IS FALSE

 

 

 

 

Bullllllllcrap THIS IS TRUE

 

 

 

 

Quick reminder about how adults discuss things,

 

YOU made the statements, it is up to you to provide actual facts to verify your crazy statements.

 

Sorry.

 

 

 

Edited by B-Man
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

Okay, I'm feeling generous, here is your correction

 

 

Quick reminder about how adults discuss things,

 

YOU made the statements, it is up to you to provide actual facts to verify your crazy statements.

 

Sorry.

 

 

 

 

SHOCKING, Bonnie failed, again. 

 

It's all true - and that's why you can't debunk ANY of it...

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

SHOCKING, Bonnie failed, again. 

 

It's all true - and that's why you can't debunk ANY of it...

 

Ho-hum

 

2 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

Quick reminder about how adults discuss things,

 

YOU made the statements, it is up to you to provide actual facts to verify your crazy statements.

 

Sorry.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Ho-hum

 

 


HA - you said they were all false with no back up sourcing of your own.

 

I’ve provided plenty to back up my arguments in the various threads so  get to work redstate!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillStime said:


 

I’ve provided plenty to back up my arguments in the various threads so  get to work redstate!!!

 

Bwahahahahaha!  You've backed up very little Mr Stop Asking Me Questions!!  

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

DEMOCRATS CAN’T QUASH THE ‘BIG LIE.’

 

The “Big Lie,” of course, isn’t that the 2020 election was stolen—it’s that the election was perfectly fair and lawful.

 

Texas and Arizona have passed several proposals that will tighten election requirements; Georgia Governor Brian Kemp signed a massive election reform bill in March that enraged Democrats across the country including Joe Biden.

 

Which is why Democrats, the media, and NeverTrumpers like Liz Cheney must keep the “Big Lie” taunt alive. The cowardice of congressional Republicans notwithstanding, political leadership at the state level and rank-and-file Republicans are working to ensure a redo of the 2020 election doesn’t happen again—most would rather be considered liars than craven bystanders while the country burns.

 

Unfortunately, the “Big Lie” faces more headwinds than just a Jake Tapper tantrum or a Liz Cheney op-ed: Joe Biden’s Justice Department is poised to use its power to halt election reform in advance of the 2022 election. During a congressional hearing this week, Attorney General Merrick Garland made clear he would use the agency’s Civil Rights division to fight Republican-backed election laws in court, especially those requiring photo identification

.

“The question on voter ID is what kind of disparate impact it has on voters of different races, colors and language groups, and whether it violates the Constitution by having a disparate impact on people’s ability to vote,” Garland told a House Appropriations Committee on Tuesday. “The Supreme Court has held that voter ID as a concept is constitutional. And the issue is what, in any individual cases [sic], the record shows about whether it deprives certain groups protected by the 14th Amendment right to vote.”

 

https://amgreatness.com/2021/05/06/democrats-cant-quash-the-big-lie/

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

DEMOCRATS CAN’T QUASH THE ‘BIG LIE.’

 

The “Big Lie,” of course, isn’t that the 2020 election was stolen—it’s that the election was perfectly fair and lawful.

 

Texas and Arizona have passed several proposals that will tighten election requirements; Georgia Governor Brian Kemp signed a massive election reform bill in March that enraged Democrats across the country including Joe Biden.

 

Which is why Democrats, the media, and NeverTrumpers like Liz Cheney must keep the “Big Lie” taunt alive. The cowardice of congressional Republicans notwithstanding, political leadership at the state level and rank-and-file Republicans are working to ensure a redo of the 2020 election doesn’t happen again—most would rather be considered liars than craven bystanders while the country burns.

 

Unfortunately, the “Big Lie” faces more headwinds than just a Jake Tapper tantrum or a Liz Cheney op-ed: Joe Biden’s Justice Department is poised to use its power to halt election reform in advance of the 2022 election. During a congressional hearing this week, Attorney General Merrick Garland made clear he would use the agency’s Civil Rights division to fight Republican-backed election laws in court, especially those requiring photo identification

.

“The question on voter ID is what kind of disparate impact it has on voters of different races, colors and language groups, and whether it violates the Constitution by having a disparate impact on people’s ability to vote,” Garland told a House Appropriations Committee on Tuesday. “The Supreme Court has held that voter ID as a concept is constitutional. And the issue is what, in any individual cases [sic], the record shows about whether it deprives certain groups protected by the 14th Amendment right to vote.”

 

https://amgreatness.com/2021/05/06/democrats-cant-quash-the-big-lie/

 

 

 

 

image.thumb.jpeg.23bb44438779bb8da84c87f613fab13a.jpeg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.cpr.org/2021/05/06/after-facing-numerous-recall-attempts-democratic-lawmakers-want-to-change-rules/

 

 

COLORADO: After Facing Numerous Recall Attempts, Democratic Lawmakers Want To Change Rules.

 

Now, as part of a larger election law “clean up” bill, lawmakers could change some of the rules for future recalls.

If the bill becomes law, recall petitions would be required to include an estimated cost of conducting a special election, as well as a statement from the official being targeted for recall, if they provide one.

 

“This is a big, disruptive force in our democratic process. I think it’s important that voters have, maybe not the full picture, but at least a sentence from both sides,” said Sen. Majority Leader Steve Fenburg, one of the bill’s sponsors. “It’s really just to make sure the information is out there, in that these recall efforts are being used for legitimate purposes and not for purely routine political attacks.”

 

 

 

 

I’m not a huge fan of recall elections, but I’m even less a fan of politicians telling me what’s “legitimate.”

 

  • Shocked 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

 

It would have?  

 

The Bill is nearly 400 pages and contains nearly 150,000 words.  The word food shows up once but only regarding how campaign funds can be used.  The words water, drinks and/or beverages are not found.  The word Volunteer shows up once and it has to do with the Inauguration.

 

You, and the rest, really need to stop getting your information and talking points from Twitter.  It make y'all a bunch of dumb Twits. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

It would have?  

 

The Bill is nearly 400 pages and contains nearly 150,000 words.  The word food shows up once but only regarding how campaign funds can be used.  The words water, drinks and/or beverages are not found.  The word Volunteer shows up once and it has to do with the Inauguration.

 

You, and the rest, really need to stop getting your information and talking points from Twitter.  It make y'all a bunch of dumb Twits. 

 

I would be more interested in REQUIRING polling places have free Coca-cola and Chick-Fil-A sandwiches.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/11/2021 at 5:06 PM, BillStime said:

Criminals

 

 

 

Arizona just passed a law that could kick 125,000 people off of the PERMANENT Early Voting List.

We’re seeing a nationwide effort to subvert our democracy. We have to pass the For The People Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act.

— Reverend Raphael Warnock (@ReverendWarnock) May 12, 2021

 

Except what did Warnock leave out about the Arizona law? Vital context that proves the law is much less ominous than he made it out to be:

 

Under the old law, voters on the permanent list automatically received a mail ballot for every election. The new law changes the name of the “permanent early voting list” to “active early voting list” and will remove voters from the list if they do not vote early at least once in a primary, general or municipal election during two consecutive election cycles. Election officials are to send voters a notice that they are going to be removed from the list, and voters will have 90 days to respond if they would like to remain on the list. It does not prevent people from voting in person and the voter remains registered.

 

Former NRSC advisor Matt Whitlock also pushed back on Warnock:

 

Updating voter rolls is OVERWHELMINGLY popular — because it's common sense.

📊59% of voters believe states should be REQUIRED to remove people who have moved or died from voter lists

📊Only 17% disagreehttps://t.co/y2iM8i3rJ1

— Matt Whitlock (@mattdizwhitlock) May 12, 2021

 

 

In light of his attack on Arizona, I’d like to take a moment to remind everyone – Georgia voters, especially – of Warnock’s office’s admission last month that his criticism of the Georgia bill was based on a draft version of it that did not become law. In other words, the Senator condemned a law that he had not even read and in the process, he hurt the state and voters whose interests he was elected to represent in the U.S. Senate.

 

https://redstate.com/sister-toldjah/2021/05/12/georgians-should-take-note-as-raphael-warnock-tries-sabotaging-another-state-over-its-voting-laws-n379202

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Arizona just passed a law that could kick 125,000 people off of the PERMANENT Early Voting List.

We’re seeing a nationwide effort to subvert our democracy. We have to pass the For The People Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act.

— Reverend Raphael Warnock (@ReverendWarnock) May 12, 2021

 

Except what did Warnock leave out about the Arizona law? Vital context that proves the law is much less ominous than he made it out to be:

 

Under the old law, voters on the permanent list automatically received a mail ballot for every election. The new law changes the name of the “permanent early voting list” to “active early voting list” and will remove voters from the list if they do not vote early at least once in a primary, general or municipal election during two consecutive election cycles. Election officials are to send voters a notice that they are going to be removed from the list, and voters will have 90 days to respond if they would like to remain on the list. It does not prevent people from voting in person and the voter remains registered.

 

Former NRSC advisor Matt Whitlock also pushed back on Warnock:

 

Updating voter rolls is OVERWHELMINGLY popular — because it's common sense.

📊59% of voters believe states should be REQUIRED to remove people who have moved or died from voter lists

📊Only 17% disagreehttps://t.co/y2iM8i3rJ1

— Matt Whitlock (@mattdizwhitlock) May 12, 2021

 

 

In light of his attack on Arizona, I’d like to take a moment to remind everyone – Georgia voters, especially – of Warnock’s office’s admission last month that his criticism of the Georgia bill was based on a draft version of it that did not become law. In other words, the Senator condemned a law that he had not even read and in the process, he hurt the state and voters whose interests he was elected to represent in the U.S. Senate.

 

https://redstate.com/sister-toldjah/2021/05/12/georgians-should-take-note-as-raphael-warnock-tries-sabotaging-another-state-over-its-voting-laws-n379202

 

Who doesn't love some redstate?

 

Don't you just love the way REDSTATE spins voter suppression?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...