SoCal Deek Posted July 23, 2022 Share Posted July 23, 2022 16 minutes ago, Albwan said: Yea the left is desperate, the whole we need to kill babies thing sort of fizzled. Not so fast….AOC was just fake arrested! 😂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted July 23, 2022 Share Posted July 23, 2022 18 hours ago, Gene Frenkle said: It took you more than a week to come up with that response? Julie Kelly - cOnSpIrAcY HERO! I’m on my own time. One of the benefits of retiring young👍🏻 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted July 23, 2022 Share Posted July 23, 2022 19 hours ago, Gene Frenkle said: It took you more than a week to come up with that response? Julie Kelly - cOnSpIrAcY HERO! When you absolutely know beyond any doubt that a leftist moron has nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted July 23, 2022 Share Posted July 23, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, DRsGhost said: How about from The Paper Of Record? Did not realize that the New York Times was a member of the committee. I know you’re dumb as rocks and have reading comprehension issues, but people analyzing what impact the committee may or may not have on the midterms is not the same as the committee being established with the purpose of helping the Dems in the midterms. Nuance is hard, but maybe take some time to clean the drool off your keyboard and think things through. Edited July 23, 2022 by ChiGoose 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted July 23, 2022 Share Posted July 23, 2022 9 hours ago, ChiGoose said: If you think the purpose of the committee is for ratings or to move the needles on the midterms, then you have no idea what you’re talking about. Then again, I’m not sure what I would expect from such illustrious outlets as… Donsurbur.blogspot and tvline…? Did you say this? Calling out a source? 1 minute ago, ChiGoose said: Did not realize that the New York Times was a member of the committee. I know you’re dumb as rocks and have reading comprehension issues, but people analyzing what impact the committee may or may not have on the midterms is not the same as the committee being established with the purpose of helping the Dems in the midterms. Nuance is hard, but maybe take some time to clean the drool off your keyboard and think things through. I present a different "trusted" source that says the exact same thing that you claimed only people who have no idea what they're talking about believe because they read your unapproved sources.... Yep, you're a clown. The only institution less trusted than media? Friggin congress. And that's where you place your trust? You're a blathering world salad spewing ideologue moron. Absolutely worse than @BillStime and @Tiberius. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted July 23, 2022 Share Posted July 23, 2022 2 minutes ago, DRsGhost said: Did you say this? Calling out a source? I present a different "trusted" source that says the exact same thing that you claimed only people who have no idea what they're talking about believe because they read your unapproved sources.... Yep, you're a clown. The only institution less trusted than media? Friggin congress. And that's where you place your trust? You're a blathering world salad spewing ideologue moron. Absolutely worse than @BillStime and @Tiberius. LOL. You truly cannot read, can you? I said the committee was not created for the purpose of helping the Dems in the midterms. I also said that people may try to analyze what impact it may or may not have on the midterms, but that was not why it was created. Then you bring analysis about what impact it may or may not have and then hold that up as evidence of the purpose of the committee. At this point, I’m not even sure if you could pass the Turing Test. Your posts are no different than if someone created a bot to scrape Breitbart comments and try to reproduce them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 23, 2022 Share Posted July 23, 2022 12 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: LOL. You truly cannot read, can you? I said the committee was not created for the purpose of helping the Dems in the midterms. I also said that people may try to analyze what impact it may or may not have on the midterms, but that was not why it was created. Then you bring analysis about what impact it may or may not have and then hold that up as evidence of the purpose of the committee. At this point, I’m not even sure if you could pass the Turing Test. Your posts are no different than if someone created a bot to scrape Breitbart comments and try to reproduce them. You would be wrong. Why do you think they waited until this time to hold them, and then bring them back in another 2 months, close to the election (while trying to tie every Republican to Trump). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted July 23, 2022 Share Posted July 23, 2022 (edited) 16 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: LOL. You truly cannot read, can you? I said the committee was not created for the purpose of helping the Dems in the midterms. I also said that people may try to analyze what impact it may or may not have on the midterms, but that was not why it was created. Then you bring analysis about what impact it may or may not have and then hold that up as evidence of the purpose of the committee. At this point, I’m not even sure if you could pass the Turing Test. Your posts are no different than if someone created a bot to scrape Breitbart comments and try to reproduce them. Stupid absolutely should hurt. I know what YOUR ridiculous take on the purpose the committee is. You believe it's purpose is impartial to arrive at the truth about J6. That take alone qualifies you as a mouth breathing moron. What YOU said is that if OTHERS think the purpose of the committee has anything to do with impacting the midterms then they have no idea what they're talking about. YOU said this and then you attacked the posters source to bolster your argument. The tweet I presented wasn't to prove the purpose of the committee. It was to show that "trusted" left wing sources have said THE EXACT SAME THING as the sources you attacked... you friggin cretin. Edited July 23, 2022 by DRsGhost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted July 23, 2022 Share Posted July 23, 2022 11 minutes ago, DRsGhost said: Stupid absolutely should hurt. I know what YOUR ridiculous take on the purpose the committee is. You believe it's purpose is impartial to arrive at the truth about J6. That take alone qualifies you as a mouth breathing moron. What YOU said is that if OTHERS think the purpose of the committee has anything to do with impacting the midterms then they have no idea what they're talking about. YOU said this and then you attacked the posters source to bolster your argument. The tweet I presented wasn't to prove the purpose of the committee. It was to show that "trusted" left wing sources have said THE EXACT SAME THING as the sources you attacked... you friggin cretin. Where in the NYT article you posted does it say the purpose of the committee is to affect the midterms? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted July 23, 2022 Author Share Posted July 23, 2022 16 minutes ago, Doc said: You would be wrong. Why do you think they waited until this time to hold them, and then bring them back in another 2 months, close to the election (while trying to tie every Republican to Trump). Dude, we have elections all the time. You can't hearings or trials or anything that are not close to some election time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted July 23, 2022 Share Posted July 23, 2022 9 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: Where in the NYT article you posted does it say the purpose of the committee is to affect the midterms? Maybe ask someone nearby to read it to you if you're having trouble. The purpose of the committee is what the members of the committee tell us that it is, right? Or maybe the only valid take on the purpose of the committee is what you tell us that it is? That oceanfront property in Iowa is still available at a great price btw. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 23, 2022 Share Posted July 23, 2022 They already have. Will the Jan. 6 Committee Repeat the Democrats’ Russia Mistake? https://www.19fortyfive.com/2022/07/will-the-jan-6-committee-repeat-the-democrats-russia-mistake/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted July 23, 2022 Share Posted July 23, 2022 10 minutes ago, DRsGhost said: Maybe ask someone nearby to read it to you if you're having trouble. The purpose of the committee is what the members of the committee tell us that it is, right? Or maybe the only valid take on the purpose of the committee is what you tell us that it is? That oceanfront property in Iowa is still available at a great price btw. Got it. It doesn’t say what you said it does so now you need to dodge and hope nobody notices. Well done! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 23, 2022 Share Posted July 23, 2022 (edited) 46 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Dude, we have elections all the time. You can't hearings or trials or anything that are not close to some election time They easily could have held them towards the end of last year. Or the beginning of this year. Edited July 23, 2022 by Doc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted July 23, 2022 Share Posted July 23, 2022 10 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: Got it. It doesn’t say what you said it does so now you need to dodge and hope nobody notices. Well done! Uh huh. Because giving "Democrats a chance to recast midterm message" has absolutely zero to do with trying to impact mid term election results. Dude, just take the L. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Buffalo Posted July 23, 2022 Share Posted July 23, 2022 10 hours ago, ChiGoose said: If you think the purpose of the committee is for ratings or to move the needles on the midterms, then you have no idea what you’re talking about. Then again, I’m not sure what I would expect from such illustrious outlets as… Donsurbur.blogspot and tvline…? I am curious what you think is the purpose? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted July 23, 2022 Share Posted July 23, 2022 1 minute ago, Buffalo Timmy said: I am curious what you think is the purpose? To investigate the attempt to overturn the 2020 election. What happened? Who was involved? What changes can we make to prevent a future attempt? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Buffalo Posted July 23, 2022 Share Posted July 23, 2022 Just now, ChiGoose said: To investigate the attempt to overturn the 2020 election. What happened? Who was involved? What changes can we make to prevent a future attempt? So it is to cover things we already know? We know who was involved, we know what happened, and we know how to prevent it. Next time we have a publicly announced rally with people on TV stating they want to invade the capitol we actually have more police present than usual. The fact that the FBI and capitol Hill police are not the focus of the committee proves they are not doing what you claim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted July 23, 2022 Share Posted July 23, 2022 3 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said: So it is to cover things we already know? We know who was involved, we know what happened, and we know how to prevent it. Next time we have a publicly announced rally with people on TV stating they want to invade the capitol we actually have more police present than usual. The fact that the FBI and capitol Hill police are not the focus of the committee proves they are not doing what you claim. We know everybody involved in the fake electors scheme? We know everyone in on the Eastman plan and their roles? There was more to this than the riot. There was a plan in motion and the rioters were not the only aspect of it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted July 23, 2022 Share Posted July 23, 2022 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said: So it is to cover things we already know? We know who was involved, we know what happened, and we know how to prevent it. Next time we have a publicly announced rally with people on TV stating they want to invade the capitol we actually have more police present than usual. The fact that the FBI and capitol Hill police are not the focus of the committee proves they are not doing what you claim. Exactly. Kash Patels testimony would be interesting to hear given he was the DoD point person trying to get congressional leadership or Mayor Bowser to sign off on Trumps National Guard request. The National Guard not being present seems like a major failure that allowed events of J6 to spiral out of control. Yet the committee seems uninterested in probing that aspect.... Why I wonder if they are interested in leaving no stone unturned in determining why it happened and preventing it from happening again? Edited July 23, 2022 by DRsGhost 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts